I see that TFL's boundary has grown...
Blackpool vs Middlesbrough is classed as being 'Around London' or is MS Azure using Apple maps for its data?
Microsoft has claimed that while the rest of the industry is falling for or projecting Internet of Things (IoT) hype, it is quietly delivering on the concept's promise right under many Reg readers' feet in the form of a new Azure-powered monitoring rig for the London Underground. Speaking at a press event in Sydney today, …
It's actually very funny: TfL are in the latter stages of migrating EVERYTHING they do away from proprietary software! Open Source now rules the roost. Boris couldn't believe the multi-million IT bills that TfL (Traffic for Losers) run up, so an edict was issued, and desktops are getting a strange, corporate Ubuntu spin.
Windows (and everything Microsoft) is seen by TfL as expensive, unreliable and insecure. They've recently had an IT security audit that made them panic.....
The 'Internet of things' surely relies on 'things' being on the internet. It's not clear if the "existing sensors" are separate entities accessible through the internet. If they are then as 'existing' sensors they already were an internet of things if not then then they just have an interface to a sensor array.
Also: Not sure where Azure comes in.
The Internet of Things is like Cloud, AI, Secure, Open, Privacy, Anonymous and scads of other terms that have emigrated from Marketing to IT.
Those terms don't have clearly defined meanings outside of small(ish) groups so you can make them mean whatever you like. It's not even doublespeak or dishonest. It is closer to gibberish, mental instability or someone providing you a Latin translator because you're going to Belize. No matter what you think is being said the speaker and the person beside you can interpret it differently unless everyone involved has previously agreed to use the same definition.
I've generally found that the best way to deal with it is apply your own definition and use that as the basis for any questions you send back upstream. It's fun and exciting (<---There's two more) and as a rule any time someone has absconded with the reasonable definition it is because the subject isn't remotely fun or exciting, so it's win win for you.
Actually it IS different. It must be or Don would claim he invented it! The problem is that the 'difference' is buried deep down in the technology and hard for marketing to explain.
Data has been gathered from sensors since sensors existed, its how you collect, manage and disseminate that to the right people in the right form at the right price that is the core to IoT.