More likely it's all the fear-mongering idiot self-declared "feminists" who yell constantly about the "boys club" and call everything a misogynist patriarchal conspiracy to keep women naked and barefoot. Creates something of a hostile environment, you might say.
Women are fleeing from the digital sector, reckons UK.gov report
Fewer women are working in the digital sector than a decade ago, according to a report by the UK Commission for Employment and Skills quango. Currently just one quarter of employees are women in digital businesses such as software development, visual effects and computer games - down from one-third in 2002 - according to the …
COMMENTS
-
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 10:33 GMT Anonymous Coward
Self-fulfilling prophecy
You beat me to it - this was my first reaction to the article and I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought it. It's a field where the balance is likely to always be off the magical 50-50 that our glorious overlords require but the environment has been improving quite a lot over the years and for a while looked like it might have been 'settling' to an almost stable figure.
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 18:56 GMT Hollerith 1
Or not, @AC?
Dear original AC,
You say " fear-mongering idiot self-declared "feminists" who yell constantly about the "boys club" and call everything a misogynist patriarchal conspiracy". Has this happened to you? Do you know of women who call themselves feminists? (BTW, why the quotation marks around the word in your text?) Have you sat in an IT department feeling hostile to all women because some woman accused you all of being in a conspiracy? Have you ever been troubled by real doubt and insecurity caused by accusations?
Kinda thinking not.
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 23:24 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Or not, @AC?
There are feminists and then there are "feminists". The former are like my mother, who ran a large department in a major city council for a decade, or my wife, who would rather go homeless than accept a handout based on her gender. They work for their equality. They fight for their place.
The later are whining little children who want everything on a plate and screech about the patriarchy whenever they don't get their way.
-
Thursday 18th June 2015 07:22 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Or not, @AC?
There seems to be some very bitter forum feminists in EU and UK, that will hijack any thread regardless what its about and pick anything for a hook to roll out their special purpose heavy artillery.
I said, look, I have no beef with you, but make your own thread, I'm trying to talk about the ill effects of TV soap operas on small children here.
There's no automatism with human beings that makes a woman or a man more or less dominant, except for societies brainwashing of children. Some (of either gender) are strong regardless of that and other's are not. You can't force every woman into one thing or the other. Ok, so there's some people that try, but it never worked in the first place, though the church was pretty effective with their nasty methods of just burning people at the stake.
So I can understand if some women get bitter about it, but there's no universal solution or fix, it can only be individual. Ideologies are always at odds with reality.
And we all know what's happening to that charter of liberty right now, hard won by our ancestors, its getting shredded in the war of the ultra rich against everyone else.
-
-
-
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 10:10 GMT Trevor_Pott
Most IT jobs are pretty shit. IT is thankless, the pay is bad, the stress is intense, the demands to work 24/7 are incessant...the list goes on.
Every now and again some wag feels they need to post about how great their specific job is, but they are the exception that proves the rule. The fact that having a job that only demands you work the number of hours specified in your local labour legislation is something nerds use to measure the size of their penis is itself proof that IT jobs, in general, are ass.
Every time someone whines about how there are no women in IT, I want to slap them with a salmon and yell "that's because they're smarter than us, you blithering idiot!"
If you want women in IT, make IT jobs less shit.
-
-
-
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 17:40 GMT Trevor_Pott
Re: Having children is not mandatory.
"But if you do not have them at some point while you're still young, you are missing on a very important part of life."
No, I'm not. I have two cats, a bearded dragon, several hundred fish, a long tailed grass lizard and a Mediterranean house gecko. I am full up on other organisms that believe they are the emperor of the universe and that I am their subject, thanks.
I understand that it's a universal thing amongst parents that they need to delude themselves into believing that child rearing is somehow "special" and 'rewarding" and other such things. I don't buy it for a second.
I get all the "special" and "rewarding" I need when I have a kitty jump up on the couch beside me, flop over and purr like a goddamned lawnmower for an hour while I rub his belly. Or when the beardie climbs up bed and park herself directly on my chest and promptly passes out.
As hard as it is for breeders to understand, there is no part of me that desires children. There is no part of my life that is void without them, there is no space in my desires or happiness that they need to fill.
