back to article Violin Memory FINALLY writes dedupe and compression into its latest Concerto

Violin Memory has fixed a gaping hole in its data management feature set by adding deduplication and compression to its Concerto memory array controller product. This will cut its effective cost/GB figures to new lows, and strengthens its competitive hand against other all-flash array vendors – such as EMX XtremIO, IBM …

  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    really?

    Was there a queue of people who wanted to buy a Violin appliance but thought the latency was just too darned low? It's only a gaping hole if the people who understood Violin products actually wanted it, and generally they didn't which is why it took so long. This is the kind of feature that wouldn't be added in a world without shareholders, or even a world where all the people with budget understood what they were buying...

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: really?

      Well said. When you stuff 70TB of raw flash in 3U, de-dupe doesn't have to exactly be in your playbook, especially in the database workload market where nobody is thinking they have to have de-dupe. However, all of the "me too" players who are building smaller, cheaper boxes with less flash totally polluted the reality of the value of de-dupe to the customer, so Violin needs this feature set to speak to customers competitively. Right or wrong, customers have it in their head. They have 20 vendors saying de-dupe matters, and only Violin was saying it is not critical. Both sides were partially wrong, but for purposes of their own agenda.

      Ironically, all the "me too's" had to use de-dupe to compete with Violin initially because their boxes have way less flash inside. Look at their spec sheets. Nobody else is selling anywhere near 70TB in 3U. De-dupe gave the "me-too's" an opportunity to maximize the effective capacity of their smaller box, and then it became a thorn in the side for Violin. That game is over now, so the next 4 quarters should be interesting for Violin in de-dupe centric work load deals.

      If you are a massive company with performance on your mind, you just buy tens of arrays from Violin and go back to sleep. You don't even think about de-dupe, but so many data center decision makers are so misinformed on the all-flash thing. Violin's biggest problem is their arrays are lasting so long in the data center. They need to play that 3-year upgrade cycle game like everyone else instead of selling awesome technology that will last for 7-10 years in the data center. If they came up with a sh!tty and cheaper product, they would be doing much better. Look at Pure kicking ass with a sh!t product.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020