Has Einstein been proved wrong? Iranian nuke next week? President in charge?
Will Redmond be able to resist?
Should this not be the headline?
Netcraft has updated its analysis of web server market share and found that Microsoft is now the world's dominant provider of such software, albeit with plenty of caveats. The traffic-watching firm says Apache is the leader in terms of active sites, with 91 million compared to Microsoft's 21 million. But Microsoft is all over …
So presumably IIS scales better and or costs less for multiple host name sites at least.
Certainly we have had far less to do to maintain our webservers since moving to IIS. Far fewer security vulnerabilities to evaluate and patch than with a LAMP stack for sure, and far easier to manage.
So presumably IIS scales better and or costs less for multiple host name sites at least.
Why do you post as AC? Why not use an handle, it makes copying and pasting from your previous posts much easier.
Heck I'm a MS user, but use a Linux Web server. Anyone that thinks their chosen OS is the best for everything is seriously deluded.
Link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm,
Link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm,
Link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm,
Link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm,
Link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm, link-farm,
<Sigh> I never thought I'd miss the old days...
Not really an accolade anyone sane would brag about ...
I seem to recall MS were offering incentives to hosting companies to push IIS, too, which might help explain this: if running a link-farm allows you to exploit both Google (by generating spurious web traffic and thus ad hits) and Microsoft (getting you whatever their reward is for hosting X sites on their platform), I'm sure the unscrupulous would jump at the chance.