So nice of our American friends to tell us about it.
Oz government knew about PRISM BEFORE Snowden leaks
In a hardly-surprising revelation, it's emerged that Australian government security agencies knew about PRISM before Edward Snowden went public with his leaks about the surveillance system. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation had requested access to a protected briefing to the Attorney General that was prepared in March. …
-
-
Tuesday 8th October 2013 22:50 GMT Chris G
Re: Friends take care of friends
Maybe the deal they have with the UK, Singapore and the States is older than reported;
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/australian-spies-in-global-deal-to-tap-undersea-cables-20130828-2sr58.html
Oz is in a good position to tap a lot of info. They probably got a free version of Prism to play with.
-
Wednesday 9th October 2013 06:16 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Friends take care of friends
Come on, get a life.
Most of us in the industry knew about Prism-related activities as well as which vendors built the specialized kit for the 3-letter agencies by 2007. It was a public secret by that time. The fact that spooks did not contract the vendors doing the work to build it using golden handcuffs on personnel implementing and supporting it did not help either. It leaked all over the place. The personnel left the companies in question to go to pastures new and spoke about it in pubs and bars. Sometimes on the other side of the globe.
If the aussies did not know it by 2007 and did not brief their government they should all be summarily fired for not doing their job. They just did their job in this instance.
-
-
-
Wednesday 9th October 2013 02:11 GMT david 12
Re: Why redact references to media reports?
Some elements of the report -- like the talking points prepared for use in Question Time -- are redacted because they are exempt, not for security reasons.
A part of the reason why sections that have only political content are exempt is because there is no competing public-interest reason to make them public.
They redact sections that have no content anyone would care about except for narrow political reasons. It's part of the trade off of FOI.
-
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
Tuesday 8th October 2013 23:27 GMT Levente Szileszky
Sorry but it seems every subsequent Australian governments were always...
...lapdogs of the US, let's just state the obvious. I did search for it but cannot seem to find any case in recent history where they have replied with anything other than "Of course we can, when do you need it? How about right now?" to a US request...
...and what's worse that Oz seems to be also pretty much the only country in the developed world that so frighteningly openly abandons its citizens if they don't line up politically, it's an absolute disgrace how they behave. Think of what you want about the man (I'm certainly ambivalent about his actions) but this disgusting, rotten Australian official behavior/policy should have become absolutely obvious by now to anyone who follows the Assange-story ie when that lowlife turtle ForMin and his ugly, cruel scumbag boss (Gillard) practically openly stated they will not help the man, regardless of his citizenship, even after their AG threatened him with treason (sic!), revoking his passport etc and all turned out to be false and baseless.
Ironically I cannot imagine the US similarly abandoning its citizens abroad, so openly especially if they are in such a mess and dire need for diplomatic and legal help - as long as they didn't break some major US laws, of course (eg acts like helping the enemy of the US etc, in which case they will be tried for treason, correctly.)
PS: to his credit Kevin Rudd defended Assange once, by stating the obvious ie that Manning leaked the documents and it's the error of the US security services.)
-
-
Wednesday 9th October 2013 01:44 GMT Yes Me
Re: So ... UKUSA agreement cracking?
Nah. Canada, Australia and NZ have been part of it since 1942 or thereabouts, even though it wasn't actually signed until 1946. No cracks worth mentioning, I don't think.
http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/declass/ukusa.shtml
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukusa/
-
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
Wednesday 9th October 2013 06:28 GMT Jerry
Everyone knew about it already - Binney
In December 2012, Russia Today talked to William Binney, whistleblower and former NSA crypto-mathematician who served in the agency for decades.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2013/06/07/Ignored-NSA-Whistleblower-Vindicated-Said-Months-Ago-Everyone-in-US-Under-Virtual-Surveillance
-
Wednesday 9th October 2013 11:19 GMT Barrie Shepherd
"Documents obtained by the ABC also reveal that the Attorney-General at the time, Mark Dreyfus, was advised that the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) does not have backdoor access to the National Broadband Network."
"I see pigs flying overhead - no wait - they don't need backdoor access if the NSA and China already have it.
Ground the pigs!