Fairly sure the Aliens, Santa Clauses, and Space Nazi's won't like this.
Human DNA 'will be found on moon' – Brian Cox
A UK nonprofit, funded via Kickstarter – and endorsed by famous rockstar TV boffin Brian Cox – aims to land a robot probe (a probot, as some call them) on the Moon: one with an unusual purpose. And the team is sure that if the mission is a success, there will be human DNA at the site. CGI image of Lunar Mission One on the …
COMMENTS
-
-
-
Friday 21st November 2014 19:45 GMT Anonymous Coward
Not a a Nazi, just common sense.............
What a load of toss this whole article is, to be honest, in fact the whole mission. The ONLY way they'll find human DNA on the moon is because the bloody rocket plonked it there!!!
Sorry, one possible exceptions are that if you consider all those ancient monuments on the moon, we could have been there already in a previous civilisation or else we arrived here via the moon, à la courtesy of our alien overlords. Oh, and one more possibility, Appollo 11-17 astronaut poo.
No?!!!!
Really?!!!
What, we were spawned from comets? What a load of complete and utter crap! More like the comets picked up a bit of organic molecules from the detritis thrown up violently from planets due to direct hits from asteroids and comets, not the other way around.
I wish someone would me pay me loads of research £$€ to come up with fanciful ideas that gullible idiots are keen to swallow hook, line and sinker.
Sigh.....................................
-
Wednesday 26th November 2014 09:07 GMT Darren Forster
Probably DNA up there already...
Sorry to disappoint Brian Cox on this amazing achievement but surely someone with his immense knowledge should have worked out by now that there probably is already DNA somewhere on the moon already.
There is also most probably human DNA also on mars, and somewhere out in very deep space, and also at this present time riding the back of a comet.
Any time we've sent stuff up into space people have touched the items we've sent into space and infected the item with their own DNA at some point, even the hubble space telescope that has gone into deep space possibly has human DNA attached to it, and recently the probe that landed on the comet would have human DNA on it.
Unless all these devices were wiped absolutely spotlessly clean of all human DNA before being sent up (which is highly unlikely), then there will already be human DNA up there somewhere.
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 12:04 GMT Matthew Smith
Wheres the ambition?
Considering that the payoff to this mission isn't for another 10 years, its all a bit underwhelming. If this was to happen on a moon around one of the outer planets, or the base unit was mobile and could sample from multiple sites, then I would get on board. As it is, it all feels like something that could have been done in 1974, never mind the space year 2024. Good luck to them anyway, but I can imagine a couple of Chinese astronauts sat on a rock nearby watching everything take place.
-
Thursday 20th November 2014 07:16 GMT imanidiot
Re: Wheres the ambition?
They are planning a relatively deep core drilling, which requires a lot of extra equipment over a single core drill. I doubt they would be able to get this to work in the 70s. However, I agree making it a stationary station kind of dulls the whole thing to less than meh.
-
Thursday 20th November 2014 10:00 GMT toxicdragon
Re: Wheres the ambition?
Why are people like you never happy? This project has a robot/probot/whatever which makes it cool, it will then take place on another planet which makes it cooler, and then it will do something that is a great challenge, that makes it both even cooler and something worthwhile. Learn to love the world a bit.
-
-
-
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 13:04 GMT Doctor_Wibble
Re: Christ on a bike!
Or better yet, use it to make some clones for initial analysis before making a final decision on just what sort of farm the planet needs to be. Keeping Earth as more or less free-range might be OK as long as there's a sufficient market for that sort of thing but if it turns out that breeding factories and a production line are what is needed to ensure an adequate supply then that would involve a fairly convoluted planning application for change of use, not to mention the inevitable human rights protesters and activists getting in the way...
Sorry, I never could resist the old alien 'we are humanitarians we only eat humans' joke...
-
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 14:58 GMT MassiveBob
Re: Christ on a bike!
Sounds like a bad idea to me...
It will only take a few hundred years for the human hair to evolve into mutated giant humanoid cockroaches that will attack and kill any humans that tries to land on the moon.
The last time, this happened on Mars and it did not turn out pretty...
-
-
-
-
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 18:50 GMT Simon Harris
Re: Probot?
2003? You're a bit late to the party. I first heard the word Probot in about 1994. It's what we called our automatic Prostate Resection Robot partly developed by me in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Imperial College - see here:
-
-
-
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 13:39 GMT VinceH
Since the article doesn't include it, here's the link to the actual Kickstarter page.
While the whole time capsule nonsense is going to attract a lot of scorn from the readership of sites like El Reg, it's worth considering that it's really just a means to an end: a way to provide some kind of incentive to Joe
ChavPublic to get him to stump up some money to help fund the project. Without that incentive, JoeChavPublic would see the project and think "Meh".What should be more important to those of us who aren't like Joe
ChavPublic is the scientific aspect of the mission.Listen to what Brian Cox says at about 3:50 into the video - paraphrased, it's "The key thing for me is that everybody can say 'I think we should explore space, I want to increase human knowledge, and know how the solar system formed.'"
