On Hwy 121, between Sonoma & Napa ...
... I personally witnessed a sign stating "DANGER! Badgers and Hedgehogs crossing!"
Yes, I know how to do it, no it wasn't me.
If your commute to work today featured an electronic highway sign suggesting you do something odd, the presence of a default password in sign management software called Daktronics Vanguard may be to blame. ICS CERT points out that an early panic that the software possessed a hardwired password can be dismissed. But the …
Ah, if only the Motorway matrix signs required hacking, they can be nonsensical without any malicious help...
On a lonely stretch of the M6 miles from any service station or junction, I am advised to "Check Your Tyre Pressures"
What, now?? Do you want me to stop??
Or the even more obscure "Use the correct child seat". WTF??
The signs on the A1M regularly tell you to slow down because of accidents or traffic jams that turn out to be non-existent; I suppose the operators put up a message when something happens, but don't remove it when the problem has cleared. The effect is, of course, that no-one takes the slightest notice of the signs; if there were a real problem, the signs would not help: except that motorists could then be blamed for "not taking notice of the warning signs".
It means, "If you a parent you already know that child seats are made to carry children of a specific weight range called groups, and of course you don't need reminding to buy a new one from the next group up when your child becomes too heavy for the current group otherwise you'd be negligent. If you are not a parent you can ignore this message."
Now how you expect to get that across in an immediately understandable way on a motorway display with fewer characters than Twitter is another question. A they supposed to relay important information or just be a distraction which might require imaginative parsing while travelling at 70mph?
@hplasm Have to agree, always find large stretches of motorway have random queue or go slow messages and 7 out of 10 times nothing. The M11 is particularly annoying as it feels like for several junctions the same message is displayed and when you do get to an actual accident or something in the road everyone has sped up again.
@hplasm Have to agree, always find large stretches of motorway have random queue or go slow messages and 7 out of 10 times nothing. The M11 is particularly annoying
Going northbound on the Oxfordshire / Warwickshire stretch of the M40 in the mornings, I've often seen warnings to slow down for an incident only to find nothing northbound but an apparent incident (well at least a jam of traffic) southbound. It's happened so often that I seriously wonder whether they've cross-wired the signs in the control centre.
It's an imperative sentence instructing the second person (pl. or sg., it's ambiguous in English) to place caution in a line or sequence.
As is usually the case with natural languages, and particularly with English, the parse is ambiguous. For example, it could also be an imperative addressed to "Queue" (which could be a proper noun1), instructing him or her to be careful, with the verb "exercise" (or similar) elided; or asking him or her to admonish some third party in the same regard.2
1"And these are our children, Queue and Stack."
2"Queue, would you please caution your brother? Stack's about to fall out of that tree. I don't want your mother to see him in a heap on the ground."
Policy by some road agencies is *not* to use the signs for generic safety messages like that... precisely because they are distracting and pose a safety risk. :-/
The UK and France are two exceptions that I can think of, where they love to spam you with bollocks.¹
¹ Ok, not bollocks. Just wrong time and place for that sort of driver education.
Ok, not bollocks. Just wrong time and place for that sort of driver education.
No, pretty much bollocks. The number of car owners who will only check their tire pressure after being reminded by a highway sign is likely to be vanishingly small, and the gradations of "approved" child car seats is wildly excessive. (Nearly all the statistical benefit of using child seats actually comes simply from getting the kids into the back seat and having them secured somehow, rather than bouncing loose around the cabin or sitting on someone's lap in the front.)
Driver-nagging messages are probably about as effective as "Baby on board" signs for improving motoring safety (i.e., not at all, particularly once the adverse effects of driver annoyance are factored in).
The ones Massachusetts purchased rarely have all character positions operable (even when new!). The number of available characters is so low, that most messages require multiple screens. The time between screens has been set to 5 seconds or so, resulting in only being able to read half the message before passing the sign. They seem to have popped up everywhere, they all have defects and some company is congratulating themselves for having carted off a shedload of cash while unloading a bunch of obsolete and defective merchandise at full list price.
Thankfully, the signs very rarely display useful information, more often the message is something along the lines of:
SLOW DOWN OR MOVE OVER FOR STOPPED EMERG VEHICLES ITS THE LAW
(^^^ you see a random third of this message)
USE YAH BLINKAH!
DRIVE DRUNK GO TO JAIL
Why can't they just leave the damn things off, unless they have something important to say? Seriously, if they're always displaying unimportant messages (no, not driving drunk is very important, but by now, we should all know that) don't people tend to ignore them after a while?
But security gets in the way of innovation; how can developers connect toilets to instagram when they have to waste time with pointless tasks like 'setting a password' or 'disabling unneeded services'
My son tells me that they started screening an ad in a US cinema after snoopily snooping somehow the numbers of all the cell phones in the audience, probably with the help of the carriers (or the NSA!).
At a critical point in the ad, which involved someone driving a car, they texted the entire audience. The critical point was about four seconds before the film showed a car crash from the driver's point of view.
If that's true, then it'd be a pretty effective campaign, I'd say
> after snoopily snooping somehow the numbers of all the cell phones in the audience
They haven't. They don't know the individual numbers. It's called Cell Broadcast as has always been part of the GSM standard, albeit I've never seen it used.
Good campaign though.
I hadn't seen the original article - I was just going on a report my eavesdropping paranoid 16 year old son had delivered. In the days where rotating MAC addresses and Blackphone handsets are a selling point for the social media and internet addicted teenage generation of today, they do seem to be quite conscious of how their publicly accessible tweets and facebook statuses can be intercepted en-route.
Having read the article kindly linked to by another commentard, I immediately recognised that they'd used cell broadcast. I too have never seen it used before.
You must live in a very dull vicinity. Just this afternoon I got one warning of flash flooding, and last year I got a couple giving tornado warnings.
My sister told me of an instance at work when a bunch of smartphone owners were congregating, and a warning came in. Most amusing, once everyone's heart rate had returned to normal.
* "I know what you did"
* "If you're going on holiday here, I'd turn around now. It's shit"
* "If you're driving an Audi I hope you die in a fireball of twisted metal (and you probably will, learn to sodding drive!)"
And my personal favourite:
* "Did you leave the gas on?"
OK, possibly* useful information if you are in London, but I fail to see the relevance 8,000 miles away where it is often displayed on a tunnel approach in Hong Kong.
* Well, not useful at all. How long will the tube be closed? Should I turn off now and take another route?
One of my favorite examples is on, IIRC, the Delaware Memorial Bridge (DE--MD, USA):
WIND CONDITIONS
Well, of course, you blockhead! If you're outdoors there are always wind conditions: breezy, still air, gale warning, approaching hurricane... which is it? If they just said ``WINDY'', they'd be specific, save ten characters, and and drivers could get their eyes back to the road sooner.