Contemplating getting the carton for the vanilla protein shake I had this morning out the bin and checking the ingredients now..
THE TRUTH about beaver arse milk in your cakes: There's nothing vanilla about vanilla
Sweden's food watchdog has confirmed to horrified netizens that, yes, ooze from beavers' back-passages is used to add a vanilla flavour to cakes, ice creams and drinks - and has been for years. A yellowish secretion called castoreum is extracted from the animals' scent-laying anal glands, and is sometimes mixed into perfumes …
-
-
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 11:37 GMT Peter Simpson 1
Re: Come on
I call BS.
There's no way catching beavers is easier or cheaper than growing vanilla plants. The number of beavers required to meet the world demand for natural vanilla flavor would be astronomical.
Sorry, but this has "urban legend" written all over it.
// Bull $#!#, not "beaver scent"
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 12:52 GMT tomban
Re: Come on
According to Wikipedia:
"While it is mainly used in both foods and beverages as part of a substitute vanilla flavour, it is less commonly used as a part of a raspberry or strawberry flavoring. The annual industry consumption is very low, around 300 pounds, whereas vanillin is over 2.6 million pounds annually"
Still, 300 pounds is an awful lot of beavers.
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 16:12 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Come on
> There's no way catching beavers is easier or cheaper than growing vanilla plants.
There is no way those who process dead beaver would not try to extract every last
scent they could from the dead animal. If this includes selling its dead arse juices as vanilla flavouring then that is exactly what they will do. -
Wednesday 18th September 2013 20:55 GMT shrdlu
Re: Come on
Vanilla beans will be cheaper than castoreum but still too expensive for most purposes. Commercially vanillin is made from wood pulp. It's a by-product of the paper-making industry. So you should only expect castoreum in very high-end organic foods and the most expensive perfumes. The most expensive perfumes also use musk collected from the scent-glands of musk-oxen and civet cats. You definitely won't find musk in a vanilla protein shake.
-
Thursday 19th September 2013 11:42 GMT AVee
Re: Come on
"I call BS."
Nope. A dutch TV program which tracks origins of consumer products to show how they are created dug into this earlier this year. And yeah, the stuff exists, is being collected from killed beavers and being sold as a natural flavor. Getting a food producer to admit they use it turned out to be a different story, but the stuff exists and is being sold.
The two episodes covering this are online here:
http://keuringsdienstvanwaarde.kro.nl/seizoenen/2013/afleveringen/14-03-2013
http://keuringsdienstvanwaarde.kro.nl/seizoenen/2013/afleveringen/21-03-2013
The program is in Dutch, but contains some stuff (the start of the second episode) which takes place in Canada which are in English (with dutch subs). It shows a Canadian trader with a shed full of dried anal glands...
-
-
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 20:53 GMT Anonymous Coward
Sampler: "Contemplating getting the carton for the vanilla protein shake I had this morning out the bin and checking the ingredients now.."
The vanilla's okay, but you don't want to know where they got the protein from.
Peter Simpson 1: "Bull $#!#, not "beaver scent""
No, no- they use bulls**t as *strawberry* flavouring.
Anyway, I don't see that this should be news to our Scandinavian friends- I once owned^w saw a Swedish video that was an hour of some guy doing nothing but eat beaver.
-
-
-
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 11:14 GMT Lamont Cranston
Re: Luwak coffee - a question
Kopi Luwak is delicious, assuming you like coffee but dislike it's bitterness (you could, of course, obtain the same effect for less money by buying your coffee at Starbucks).
My wife's a vegetarian, but didn't see anything wrong with Kopi Luwak (apart from the whole "you're drinking brewed poo").
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 17:21 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Luwak coffee - a question
> Just curious - are vegans allowed to have that or not?
You know, when I was reading the article, that was the first thing that came to my mind.
"Ordinary" vegetarians even might even quail at a product derived from a killed animal. Does the packaging of otherwise vegetable products make it clear that there is arse milk form a dead beaver in the product?
