I don't understand why people keep installing it. For 99% of users, it's not useful at all anymore. The few who still have to use it are almost all, thankfully, stuck with old antique versions from when JAVA was owned by sun.
Bite my shiny metal Ask: Java for OS X crapware storm brewing
Mac fans now have one more thing in common with their Windows-using bosses: their Oracle Java updates now try to smuggle in Ask's browser toolbar. The upgrade, version 8u40 of Java for OS X, tragically tries to install the plugin, which hijacks the user's default web search engine and homepage to Ask.com. Windows users of the …
COMMENTS
-
-
Friday 6th March 2015 23:26 GMT Kevin McMurtrie
Applet plugin != Application runtime
The Java runtime is quite useful and common. Some types of applications are faster to develop in Java or easier to support across diverse platforms.
99.99999% of users should not install the Java browser plugin. The applet environment is so awful that software engineers gladly waited 15 years for JavaScript to catch up, and even tolerated Flash in the meantime. That bad.
-
-
Saturday 7th March 2015 11:45 GMT Wensleydale Cheese
Re: I believe Java is still necessary for the hapless Libre/OpenOffice suites
Nope. I'm happily running LibreOffice without Java.
Yes, a few years ago the installer would bitch if you didn't have Java installed, but you could still go ahead and install it without.
I've just checked v4.4 and the database element wants Java. I can do without that bit thanksverymuch.
-
Monday 9th March 2015 08:47 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: I believe Java is still necessary for the hapless Libre/OpenOffice suites
"They're manned by two of the most unresponsive dev teams of all time, so I'd expect to see Java remaining a requirement for at least another few decades."
Sounds like an admission that LibreOffice has a decent future ahead of it!
-
-
Friday 6th March 2015 22:49 GMT DNTP
I need Java on my Mac and I just did the 8u40 upgrade, but didn't get an option to infect my computer with malware I mean install the Ask toolbar. And I'm sure I didn't blind click through it. Maybe it does not show up for users who upgrade Java through System Preferences rather than downloading the update package through their browsers?
Anyway I find Ask is an important IT tool when I encounter it, it tells me "How much time am I going to have to waste on this computer seeing how deep the can of worms goes" and also "If I hear this user is looking for me in the future how much effort will I spend dodging them".
-
-
-
Monday 9th March 2015 16:11 GMT Stevie
Re: Bah!
"Just associate .pdf with Chrome"
My first and last experience of chrome was when trying to get a BeagleBoneBlack to talk to me through its USB webby interface. Though listed as politically acceptable in the dox my browser of choice would not render the workbench correctly.
Chrome installed, and the very first thing it did was attempt to scrape all my e-mail contacts. When thwarted is started a nag campaign. This, coupled with Google deciding my real name, by which I was known to three people, was a better choice for my blogger account profile than my web name, used for over a decade for same and known by up to three dozen people from all over the world, made me decide on the spot that were Chrome the last browser on the face of the internet I'd renounce the game of Mornington Crescent rather than use it.
Mention it not again. It is, in my mind, the stuff of opium dreams; not real, spoken of by maniacs chemically unhinged from real life, the sign of a life mis-spent in darkened rooms wreathed in thick smoke. 8o)
-
-
Friday 6th March 2015 23:47 GMT beast666
Only the JRE not the JDK
I need this abomination on my hackintosh to run Eclipse, which is itself the spawn of Satan.
Anyways-up, the latest Java 8 JRE does try to sneak the wonderful Ask toolbar on you. If you install the JDK, which also installs the JRE, it doesn't.
Take-home point: I hate you Java and all who sail in you.
-
Saturday 7th March 2015 19:06 GMT Destroy All Monsters
Re: Only the JRE not the JDK
Take-home point: I hate you Java and all who sail in you.
You seem to not develop in Java, so do you mean "I hate the JVM" or "I hate the Oracle JVM" or "I hate the JRE package that Oracle provides" or "I hate Oracle"?
Enquiring minds etc.
I feel the urge for .Net runtimes. Now that Clojure has been ported...
-
-
Saturday 7th March 2015 00:08 GMT RachelG
am a Java Dev, albeit mainly server-side. But this pisses me off so much. I mean, client-side Java has *enough* problems with end-user acceptance already, much of it ill-informed (say as valid as refusing to use Windows now because of my experience with Windows ME) but nevertheless there, without *this* too. It's really, really unhelpful. I can't believe (especially after the Lenovo debacle) that they really get enough from it to be worth the reputational damage. No-one, but no-one wants the bloody ask toolbar!
