Any person that uses the words "kids" and "paedophiles" in their comments is guilty of blatant scaremongering and attempted distraction from Their Own Evilness (tm)
IRONY ALERT: Former MI6 chief warns of 'mass snooping' - by PAEDOS
The former head of MI6 has warned parents that paedophile predators are capable of using location-based services to find and abuse their kids. In a warning that might sound a bit rich coming from a former chief spook, Sir John Scarlett said he was worried about how easily a youngster's movements could be traced. Young girls …
COMMENTS
-
-
-
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 09:16 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Extraordinary claims
Quote: "But we are a law-based state operating very tightly within a legal framework”
That one definitely requires some serious extraordinary proof. Especially from the only other state in Europe besides Belarus which finds human rights so inconvenient that it wants to abolish any oversight on them.
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 09:20 GMT Tom 64
Re: Extraordinary claims
“But we are a law-based state operating very tightly within a legal framework”
Do they really thing we were all born yesterday? I seem to remember uk.gov rushing through a law before the recess of parliament because what the snoops were doing was deemed to be illegal by the EC court of Justice.
I wonder if this has anything at all to do with the recent support the UKIP has been getting.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 12:01 GMT Colin Brett
Re: Extraordinary claims
"Wow! And all this time I'd been thinking Spiderman's true identity was Peter Parker. It must have been a cunning bluff, obviously."
So, does that mean Cherie Blair was Mary-Jane Watson and/or Gwen Stacy.
Fire icon because there go my boyhood dreams up in smoke.
Colin
-
-
-
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 09:49 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: I'd like Sir John Scarlett to name one case where that's happened.
There are many examples of MI6 staff using their snooping powers to spy on young children, unfortunately they are classified so details can't be released to the public.
This is a request for more snooping powers so that they can spy on the children that a currently out of their reach.
-
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 08:39 GMT SolidSquid
You know, spending a lot of money to put together a fairly innocuous app which is good enough to end up popular purely so that you can use it to track people's location isn't exactly the most straight forward (or cheap) way of following someone. I wonder where the former head of MI6 got the idea
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 08:52 GMT Anonymous Coward
Unlikely scenario: John Q Nonce thinks "She's hot! I'm going to write me a Facebook to find out where she is!"
More common scenario: Robert Policeman thinks "She's hot! I'm going to look up her vehicle registration and personal records!"
(but it's Ok, because we're very good at weeding out bad apples and never mislead the public)
-
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 08:52 GMT Buzzword
Please specify the nature of your menace
What exactly is the danger here? A paedophile somehow gets access to a kid's location data, identifies times & places where he/she is likely to be alone, and then pounces?
Kids are most often found walking alone to or from school, around 8am and 4pm. There, no hacking needed.
-
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 09:05 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Unrelated question
The simple answer is that the hoi polloi are being distracted by pursuing people like DLT while the purveyors of children in care, from Elm House for instance, are being carefully forgotten as much as possible.
If I didn't know better I'd think that some sort of conspiracy was in action.
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 10:25 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Unrelated question@Brian Morrison
"If I didn't know better I'd think that some sort of conspiracy was in action."
Pah! You're the sort of person who thinks there's a nefarious reason why the Chilcott Enquiry hasn't been published, when any right-thinking supporter of parliamentary democracy can see that the hold up is merely that the copier is out of paper.
But, the strategy of denial and cover up evidently works, so next up we'll have a prime minister waving a dossier that says that IS are a clear and present danger to the UK, and we must send our ground forces to defeat them. This is inevitable as the RAF's two operational Tornados have thus far only managed to score a couple of pick up trucks (at a cost of £1.5m for each Brimstone missile used). If it's a war of attrition with IS, we'll be bankrupt before they are, but the post-Syria investigation will likewise be subject to a "dog ate my homework" excuse.
-
-
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 10:37 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: jobs for pervs
It was once said that the security services didn't care what a person's predilections were - as long as they knew about them. Their interest presumably was any potential blackmail by enemy agents.
It is interesting that a blackmailer's only weapon is the disapproving attitudes of the victim's society.
-
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 09:25 GMT A Twig
so, tracking "right down to more or less precisely where you are”.
Eh?
I've read that sentence and translated it in 3 different ways
1) I don't really have any figures but TRACKING!
2) The precision of the tracking is variable
3) The long and lat figures the tracker can get are to lots of decimal places, but the person might not actually be there. So it's precise but wrong.
Whichever of the above - Scarlett is still an arsehole...
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 10:06 GMT Raumkraut
The govt is mother, the govt is father, trust the govt
> But we are a law-based state operating very tightly within a legal framework and a cultural environment and that is where your protection must lie.