The next generation should be grateful that I am not passing on my genes. They are not good genes. Humanity gets a little bit less awful, and I live a contented life. I think this "not spawning" thing has it's merits.
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 19:01 GMT Hollerith 1
Re: Having children is not mandatory.
Mr Pott, I salute you. I, too, tire of parents sure that I am missing out on one of life's greatest privileges, or that I have an emotional or genetic need that, while it remains unfulfilled, is destined to make my life feel like a hollow mockery. I personally think they either lack imagination (that a satisfying life can be lived in other ways) or resent us for not bending our necks to the yoke of parenthood.
-
-
-
-
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 20:48 GMT Trevor_Pott
"Children are yours. You don't get anything out of shitty IT jobs other than a smaller than it should paycheck."
Uh...no. Children are human beings that are born with a full suite of inalienable rights. They are not property. They belong to themselves and noone else.
Your paycheque should be paying your mortgage, car and other material goods. You get to keep those. Those material goods are yours.
-
-
Monday 10th August 2015 07:10 GMT Paul
Being a sysadmin or IT support like parenting
You spend a lot of time fixing up the s**t left behind by other people, dealing with people who feel they're more important than anyone else, dealing with feelings of entitlement, dealing with people who are willfully ignorant and unable to learn.
It's like being a carer in a teenager's foster home sometimes.
A woman who's already a mother might not want a job that's like being at home.
-
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 10:48 GMT codejunky
@ Trevor_Pott
"Most IT jobs are pretty shit. IT is thankless, the pay is bad, the stress is intense, the demands to work 24/7 are incessant...the list goes on."
While I can believe you have and probably had these experiences in IT it does make me grateful for the jobs I have done. I love the work I do and I honestly enjoy IT. In fact the only soul destroying job of absolute hell was working retail during university and that was mostly due to the staff.
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 11:17 GMT DiViDeD
Optional Title
Oh Trevor!
I surely can't be the only person in IT who loves his or her job. 35 years now, man and old man and I wouldn't swap any of it, even with the loony business people and the 'super users' who just want me to 'add another zero. How hard can THAT be?'
From wheelie chair volley ball and networked X Wing vs Tie Fighter all the way down to occasionally getting some actual work done I wouldn't have missed it for the world.
Or maybe I just need to get out more. Or less. One or the other.
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 17:42 GMT Trevor_Pott
Re: Optional Title
"I surely can't be the only person in IT who loves his or her job. "
Oddly enough, if you'd actually read my comment you would have noticed that I had already predicted that response and discussed it. From my previous comment:
"Every now and again some wag feels they need to post about how great their specific job is, but they are the exception that proves the rule. The fact that having a job that only demands you work the number of hours specified in your local labour legislation is something nerds use to measure the size of their penis is itself proof that IT jobs, in general, are ass."
Stop being predictable!
-
Friday 12th June 2015 17:11 GMT jelabarre59
That's been my thought. Perhaps women are smarter than us men in realizing what a dead-end the IT field has become. Certainly no future in it unless you're working in some dirt-floor shack in some 3rd world country. In that case you're probably running the world's data centers (presuming you can keep the dirt and cow-poop out of the servers).
-
-
-
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 10:34 GMT Anonymous Coward
Trust me it does
Just go and visit an IT company somewhere East of the Berlin/Prague line.
The difference is that they are paid up to 5x (relative to the country average salaries) and respectively 2x+ (expressed in effective buying power) more than in the UK.
On top of that in the upper tier for MVPs you can see benefit packages with up to 2 years (yes two years) paid maternity leave. Try getting two years paid maternity leave from a UK employer. Go on, try that. I am going to buy the popcorn.
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 09:31 GMT theOtherJT
Risky thing to say as a man, I know but...
Could it be that this isn't actually a problem?
I mean, if there are lines out the door of recruiting offices around the world where capable women are being rejected in favour of less capable men, then yes - that's clearly a serious problem - but we have been hiring quite a bit over the last couple of years and so far out of about 100 people who've applied, only 5 have been women.
I know it's not a popular viewpoint and everything, but perhaps women - on average - just don't find our industry appealing? I wouldn't be very surprised. I mean even I don't find our industry appealing, and if I'd had a better idea what I was getting into earlier on, I probably would have quit whilst there was still time and retrained as something else.