And that, sadly, is almost exactly what Joe
ChavPublic won't think - and there probably aren't enough of us who do think that when it comes to crowdfunding something like this, so providing a silly incentive gets JoeChavPublic on board.Sad, but c'est la vie.
-
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 15:20 GMT Mike Flugennock
Re: Human DNA on Moon
Good point. Iirc, prior to LM liftoff, the crews dumped a bunch of unneeded stuff onto the surface, including used-up PLSS packs and other assorted trash including urine/fecal bags.
This Cox guy is supposed to be such a big-shot scientist; why doesn't he know about that?
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 19:01 GMT Simon Harris
Re: Human DNA on Moon
"DNA is safe in the vacuum of space."
Some people might beg to differ...
-
Friday 21st November 2014 10:27 GMT MachDiamond
Re: Human DNA on Moon
DNA is not likely to survive intact on the surface of the moon. Since there is no geological activity on the moon, there isn't a good mechanism for it migrating down on its own.
When one complicates the problems by specifying "Human" DNA, the probe better be able to process the entire volume of the moon and discount materials found at any of the lander sites since the differences between human DNA and DNA from any other living thing is not a very large difference. One would need several (or many) complete strands before there would be enough data points to say that "human" DNA was found.
Screw the probes, it's time to found Luna City and HKL and then there definitely will be Human DNA on the moon (or IN the moon as the case may be).
-
-
-
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 17:27 GMT Stevie
Bah!
I would like to propose an alternate scheme, wherein sponsors submit photos that are used to make high-relief etched plates. These are fastened to the blunt snout of the spacecraft, which is driven at maximum revs into the lunar regolith, stamping the likenesses into the green cheese for all eternity.
No harpoons or drills needed.
-
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 18:52 GMT The Indomitable Gall
Re: WILL THIS BE BRIANS LEGACY?
"has this fuck actually contributed to science or has he just passed a load of exams?"
The former. Exams finish at MSc level, and you get a chair (professorship) based on your academic weight. You can look up some of his papers, if you like. I don't know what the ATLAS project is, but I'm pretty certain he's using the LHC at CERN for more than just high-energy Scalectrix...
http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Author/23398545
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 20:47 GMT Martin-73
Re: WILL THIS BE BRIANS LEGACY?
You may not personally like him, but I am fairly sure he's inspired a few kids and members of other age groups to take a 2nd and maybe 3rd look at science as a career, so, especially in comparison to someone whose only achievement so far is calling him a 'fuck' anonymously on the internet, I'd say he's contributed :)
-
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 22:23 GMT John Jennings
Atlas was one of the detectors used in the race to detect the Higgs Boson (actually, it was the detector which actually found it). He also worked at one of its predecessors, HERA (in Hambourg)
Cox (according to Wpedia) is a professor (physics),
he has degree in Physics, Masters (same) PhD (same) , and is a fellow of the Royal Society. oh and has an OBE (so to the AC, you can call him Sir :) )
The exams are the least of it. You might not like him (appears fashionable, here) but he has fairly transformed the British medias presentation of science. These days, there isnt a science presenter with a fraction of his chops - David Attenborough is old, Patrick Moore was good perhaps 20 years ago, and is dead....
-
Wednesday 3rd December 2014 17:56 GMT Mike Flugennock
I rather enjoyed James Burke
His series The Day The Universe Changed was picked up by PBS in the States in the early '80s, right about the same time that Sagan's Cosmos was becoming popular. We were also getting Attenborough's program(me)s about the same time as well; those were also excellent.
-
Wednesday 19th November 2014 22:43 GMT razorfishsl
Great…..
Not only have we polluted the Earth but now we are dumping spunk filled tubes on the moon.
Holidaying in the UK, the nightmare was always to digup or find a spunk filled jonny on the sands, some time in the future space tourists holidaying on the moon will also have that pleasure.
-
Thursday 20th November 2014 01:02 GMT Vociferous
"The team behind the mission don’t really say much about the wisdom of sticking a load of human DNA on an extraterrestrial body"
On the moon? Doesn't matter at all. It's a dead rock. Even if it wasn't, there isn't anything desiccated DNA can get up to on its own.
Also, if the hair is left on the surface, the radiation will break down the DNA in the hair in a couple of decades.
-
Thursday 20th November 2014 08:19 GMT Anonymous Coward
Would you believe someone who says Humans are the only Intellgent life form in the Universe??
Shame on him - I think the headline defining him as a "rock star" is perfect.
No serious academic would make such a statement.
He probably hasn't watched any of the thousands of UFO clips on youtube and thinks that crop circles
were formed by two men with a rope and a plank in complete darkness after they been drinking in their local Pub.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6M6vP8-SbU0
This is just a ruse to con Joe Public into coughing up even more of his hard earned cash.
-
Thursday 20th November 2014 10:27 GMT Loony Moony
I am concerned that this will contaminate a virgin planet. There may well already be some form of bacterial DNA present in the lunar strata, but its validity for any analytical purposes will be nil if the vessel carrying contaminants is fractured. So please keep your greasy locks of the moon until we have analysed it.