YORP? Really? Naming something that terribly could only be the result of a women's health product focus group, or alien conspirators who have infiltrated the astronomy field in an attempt to cover up the imminent arrival of more landing craft if, as in this case, they were accidentally spotted. Even the lamest Human astrophysicist could come up with something better than "it's like, spinning man, really fast and parts are flying off". The fact this kind of stuff is printed in the media is just proof that they're in on it too.
'Weird' OBJECT, PROPELLED by its OWN JETS, spotted beyond Mars orbit by Hubble
A bizarre spinning object, described by NASA as "weird and freakish" and shooting jets of matter that cause it to move, has been spotted in our Solar System. The mysterious rock, located in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, was seen spewing matter from its surface by the Hubble space telescope on September 10. Then …
-
-
-
-
Monday 11th November 2013 14:57 GMT FrozenFlame
Re: Erm...
I read it as the sun would make the object rotate fast and faster until it started to break apart under it's own centrifugal force, at which point, the gas would be released from the asteroid in the form of jets thus causing the propulsion seen. It would then not be spinning as it was originally due to the sudden propulsion in one direction.
-
-
Friday 8th November 2013 03:10 GMT JamesTQuirk
Monster mash
I think its a conglomerate ball of rock/ice, mostly rocky surface, but gaps for some ice fields, these when rotating into sun light, these outgas, as it spins, it looks like a sprinkler ......
OR it is a alien mining ship, using a process we dont understand, strip mining our asteroid field, to build a robot army to kick our butts !!!! Get your tinfoil hats on now, before it's too late !!!
-
Friday 8th November 2013 03:35 GMT aqk
Maybe it's an MS spin?
What no anti-Win8 diatribe yet?
Where is everyone?
Surely this rocky object is just blowing off gases (sort of like tossing chairs) into empty space, and is thus rotating its way slowly back to Windows-7 (or perhaps XP) where the large majority of antediluvian Register readers reside...
-
-
Friday 8th November 2013 04:44 GMT Wzrd1
Re: Maybe it's an MS spin?
However, if it spins on without any change for an extremely long amount of time, it's obviously be *BSD.
If it spins with massive changes over rather short periods, it's obviously Linux.
If it spins, then switches about a few times, with massive deleterious changes, it's obviously Macintosh.
-
-
-
Friday 8th November 2013 05:17 GMT Anonymous Coward
First example?
"Since the pressure from the Sun is constant, and space is virtually frictionless, then asteroids can spin faster and faster until they disintegrate."
Given that the number of asteroids is in the millions, that they have been around for millions of years, and that the effect is something that should have been going on for quite a while for, probably, a considerable portion of those asteroids, is the fact that this is the first observation of the effect an indication of lack of attention up to this point?
-
Friday 8th November 2013 11:47 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: First example?
No idea if it's a fault of the article... but some unequal force is needed for spin. So something would need to be set up just right for this one rock to spin from solar forces only. I'd put such a theory below "hit by another rock" and "off-gassing of ice under the surface (thus the sudden event and surface having no ice) on the plausibility scale. But then which one get's more funding/headlines/papers published? The plausible one, or the crackpot... ahem, less likely and more convoluted explanation?
-
Friday 8th November 2013 16:09 GMT NoiTall
Re: First example?
My vote is on 'hit by another rock'. It's hard to explain that the basically constant solar radiation across the rock's surface would impart rotation. But maybe that's just the journalist's lack of understanding that lead to the omission of that essential explanation. As it comes without the article is next to useless, other than bringing an odd object into the broader public news arena.
-
Friday 8th November 2013 16:46 GMT marioaieie
Re: First example?
Actually you explain with the assimetry of the asteroid, as it was hinted in the article...
"This YORP effect (named after the four scientists who contributed to the theory: Yarkovsky, O'Keefe, Radzievskii, and Paddack) has been suggested as a reason for the relative paucity of small, asymmetrical objects within our Solar System in comparison to rounder rocks, and the search is now on for more observations of the theory in action."
-
Friday 8th November 2013 16:56 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: First example?
Again, that's the theory, as yet without observation. Do uneven shapes rotate when solar radiation is applied? Or show that the sun "burns off the edges and makes them round" as the above quote seems to suggest.
Many other factors can play to why the rocks are round (structure, strength, gravity, impact) etc.
I'll not quote the astronomer, physicist and mathematician on a train gag. ;)
But I'm not suggesting it's wrong, just it's still very low in the plausibility until more observations are made. :)
-
-
-
Saturday 9th November 2013 06:43 GMT Lapun Mankimasta
Oh for pity's sakes Re: First example?
Everything in space spins to some degree. Angular momentum is universal. It's more a question of how much this asteroid's angular momentum differs from other asteroids'. And it's likely that the outgassing is the result of a thin layer of insulating rock being eroded off by flares and the like, than an impact.
-
Saturday 9th November 2013 12:21 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Oh for pity's sakes First example?
Lapun Mankimasta, the question is, how does the sun impart rotational momentum. I do not question that it exists for objects orbiting the sun. The question is, how is an energy gradient setup so that the rock gains momentum in it's rotation?
As for the wind/pin wheel. Yep, that's down to the shape. So, have they observed the shape of this rock to confirm it? It's the difference between claiming "rocks spin because of solar wind" and "rocks spin because of collisions with other rocks".
As said, it's no doubt a correct theory, but it needs observation to support it first.
