Wouldn't it be cheaper and more or less as reliable just to flip a coin?
REPORT: UK needs online eBay-style court for civil justice
An online court, similar to eBay's disagreement resolution service, should be set up to administer civil justice disputes in the UK, an official report has recommended. HM Courts & Tribunals Service should establish a new, internet-based court service, known as HM Online Court (HMOC) for disputes under £25,000, said the online …
COMMENTS
-
Monday 16th February 2015 13:13 GMT Busby
In my experience ebay's complaint resolution process is useless and seems designed to be exploited by scammers. 70 million cases handled and closed to ebay's satisfaction of those probably a minority reached what would be the correct result. So for gods sake don't model our justice system on that steaming turd!
-
Monday 16th February 2015 13:26 GMT Anonymous Coward
eBay's dispute resolution system has a very useful simple and effective system of handling complaints, as long as you happen to be the customer. The customer is always right, the seller is ALWAYS wrong. No matter what. The customer said the box was empty? Then the customer must be telling the truth. You care to express an alternative view? Sorry, all we could hear was a faint buzzing. Now bend over, Mr. Seller...
-
Monday 16th February 2015 13:28 GMT Anonymous Coward
Yes agreed, I got scammed by e-bay's dispute resolution service.
They seemed to avoid telling me that after 30 days the case will be closed regardless of whether the other party has fulfilled his end of the deal and that they refuse to re-open it.
As a scammer all you do is sell and expensive item, don't describe it correctly so a dispute is opened. Stall for time until agreeing to have the item returned stall for more time and don't sign for return delivery. Time it right and the case gets closed - you lose your money and the goods.
I even explained this scenario to the e-bay guy on the phone and he agreed that it was entirely possible.
In my case e-bay could see from the tracking number that I had returned the goods and could see from pay-pal that I wasn't refunded yet but still closed the case automatically and wouldn't re-open it. In the end I stopped using e-bay and they lost way, way more in fees.
-
Tuesday 17th February 2015 05:25 GMT big_D
c't magazine, in Germany, has a bi-weekly section on readers having difficulty with companies. Telcos, as a whole, probably make up the most claims, but fleaBay and ScamPal make up the most complaints for a specific company. And it is often the customer getting the bum's rush and the seller sailing off into the sunset.
-
-
-
Monday 16th February 2015 14:32 GMT MrXavia
Re: What about evidence ?
there is such as thing as post?
I can see you open a claim online, opposing party has the chance to resolve without involving anyone else, if not escalate to independent adjudicator, post in any evidence/scan and send also...
The problem I see is that the other party will still not pay up if they loose....
and innocents will be trolled for money, taken to court JUST to trick them into paying with threats of bailiffs....
-
Monday 16th February 2015 16:09 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: What about evidence ?
When I saw the headline, I immediately wondered how this could possibly work.
In retrospect, and online facility could be a good way to reduce the cost and loss of work etc for the purely administrative side of the law.
On the other hand, the threat of having to go to court might sometimes pursuade the parties to come to agreement beforehand.
On the other, other hand, the threat of going to court can often be a disincentive to the legitimate complainant to bother at all.
-
-
-
Monday 16th February 2015 13:24 GMT Derichleau
This would be ideal for contract disputes. Think how many companies require you to accept or agree to a privacy policy for example. But a company must process your personal data in accordance with the all UK data protection laws and regulations and no acceptance or agreement of a privacy policy is going to change that.
-
Monday 16th February 2015 13:38 GMT Otto is a bear.
Probably never used eBay
Let alone the disputes process.
Mind you I used it, the seller said, oops my mistake, keep the goods and I'll send the right stuff immediately, and they did.
I see this as being a great opportunity for Capita/Serco/G4S to make lots of money, to win all you need to do is buy their shares.
I also think the digital advisor who thought this one up knows sweet FA about the management of evidential data, and has no idea how easy it is to fake digital documents.
-
Monday 16th February 2015 13:48 GMT Anonymous Coward
Conflicting interests
Lawyers spinning out work in order increase their own revenue vs Engineers trying to find the best & quickest system to help legal resolutions.
A logical system that applies a single rule set to everyone vs Judges.
This system is going to get mired in red tape if it ever gets past the committee mauling.
-
Monday 16th February 2015 22:54 GMT Robin Szemeti
We're doomed
Scammers use the ebay "resolution" process in both directions ... the sellers who send empty boxes, and then just produce the tracking ID to ebay, case closed ... and buyers who return empty boxes, with a tracking ID .. money refunded, cased closed.
There is however one thing you can be certain of, eBay never, EVER loses. The buyer may lose, the seller may lose, but eBay never loses.
Same with an online justice system ... you can be sure that the lawyers, or their digital counterparts will come up winning every time.