Great original reporting El Reg... unfortunately, I'm not surprised!
Police, firefighters, ambulances, hospitals: 20 per cent still rely on Win Server 2003
One in every five public-sector health and emergency services organisations in the UK will still be running Windows Server 2003 after Microsoft ends extended support today. A Reg investigation of 33 hospitals, ambulance trusts, police and fire and rescue services found that many are still running Windows Server 2003 on a lot …
COMMENTS
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
-
-
Tuesday 14th July 2015 12:27 GMT Velv
I don't understand El Reg's obsession with the end of support for Server 2003. The world is not going to suddenly collapse.
We balance risks against rewards or costs on a daily basis. Getting out of bed carries risk. Stand on that Lego brick and it'll hurt, so you look where you're going.
There is nothing wrong with running an OS without vendor support as long as you understand (and perhaps mitigate) the risk of failure. I wouldn't front Server 2003 onto the Internet. But my SQLServer that's firewalled even from the internal users (1433 only) is relatively well protected against attack.
I expect down votes, but then I'm not being paid by Microsoft to spin the sale of upgrades.
-
Wednesday 15th July 2015 10:48 GMT Dan 10
Support
I know the Custom Support Agreement provides hotixes and updates (although only critical one, and that's as judged by MS), but does the CSA provide continued access to tech support - given that you need a premier support agreement in order to purchase a CSA? Or has 2003 tech support been killed as part of this?