Re: What's more scary? Downtime or hackers?
That's a big question.
Usually switches are internal only, so it's much less risky. Hackers need access to something to be able to talk to the internal switches, and if they've gotten that far then you're probably exposed in several ways anyway.
Switches are probably one of the least patched things because they sit there and just work, and are normally configured to do nothing but pass traffic on the same LAN.
What is a hacker going to do to a switch - mirror a port and listen to all the traffic might be the worst. Then it depends if your internal communications are encrypted or not - generally environments are a mix of both. But again, if they're at that level you've probably got a bunch of doors open, not just the switch.
But again, it's a switch. If you're that worried have a single cold spare and patch them one at a time. You can't guarantee the network remains stable due to not running patches, that's bordering on negligence.