"Hairy Jedi snot."
Priceless.
On stage, the presenter barely pauses for breath as he shares his extraordinary knowledge with rapid-fire delivery. His audience is captivated, amazed, enthralled. Digital design students all, they are learning from a master of online retail what life is like at the cutting edge of user interaction, giving them a hint of the …
There's an adage about someone ha d a car breakdown, and a mechanic came out, worked out the symptoms and then said to the owner "that'll be £200, please".
"£200" goes the owner. "Thats ridiculous!". I want an invoice in writing with a breakdown of why I'm being charged so much.
So later he gets the breakdown:
Labour charge: 10 mins - £20
Knowing where to deploy hammer - £180
"Boll. Oh-see-kay-ess."
That sounds more like someone starting to call out bollocks, but half way through they suddenly realise/understand what the speaker is saying and then agreeing with them in an embarrassed manner.
"Boll... oh, [I] see, [o]kay, [y]es."
Having a dig at Sting's punctuation is a bit rich considering how badly you mangled Yoda-speak :)
However, I have to sympathize with the overall article simply because I too am a hooligan.
I managed to seriously upset a senior director of Checkpoint during a presentation on HMS Belfast.
Everyone else in the room was director level, and my director at the time decided he couldn't be arsed to go so he sent me :D
I asked some very awkward questions about their licensing model and how the CP liked to assume that every address it could see on the wire must constitute a host, regardless of whether or not it actually traverse the firewall.
In the end his response was basically "It just is, and I designed it". Since he was so belligerent (I had been very polite in my questioning) I got a bit annoyed and asked him one more question..
"Surely by having such a model you are just going to encourage people to employ a proxy in front of the firewall so it only ever sees a handful of IP addresses rather than a couple of hundred?"
All the directors in the room were suddenly all ears and the guy on the podium was looking daggers..lovely :) Mind you, I was never asked to go to another one.
""Surely by having such a model you are just going to encourage people to employ a proxy in front of the firewall so it only ever sees a handful of IP addresses rather than a couple of hundred?"
All the directors in the room were suddenly all ears and the guy on the podium was looking daggers..lovely :) Mind you, I was never asked to go to another one."
Job done.
You mean Director don't come to these things to learn useful stuff to save their companies money?
The guy on the podium was probably annoyed because
A/ "Everyone else in the room was director level" - there's your first clue.
B/ His presentation was aimed at a director level.
C/ If you wanted to chew over the specs, go see him afterwards, *then* tell your directors what you thought.
D/ The directors were not all ears, most of them probably had no idea what you were on about, and expect this kind of discussion to be held elsewhere when it's not occupying their time. If they'd wanted to sit through a technical review they'd have asked you to attend directly, not your director.
@Just Enough
I can assure you that (technical) directors can become quite attentive when talking about large sums of money and how they are being ripped off, and how they could possible avoid it.
I didn't start going into the protocol details or anything 'high brow' - my comments weren't aimed at the guy on the podium after all.
Were you actually there? The guy was annoyed because I was highlighting something that he would have preferred to go unmentioned, this was not lost on the 'directors'.
Your assumptions about my ability to communicate at CEO level and also about 'Directors' not understanding anything more technical than a kettle reveals a good deal about your own mind, peon.
> The one thing that a pun is supposed to do is sound like another word. Sting's pun doesn't even have the same number of syllables.
Sorry to be a Yoda about this, but ... the original Canterbury Tales contains both 'Somonour' and 'Somnour' so there is precedence for pronouncing Summoner with two syllables and a silent 'o'. Mind you, Chaucer was a 'slogardie tuwel' when it came to spelling.
According to the internet Surname Database, the surname Sumner was derived from 'Summoner' in the days when surnames matched the occupation. http://www.surnamedb.com/Surname/Sumner . In speech it was probably easier to say 'sumner' rather than 'summoner', in the same way that 'governor' becomes shortened to 'guvnor'. Mine's the one with the OED (concise) in the pocket.
Umm, Dabbsy - not to heckle too much here, but... the name Sumner comes directly from the occupation Summoner. It's a contraction (yeh, without an apostrophe) that happened somewhere in Olde Englande or whatever - Sting actually explained it at the time the album was released.
In fact there's nothing wrong with the punctuation of the album title, it tells you there are 10 tales from one summoner.
OK, I'll take the bait...
'Ten Summoner's' Tales is 'correct' in as much that it's an album by a single 'Summoner' (actually a pun on Sumner, Sting's real surname, just in case no-one knew) for which there are multiple 'tales'. Of course, it doesn't help that the album has twelve 'tales' on it...
Now waiting for down votes and explanations why I'm wrong...
Chaucer wrote The Somonours Tale, I believe. No apostrophe for Geoff. I don't understand where Sting's alleged error lies, though. If there is one Summoner, and he has ten tales, then are they not properly grammatically described by the noun phrase Ten Summoner's Tales?
Edit: I see I am not the first PGN to hit Submit! Didn't know that about the Summoner/Sumner thing, though. That's illuminating.