I think if I was to be trying to develop something for the desktop now I'd be looking at the Packager stuff, to just create it as a standalone app, that bundles a minimal JRE for its own use, work hard at seamless OS integration, and really just quietly not bother the user with even the knowledge that it's Java. But if you're going to do that you're probably better off going native anyway.
BTW if you install the JDK rather than the JRE from Java.com, no ask toolbar. And there's a setting in the Java control panel to turn off future prompts to install ask, but it's really not good enough. They reserve the worst experience for the poor bloody end user.
-
-
-
Monday 9th March 2015 15:25 GMT SImon Hobson
Re: At least on a Windows PC...
> there's a checkbox in the Java control panel, Advanced page/miscellaneous: "Suppress sponsor offers when installing or updating Java"
There wasn't in mine - it only appeared after upgrading from .39 to .40
And it appears unchecked.
But at least the updater didn't prompt me for anything. I'm currently running a scan for it just to be safe.
I'm guessing that perhaps they slipped the checkbox in sometime without actually changing the revision level. So those with the checkbox already get prompted for the malware, while those still without it just get the option installed silently (ready for next time).
I'm sure there's scope for an enterprising person with the wherewithall to go to the Police and report a crime under the misuse of computers act. I think it would be a hard case to make that the user has "given permission" by the action of not noticing this new option appearing down at the end of a long list of settings that the average user couldn't be expected to understand (let alone be fiddling with). Thus installing such malware would be interfering with the computer without the user's consent.
-
-
Saturday 7th March 2015 00:16 GMT Anonymous Coward
Complain and spam them back
Here all start complaining!!!
http://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/main.jsp At the bottom under “Report an Issue” from the drop down select “Comments and/or Suggestions” and write away!
If thats not enough for you send the CEO’s an email as well!! mark.hurd@oracle.com and safra.catz@oracle.com they seem to hold a joint CEO positions.
-
Saturday 7th March 2015 08:33 GMT smartypants
Re: Complain and spam them back
It's not like they aren't aware of the hatred. When you go to that bug report link, you see the following message: "Here is a list of commonly reported issues. Please select the issue that you are facing from the list below:" Then there are 10 or so options. Top of them is:
"How do I install Java without third party sponsor offers?"
So they know it pisses people off. But they still do it. It's as though they're actively trying to drive people away from the platform.
-
-
Saturday 7th March 2015 00:26 GMT JLV
well, my Brother laserprinter's wifi setup is through... drumroll, a Java applet (good printer otherwise).
once installed, it seems as if Java 7 on OSX has no system-wide uninstaller (though there is a Java applet-disabling setting).
next time, I'll VM a Java for the duration instead but I didn't know you couldn't uninstall Java.
and, for the record, before that printer, I had pretty much happily avoided any Java, applet, JRE or JDK on my Mac. the lack of an uninstall mechanism is hardly going to make me revise my opinion that Java is best avoided entirely if one can get away with it.
as far as ask.com goes, I really wonder what a gazillion $ company like Oracle is doing with this on a Java install. not, quite, as dumb as Lenovo, but how much $ are they getting for how much bad press? they should not renew whatever arrangement they have and come clean on when their ask.com shenanigans will go away.
-
Saturday 7th March 2015 05:46 GMT Mad Hacker
Java still needed here...
When I was younger I sure bought into the write once run everywhere mantra. Since the realities of Java's security issues have become obvious I've whittled down my Java dependencies down to one app. For the rare occasion (once a year?) I purchase something on eBay I use JBidwatcher. Runs brilliantly in Java on my Mac.
-
Saturday 7th March 2015 08:20 GMT Scroticus Canis
Haven't had Java or Adobe Reader for 2+ years and no problems.
Killed Java and un-installed Adobe Reader over two years ago and haven't noticed anything missing at all. Everything works fine and no problems with PDFs as preview reads them just fine. Still need the accursed Flash Player though and scrub the tracking crap once a week or so.
-
Saturday 7th March 2015 09:17 GMT Christian Berger
Re: Haven't had Java or Adobe Reader for 2+ years and no problems.
To be honest, so far Acrobat Reader seems to be one of the worst PDF readers out there as it has all the features you don't want to have.
Java... well... It just seems like most software coded in Java is rather messy and complex stuff. Kinda like all those uncounted Windows applications which do 20 things really badly. There are a few exceptions, mostly academical software which could have been implemented in portable C more easily, but the professor somehow believed that Java had a future.