So our protection must lie in the following (non-exhaustive) list of groups all being entirely trustworthy and reliable (eg. not leaving documents on trains):
* This government, and every future government.
* Every judge who will ever authorise warrants.
* Every person who currently, or at any future time, works for the government.
* Every employee of the police service, present and future.
* Every security service agent, present and future.
Yeah, nah. I'd rather trust the mathematics.
-
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 15:46 GMT AbelSoul
Re: Obligatory Brass Eye paedo moral panic quote thread
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 10:31 GMT ForthIsNotDead
WTF has it got to do with MI6?
Isn't MI6 supposed to be concerned with protecting its citizens from threats that are external to the UK, like ISIS and stuff?
And America?
If some perv has logged onto your IP camera and is watching your kids sleep, it's hardly a job for MI6 is it? Disgusting as it is. It's a job for the police.
WOLF. THERE'S A WOLF!
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 22:06 GMT Mark 85
Re: WTF has it got to do with MI6?
Isn't MI6 supposed to be concerned with protecting its citizens from threats that are external to the UK, like ISIS and stuff?
And America?
You obviously didn't get the memo.... with certain exceptions that only Sir Scarlett has on a list , everyone, everywhere, except those living in the UK are paedos.
-
-
-
Saturday 25th October 2014 21:21 GMT HelpfulJohn
Re: Let this be a warning to you
I once invited a girl I liked the look of out for a drink. Exactly a year later, we got married. 31 years after that she still couldn't get rid of me.
Of course, she was a working girl, not a schoolgirl ... Uhn, sorry, a working *Lady*. No, that still sounds iffy ...
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 12:05 GMT Anonymous Coward
Goodwins law needs revision
Subjects you are not meant to question.
Peado has become one of them, if you ask any question beyond the use of the word you obviously are one right?
You must not think! you must pick up a stick and get ready to beat the next person we point at and invoke the word.
KJP (Knee Jerk Phrases).
Keep thinking, keep wondering who has invoked a KJP "you must not think" phrase.
I think the general sexualisation of society with special mention for advertising is a far greater threat to our children than the fiddlers.
There are indeed many modern risks to a childs well being, we just don't get to hear much about those that might damage business income.
“Peados” I assume are not (officially) big party funders so that is a safe one to use.
-
Friday 3rd October 2014 13:19 GMT Sir Runcible Spoon
Re: Goodwins law needs revision
Considering the wide-ranging definitions of what constitutes KP I'm amazed that the Americans allow those 'Put your 4 year old child on stage in a skimpy outfit doing a crotch-thrusting pole-dance routine to win one of 100 crowns' type shows.
And showing them on TV is KP publication isn't it?
-
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 12:11 GMT DrXym
I think it's a fair point to some extent
It's easy to see how kids (and adults) might be exposing themselves to risk without even realising it - tweeting what they're doing, or using apps which divulge their location like Foursquare or uploading photos with geotag data
For example search for "4sq.com" on twitter.com right now and you can find a wonderful selection of ladies and gentlemen to stalk. Or if you prefer, just rob their houses while they're out.
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 13:31 GMT Truffle
Re: I think it's a fair point to some extent
Very true.
My girlfriend isnt stupid. She can speak 3 languages and has a Masters degree in International Communication. But i still had to stop her from posting up every detail of our recently booked holiday onto Facebook.
She hadn't considered that she was telling people exactly when my house would be empty and for how long for!
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 15:05 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: I think it's a fair point to some extent
I understand that it's a smart precaution to take...
But if you're afraid that someone on your list of friends on facebook will rob your house while you're away, then maybe your friend list needs some revising.
Unless she was making public posts about it, which is a whole other ball game that I can't even begin to relate to.
-
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 16:49 GMT JaitcH
“But we are a law-based state operating very tightly within a legal framework and a ...
cultural environment and that is where your protection must lie.”
Another version of Trust Us.
Along with these law-based restrictions is the total absence of morals by GCHQ such as copying Yahoo selfies, etc.
The UK has, effectively, no independent oversight, either - just retired stiffs like Rifkind who approved most applications he was asked for.
-
Thursday 2nd October 2014 22:48 GMT Mark 85
Seriously interesting comments both the Lord and the commentards
It just strikes me that the esteemed Lord's comments might be a smoke screen. I've observed over the years that when a "leader" speaks one needs to look or listen deeper. Too many anti-gay legislators were themselves gay, a certain Germanic leader was of Jewish descent... a certain US FBI director and his gay friends and dress-up... certain leaders of the UK and US and their personal relationships that brought them down. OTOH, certain leaders have spoke about things like child abuse only because they were victims themselves at a young age.
So... what's the esteemed Lord hiding since his positions haven't been involved in child abuse? I'm not slinging muck, I'm curious what his motivation is.