I mean, let me paint you a picture here, and lets see if it resonates with any of you:
I spend most of my time in isolation in a dark, noisy, overly hot office, on my own, staring into the abyss of a cheap TFT which gives me headaches if I forget to take my half hourly breaks. I rarely see the other staff I work with, although it feels more like "for" because when I do see them it's only ever because something is broken - in which case I'm already working on it and I want them to go away - or because they have somehow managed to raise ignorance about IT to a fine art, and brandish it about like a shield preventing them from having to take any responsibility for "losing" important emails or documents about once a week.
Neither way are they making my working life better by turning up in my office and talking to me. I don't _like_ interacting with my co-workers. But then I don't like interacting with people much in general. Being an irritable anti-social bastard isn't a uniquely male trait I know, but you gotta admit you meet more of them than women who feel the same.
Oh, and then there's this:
http://www.stilldrinking.org/programming-sucks
Seriously, is there anyone here who _doesn't_ feel that's what it's like? With the camel. Anyone? We're not crazy. We're being _driven_ crazy.
If women are actively avoiding IT, perhaps the problem isn't the way IT treats women. Perhaps it's the way it treats _everyone_ and most women are just either smart enough not to put themselves through this, or not prepared to put up with it in exchange for a life where you don't have to wear a suit or talk to people much.
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 09:32 GMT Anonymous Coward
Curious....
...that the high male participation in IT is somehow a structural problem deserving of government attention and much hand wringing by liberals and feminists alike, but the high and rising female participation in medicine, nursing, veterinary work, law, public relations, marketing is no problem at all.
The logical solution Guardian readers would probably approve of is 50:50 legal quotas, but that needs to be backed up by allocation of roles, because it doesn't follow that all those women choosing law or medicine.
So, not wishing to generalise the feminist agenda at all: Hairy, unwashed, sexist, white males of IT, better sign yourself up to a basic social skills course, because in future you might find that you've got to give up the comfortable binary world of IT and become a doctor, teacher or a vet.
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 19:09 GMT Hollerith 1
Re: Curious....
Ledswinger, there is a lot of handwringing when boys do less well than girls in school, and governments look into how to right that wrong. Although I have never understood why it was a bad thing. Heaven knows, the boys don't seem to suffer when they get to the job market.
I think chaps in IT, who have up till now works for a boys' club, are able to indulge themselves in a way that chaps in, say, Finance or Legal or Marketing cannot. I suspect that change will happen, eventually, because simple good manners should not be beyond anyone, especially the bright minds (and I am not being snarky) within IT.
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 09:33 GMT dogged
The only possible solution is that all women are forced to work in IT. No woman should be permitted to choose any other career and it is irrelevant whether or not they actually like IT or have any desire to learn the skills or be interested in the concepts. Mandatory. All women. Until this disgusting situation is dealt with.
Also darts. Women are horrendously under-represented in professional top tier darts and therefore all women will now be forced, by law, to play darts at least five times a week or face a custodial sentence in a special darts training centre.
-
-
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 13:33 GMT breakfast
Re: High WIS
Jeff Atwood talked about about this a while back: http://blog.codinghorror.com/software-developers-and-aspergers-syndrome/ ( with interesting follow-up pertinent to the original story here: http://blog.codinghorror.com/what-can-men-do/ )
The ratio of autism diagnosis is 4:1 in favour of males, but the incidence of female autism spectrum problems is higher than most people realise because women tend to manifest symptoms a little differently - possibly as a result of cultural conditioning - and they can often go without being diagnosed.
-
-
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 09:41 GMT silent_count
He said: "Initiatives like TechFuture Girls that encourage young women to consider a career in this dynamic sector will play an important role in addressing this issue.”
Why? Is there any virtue to having a 50-50 gender split in the IT, or any other, sector?
I don't see any urgency to get men into fields which are dominated by women, and I'm ok with that too, because I don't see what's wrong with accepting that some fields appeal more to some population groups than others.
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
-
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 10:51 GMT msknight
Arse backwards
Instead of doing a report on the people that won't come in to the sector, why don't they do a report on WHY women are leaving the sector and work from there?
If it's because they can't get an iPhone in pink, then that tells you all you need to know.
On the other hand, if it's because they're belittled by the blokes, then their sales patter might as well be, "Come work in the lions den! Get your arse bitten off!"