It may be "proper" but it is still "questionable". In terms of grammatical pedantry, "Ten Summoner's Tales" is correct. It is, however, questionable: despite being attractively concise in its three words, "Ten Summoner's Tales" is an awkward way of both (1) declaring that there is such a thing as a Summoner's Tale and (2) that there are ten of them.
It is also grammatically correct to walk into a cafe and order "one eggs and bacon" once you have established that "eggs and bacon" refers a named item on the menu rather than, oh I dunno, simply some eggs and bacon on a plate, but I would argue that the grammar, although explicable, is questionable.
@Dabbsy: "It may be "proper" but it is still "questionable". In terms of grammatical pedantry, "Ten Summoner's Tales" is correct. It is, however, questionable: despite being attractively concise in its three words, "Ten Summoner's Tales" is an awkward way of both (1) declaring that there is such a thing as a Summoner's Tale and (2) that there are ten of them."
ehhhhh... OK
I think that puts your grammatical nazism a bit to the right of mine though ;-)
I appear to be suffering from a severe case of grocers' apostrophitis at the moment. I come back to El Reg to see if anyone's replied to my posts, only to find that I've used who's and it's, instead of whose and its. It's terrible.
Seems to be a typing tic, rather than my brain forgetting all the grammar that I wasn't taught in english lessons. Fortunately my latin teacher, who failed to force much latin into my head, did manage to teach me how to solve the Telegraph crossword alond with some grammar. I can't type London, without first typing Lodno and then correcting. Similarly confustion is an almost inevitable typo, but I quite like it as a word.
I do hope not, having a commentard handle of "Irongut"
You object to firm abdominals in your nude starlets?
I assume Irongut looks like Emilia Clarke. Based on the data I have, that seems like the best assumption.1
1N.B. I did not write "the most probable assumption". Even a Bayes reasoner needs to take the occasional liberty.
" they are absolutely convinced that they could do it better and aren’t shy in letting everyone else know. The thing is, we bleedin’ Yodas talk the talk but, given the opportunity, we’d fumble the stumble. Sports fans? Nah, my little ball of hairy Jedi snot – we’re hooligans."
Dearest Dabbsy:
Love your stuff, but isn't the above EXACTLY what we do here, day in and day out?
"some fucking Yoda with tourettes on the back row, repeatedly calling out from the safety of his fake-velvet upholstered conference chair"
"commence an interminable monologue about OS/2"
"Yoda, naturally, remained silent. The piss just taking was he. Bastard the."
I don't understand why I don't get invited to the trade shows anymore.
Where a single question can show the speaker to be both incompetent and a danger to others with a single question.
A single question like: So, about that final design. That rear leg is about 80 mm in diameter right? Thick walled tube probably? Have you thought about the buckling load? (Speaker had very confidently stated that all loads were within limits with a design some 50% under the normal weight of a competitors unit. The entire audience immediately knew what was meant, and most instinctively knew the rear leg would buckle like a match. There were several other design flaws I wouldn't expect a first year student to make)
The equivalent exists in the world of IT, usually by people who put the word "cyber" in their title.
The real trick is having enough people witness the question who are clueful for the ripple of understanding to take that anyone who needs to be a cyberanythingist is using it as a badge to hide how clueless they actually are on their subject matter.
Sweet when you drop the q bomb and it goes nuclear, frustratiing the rest of the time.
but the last one I had in the UK was with someone who was touting to "facilitate" a SAP upgrade. A few direct questions and all it turns out all he does is introduce us to the actual company doing the work, pockets 20K for doing so and then disappears. When I pointed this out, I asked "Unless Company Y has no Customer Relationship Managers or Salespersons, why do we need you?".
I also asked about CPU / Memory Capacity (as SAP is notorious for gobbling resources) and he refused to give a specific figure (no doubt afraid I would take an estimate as gospel - hey, been there, had that happen). The techie he had with him (bless his heart) really blindsided the guy by bringing up a planning PDF from SAPNet, showing how much we would expect to burn, so I thanked him and said "So it's not orders of magnitude different to our current capacity but we will need to verify at a later stage". Fortunately I left the country before the project started, so avoided that particular "hospital pass".
"With this comes the realisation that IT people are like couch-potato sports fans: no matter what the pros are doing, they are absolutely convinced that they could do it better and aren’t shy in letting everyone else know."
Every single place I ever worked.
And this is an insult to hooligans, They don't have to reluctantly and sheepishly look up on google how to cause mayhem.
Long years ago when I was a student we collectively played the Occarina Of Time on the house N64. Wow, that looks like a euphemism now I see it in writing. Hmmm.
Anyway, one thing we noticed was that whoever had the controller immediately became a total idiot- everyone else could easily accomplish whatever strategy we had just come up with but they kept crashing into walls, falling into lava or getting arbitrarily killed by bats. It was infuriating. The only thing more frustrating was when you got hold of the controller and suddenly it turned out you were the chump.
"With this comes the realisation that IT people are like couch-potato sports fans: no matter what the pros are doing, they are absolutely convinced that they could do it better and aren’t shy in letting everyone else know. "
Every single damn place I've ever worked.
You see, hooligan don't need to secretly and shamefully resort to google for the answers on how to cause mayhem. They are naturals at it.