-
-
-
-
-
Friday 8th November 2013 06:10 GMT JamesTQuirk
@ Captain DaFt
Yeah I saw that, but did/if you look on in further at Haumea's orbit, it may be a gravitational slingshot away from coming to inner solar system, this inter galactic pool is trickier than appears, it seems they might not need the probe, I seen "when worlds collide", so it must be true ...
-
-
Friday 8th November 2013 06:03 GMT BestofAndy
Spinning so much that the innards of the asteroid are coming out of the core through the several crater holes that it has, and giving a garden sprinkler like effect. The real question is: how can a massive crater get so much angular momentum that is spins wildly enough to have its innards spewing out? This does not make much sense. Perhaps its a aliens version of a Mexican fireworks, or pin wheel?
-
Friday 8th November 2013 09:22 GMT VinceH
"The current idea is that the asteroid is being spun around so quickly that it is breaking apart under the strain of its own rotation. The spin is probably the result of hundreds of thousands of years of slight pressure from solar emissions."
Not an alien space ship that's accidentally been struck as it passes through the belt and is now out of control, then?
-
Friday 8th November 2013 11:02 GMT Eastander
The Asteroid is Electrically Charged and Passing Through the Sun's Electric Field
The asteroid is approaching the sun and thus moving further into the sun's electric field (which accelerates the solar wind away from the sun). The asteroid has an electric charge and thus behaves like a comet - check this out : The Electric Comet at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34wtt2EUToo
-
Friday 8th November 2013 22:45 GMT Destroy All Monsters
Re: The Asteroid is Electrically Charged and Passing Through the Sun's Electric Field
JeanLucPicardFacepalm.jpg
Care to explain how the asteroid can keep its charge for any amount of time at all? Being immersed in solar wind which is rich in charged particles of all sort would then equalize its charge to pretty much exactly zero faster than the European Central Bank deciding on another half-percentage cut of the interbank interest rate.
-
-
Friday 8th November 2013 13:49 GMT Curly4
170 degrees K to hot for ice
"One idea was that we were seeing ice on the asteroid outgassing, but the object is too hot, around 170 Kelvin, for ice," he explained.
To hot for ice? I must admit that it has been a very long time since I studied this but at a -103.15 degree C does not seem to hot to me.
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
Friday 8th November 2013 16:27 GMT NoiTall
Re: 170 degrees K to hot for ice
Blame that semi-explanation, i.e. NO explanation, on the journalist who merely repeated the line without wondering what it meant. But, this might help: Space is mostly a very large volume that nearly everywhere has a truly dazzling vacuum, much emptier than anything we can create on Earth. That next-to-nothing pressure implies that (water-) ice would be sublimating (solid turning into vapor) at a very low temperature. However, the ice is likely maintained well above the equilibrium temperature for the local "vapor pressure" by the substrate \ rock it is attached to, which receives thermal radiation, may be radioactive itself, etc.
-
-
Friday 8th November 2013 15:19 GMT BinkyTheMagicPaperclip
Noooo! It's a Vorticon invasion!
Fools - Yorp is not a group of people, it's a small green single eyed Martian alien! Mostly harmless, but there are aggressive examples. Beware of other species such as the technically advanced and warmongering Vorticons!
Ring the US and get Billy Blaze on the line, we need Commander Keen to save us all!
(I think the Yorps disappeared after the first couple of releases of Commander Keen - perhaps they're stranded on that asteroid)
-
Friday 8th November 2013 15:30 GMT daviddmpb
Son of Comet
Perhaps a piece of a "comet" that orbits the sun near the asteroid belt. It's "weird" nature sounds like what I know about comets. Ice in space ... comets. Dark surface ... comets. Outgassing ... comets. Rotation ... every space object rotates and continues to rotate for a very long time since there is little "friction." Its brother asteroids are rotating.
-
Friday 8th November 2013 16:47 GMT Snowball Solar System
Gravitational Instability
Planetesimal Formation by Gravitational Instability:
The growing understanding of planetesimal formation is that it occurs by gravitational instability, explaining their spherical contours; however, excess angular momentum often causes them to fragment as they gravitationally collapse, forming gravitationally-bound binary comets, asteroids and trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs). And perturbed binaries may frequently spiral in to merge and form peanut-shaped 'contact binaries'.
An alternative hypothesis suggests that gravitationally-collapsing stars may form bar-mode instabilities which become isolated pairs of giant planets when the protostar collapses to form a core, abandoning its two 'bar-mode' arms. If the arms are gravitationally bound within their own Roche spheres, they may go on to gravitationally collapse to form proto-planets.
And giant proto-planets may go on to fragment (bifurcate) due to excess angular momentum, forming binary planets. Then the energy and angular momentum of their binary orbits cause them to spiral out from their progenitor stars until their binary components spiral in and merge, forming solitary planets.
Moons may similarly spin off from gravitationally-collapsing proto-planets during their own bar-mode instability phase, forming moons that bifurcate and spiral out from their progenitor planets. Saturn's moon Iapetus may be a contact binary without sufficient gravity to form a completely spherical surface, hence its contact-binary walnut-shape and the raised ridge around its equator.
-
Saturday 9th November 2013 09:54 GMT carl_
the rotation theory does not seem to fit what's show in the image. besides, why would the fact that it is rotating cause it to heat up over a hundred degrees more than its surroundings?
it's far more likely to be the result of residual heat from a collision. there could have been radioactive material in the asteroid that ignited in the collision.