... but unless someone actually does some bleedin' research to find out, we're not going to know!
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 10:52 GMT Douchus McBagg
ergh. this again?
positive discrimination is still discrimination.
not being funny, but you don't need a vagina to see that IT sucks. Seems to me if you have a dick, you're dumb enough to put up with it.
Also, How would it feel to know that you got the job, not because you are either the best fit, most suited, capable for the role, but that you simply tick a box. how do your new colleagues feel that their tight budget constraints paid for you? that their time, effort, and energy is going to be spent supporting you? any resentment?
wonder if el'Reg can pull up a similar headline from when the *licks finger, holds in the air* last gov-reshuffle/minister-of-information-appointment/education-secretary-appointment/national-union-of-teachers-conference/political-party-conference happened?
I predict that this is not the last time we will see this type of headline.
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 11:56 GMT Otto is a bear.
Commoditized career
There's a general trend in IT to de-skill jobs, probably more so that anywhere else. I work a lot on outsource bids, and the "Production" side of the business is always talking about how to lower the skill value of delivery staff and providing a commodity product. Frighteningly they seem to be succeeding, but then our customers always want their IT mess for less, which equates to less people working for less money, on less kit, with less tools, and for longer hours, but delivering more.
I suspect that the numbers of people wanting to come into the IT industry is dropping across the board, with such a tough entry level environment, would you want to join, regardless of your gender. I'd also wonder about mid-career breaks distorting the numbers.
Still if you want a 60K job in five years, apparently Tube and Train driving is where you want to be, a lot less stress too on a 35 hour week. Requires only GCSE Maths & English, rather than any higher education, and you get paid to train.
https://nationalcareersservice.direct.gov.uk/advice/planning/jobprofiles/Pages/TrainDriver.aspx
It knocks being a teacher or doctor into a cocked hat as well, even if we can earn a lot more, it takes a lot longer to get there.
But ultimately, I expect it's just the young being feckless and just wanting to be famous.
PS. Try and find a male Nursery Nurse, now that really is a badly paid minimum wage job with long hours and lots of responsibility.
-
-
-
Friday 12th June 2015 00:27 GMT Old Handle
Re: cultural marxism
I think efestnetz is referring to the Frankfurt School and Critical Theory. Some regard this as a conspiracy theory, but it's not completely illogical. There is if nothing else a certain similarity between their views and those of the least likable branches of feminism. The type who would say "You think you're happy with that receptionist job, but you're actually being oppressed and just don't know it yet."
-
-
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 15:10 GMT Anonymous Coward
Female priorities are different
Women value secure jobs, predictable work hours and predictable salary and there are very few such jobs in IT. Many tech position are more or less reserved for younger people and many find themselves out of work or in need of re-education when they are in the mid to late 30s. Nearly 80% of IT workers are either unemployed or working outside IT after 40. A life-long carrier in IT is an illusion,
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
Thursday 11th June 2015 23:07 GMT earl grey
spent the last 45+ years in IT
Not all of it doing the same thing. Some operations; some coding; some support - you name it. Have seen a lot of very qualified women on the job over those years; as well qualified and capable as any male IT grunt. Also seen a lot of totally unqualified men and women who should have picked another line of work. IT happens. Two of my daughters have gone into IT and I can only hope they stick with it and keep updating their skills. There are careers, but tiny things like what we see from massive companies like Google to not encourage me that they are at all serious about hiring and keeping more female IT personnel. The biggest problem in the US is the H1B crime committed by a lot of large corporations in hiring personnel and firing experienced folks (I'm looking at you Disney), and the tax laws that allow large corporations to outsource their IT personnel, steal most of their pension and generally shaft them and then write off their "hired out" workers (literally every company that outsources their IT who used to be in-house employees).
-
Friday 12th June 2015 08:05 GMT Anonymous Coward
Stats
So there is now a quarter of the workforce of 2 million that is female - approx. 500,000. this is down from a third but what of? The article goes on to say that 1.2 million more roles will be created in the next 7 years, so lets assume that in the past 10 years a million roles were created, that would mean that women were a third of the million roles that existed a decade ago. this is approx. 333,333 and a tiny bit.
surely that means more women are employed than ten years ago?
or is this just some statistic to prove whatever you wish it to?