Slightly OT
How come http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/04/02/lohan_rehab_tests/ does not appear in http://www.theregister.co.uk/Wrap/lohan/?
Tagging issue?
Our Low Orbit Helium Assisted Navigator (LOHAN) Vulture 2 spaceplane has taken a massive leap in transmitting power with the installation of a mighty 900MHz ultra long range radio module - the RFD 900u Radio Modem by Oz's RF Design. the RFD 900 rig The diminutive module plugs straight into the Pixhawk autopilot, replacing …
How come http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/04/02/lohan_rehab_tests/ does not appear in http://www.theregister.co.uk/Wrap/lohan/?
Tagging issue?
This post has been deleted by its author
The 900MHz option is probably only USA. Illegal in EU.
900MHz doesn't exactly need LOS, but all UHF (400MHz to 1200MHz approx) has HUGELY BETTER range LOS than not. Obviously too the 470MHz TV gives better non-LOS coverage than 790MHz TV. TV used to be up to 862MHz.
In EU there is licence free SRD in 864MHz to 868MHz. But it's low power. (SRD = Short Range Device) similar to 433MHz allocation. The EU 446MHz allows more power but only with built in aerial walkie talkies, not random function devices such as 433MHz (usually wireless weather stations, door bells and IR remote extenders, such as back channel on 2.4GHz video senders).
In general there are few Radio transmitting gadgets that are able to be EU (CE) and USA (FCC) legal. Amateur Radio doesn't have to use approved equipment for full licence in most of EU so USA 420 to 450 MHz equipment can be used by Full Licence people in most of EU as long as they only transmit in 430 MHz to 440MHz band.
Note: Just because you can easily buy a transmitting gadget doesn't make it sensible or legal in your own country.
Acknowledging that you probably *don't* want high gain and the associated high directionality (that may end up pointed away from you) for the mobile platform, but that said - the little rubber ducky antenna doesn't look all that good in terms of wasteful loss at 900 MHz. First thing to look at if you need "MORE POWER!!!!" (JC/TG).
If you can predict the geometry then you might be able to add some appropriate directionality (gain), such as a CSC^2 pattern.
The ground antenna could be a high gain Yagi-Uda antenna, if you're willing to aim it in the general direction of the vehicle.
There's also the concept of Good Enough. If what you've got works, then you're done.
AC: "Don't power up the RFD900 without both antenna connected. Radios powered without antenna can suffer irreparable damage!"
Seems like an odd claim...
OEM website: "...it is OK to have only one antenna connected"
I had to go check, because it would be rather odd for a low power transmitter (1 watt in this case) to be using such a weak device that an open or short circuit would damage it. It's a flea, and it can't generate enough voltage (roughly 10) to hurt itself.
It's rather trivial to design low power transmitters to be indestructible w.r.t. loads *anywhere* on the Smith chart. Anyone that fails to do so should have a very good reason. Not just laziness.
Fascinating to see the project gradually change from garden shed engineering to something that starts looking like real work. A couple more steps down this slippery slope and Lester is heading a bureaucracy that will make NASA look like amateurs. You can do it Lester!