-
-
Saturday 7th March 2015 09:37 GMT sorry, what?
Most Java != applet (a short trip off-topic)
i see no reason to install the JRE on a machine unless it's a server. In that case it is part of a good programming and runtime environment. Some of the open source stuff you can use is really impressive and the must-have IDE (no, not Eclipse, of course) is fantastic.
I miss Java and IntelliJ IDEA, now I work on C# and VisualStudio. Well, actually C# ain't bad (if you ignore the general lack of great open source libraries) but VS is Virtually Senile.
-
Saturday 7th March 2015 23:02 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Most Java != applet (a short trip off-topic)
There used to be an IDEA that was for C++ that didn't require Java, however I have no idea if that still exists. But you're right, IntelliJ was good, really good. Even though it's been over a decade since I used IntelliJ, when I go tinkering with new IDEs I still compare the IDE features and Ui's to my memory of IntelliJ.
Today though I've abandoned IDEs all together and just run scripts with a decent text editor. It was the general "What goes where" memory lessons that turned me off from all the different IDEs. Of course I'm a micro-manager when it comes to development environments, so I have a bias for controlling all little things the way I want and to have them fail as I want. But in the end, it really was "Where the fuck is that again? Wait, do I need it?". I can't remember V.S. all that well, but I remember the debugger was O.K. I also remember it had little terminologies that weren't exactly truthful to their functionality, which made the help manual almost as important as having a monitor to see.
NOTE: I just went to http://www.jetbrains.com/products.html and none of the names pop out at me, so maybe I'm crazy or they changed the name...but I swear I thought they had a C++ Intelli IDE.
-
-
Saturday 7th March 2015 13:59 GMT RobHib
Bloody hell, when will this nonsense ever stop?
"...Oracle Java updates now try to smuggle in Ask's browser toolbar."
For fuck's sake, when are these disreputable practices going to stop? How the hell can we expect the multitudes of nefarious exploits to cease when supposedly reputable companies resort to such treachery by only being one step removed? The excuse being by example.
This disreputable nonsense is truly getting out of hand, it's time we users revolted, big-time.
-
Saturday 7th March 2015 18:32 GMT regadpellagru
Re: Bloody hell, when will this nonsense ever stop?
"For fuck's sake, when are these disreputable practices going to stop? How the hell can we expect the multitudes of nefarious exploits to cease when supposedly reputable companies resort to such treachery by only being one step removed? The excuse being by example.
This disreputable nonsense is truly getting out of hand, it's time we users revolted, big-time."
There's only one way, mate: uninstall the whole shite, and tell every single person you meet in the street how it's an awfull pile of dangerous shit. People are becoming *very* suspicious each time they're bitten by crapware, so they are eventually listening.
-
-
Saturday 7th March 2015 23:29 GMT 45RPM
In common with their bosses? In my experience, the bosses (the ones who sign off on the budget) all have Macs - and they force their minions to use cheap ass Windows Dell machines. Not saying whether that's right or wrong (actually, I am saying - I reckon that users should be able to choose the platform that they're comfortable with, provided that they can demonstrate the technical know how required to support themselves). The point is that the bosses are running the shiny shiny. The minions have Windows. FTFY.
-
Wednesday 11th March 2015 17:37 GMT TheDoc
Must be some genuine reason
The bundling of the Ask toolbar is very un-Oracle, which shies away from partnership deals with 3th parties in general - especially when it's not worth less than many millions of dollars. So why on earth are they still doing this? I have a few theories; 1) It's some inherited contract that they haven't managed to get out of, 2) Larry Elison has some stake in the company which owns Ask, so doesn't see the need to rock the boat, or 3) It's never made it far enough up the to-do list.
Any other ideas?
-
Thursday 12th March 2015 10:29 GMT Dan 55
Re: Must be some genuine reason
It came in after the Oracle buyout, I suppose every product line needs to show a profit to pay for Larry's yachts. Ask pay handsomely ($5 per installation if I remember right).
The screenshot also shows a trap, it's got a tickbox for 'Set ask.com as my homepage' but it's not got a tickbox for not installing the toolbar. I guess if you were to untick and click continue you get the toolbar anyway, you'd need to hit cancel.
I tried to install Java 7 ages ago and they did something which borked my Eclipse installation so I installed it by hand, went back to Apple's Java 6, and disabled it in the browser. Not missed it.
-