-
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 22:51 GMT Dave 126
Re: Luwak coffee - a question
Hehe, 'Poo' would be a suitable (if not commercially viable) name for a Twitter-like 'social media' service. My reasoning is that many animals use pee or poo to get messages out to their peers they are not currently in the presence of. If of you want to take this idea and turn it into a multi-billion dollar company, I only ask a 1% cut... I'll even throw in some tag-lines to get you started:
"Why say it when you can spray it?"
"Putting the Pee into people"
"Poople"
Of course, humans would want to expand the vocabulary of the medium beyond the three messages favoured by many mammals, ie "This is MINE!", "I'm feeling HORNY!" and "I have an interesting bowel condition". Or there again, that's enough to cover much of the human condition.
-
Thursday 19th September 2013 00:48 GMT sam bo
Re: Luwak coffee - a question
"Vegan - absolutely not. Out of the question, it is still sourced from an animal."
I would dispute that. It may have passed through an animals alimentary canal, but as the civet ate the bean-pulp and passed the bean, it could even be argued that it had not been "inside" the civet. Technically , your food is not "in" you until it has passed the lining of your gut and been absorbed into your bloodstream.
Think of your body as an elongated donut, with the outer layer the skin and the hole of the donut your digestive tract.
Wild Luwak coffee should be fine for vegans - caged civet luwak coffee should be ethically repugnant to all.
-
Thursday 19th September 2013 10:40 GMT No, I will not fix your computer
Re: Luwak coffee - a question
>>Vegan - absolutely not. Out of the question, it is still sourced from an animal.
The bean was never part of the animal, although you could claim that the labours of the animal are being exploited (commercially they are fed on the whole bean), but if that counts as animal product then so does any vegetable which has been farmed as you're using the labours of humans.
What if a bee fertilises your crop? are you exploiting the bee? does it cease to be vegan?
Any fertiliser that are used on fields actually go on to become part of the product (often blood/fish/bone sourced) or animal waste - thus making virtually no product vegan (under your definition).
What about water? that's probably been through many an animal in it's time.
So, when you say "absolutely not" - are you sure?
-
Friday 20th September 2013 00:38 GMT Trixr
Re: Luwak coffee - a question
Regarding the logic of what you say, it's obvious you're not a vegan - "absolutely not" is correct. Honey from bees is not permitted either by strict vegans.
Add to that the fact that the beasts are now mostly farmed to produce the "processed" beans - including feeding the coffee berries all the time, when it isn't their natural eating pattern - and it's double-fail.
I'm not a vegan, but at least I've spent some time understanding their principles rather than coming out with some half-baked "logic" out of my own arse. So to speak.
-
-
-
-
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 06:01 GMT Khaptain
Anal Ooze
Does this mean that at some point, someone caught a beaver, pulling various bits and pieces off , including the analy situated scent glands, squeezed them, waited for some ooze and actually though that it might be a good idea to eat.
And then decided it might be a good replacement for Vanilla.
-
-
-
-
-
Monday 23rd September 2013 08:16 GMT Fraserrr
Re: Many years ago I found my self in the Midlands town of Leicester outside a police station
Actually it's 'belvoir' and is indeed pronounced beaver! The area near where my parents live is know as the vale of belvoir, and is centred around belvoir castle - all pronounced beaver! Always makes me smile!! :)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 07:20 GMT Flocke Kroes
Daft labelling
My red food dye has "Artificial" and "Cochineal" in a big font on the label. I assume they put 'cochineal' on there to scare away anyone who knows what it is, and 'artificial' to scare away anyone who doesn't. If I had been a little less alert, I would have missed it because I was looking for something that did not contain E120.
-
-
-
Thursday 19th September 2013 12:43 GMT mhenriday
Re: Nominative determinism strikes again
«Sund is Swedish for sound (healthy), with a silent 'h' added to make it obvious (to a Swede at least) that it is a name.»
Fru Sundh's surname is a typical soldier name from the period when the royal government made groups of peasants responsible for supporting a soldier and his family while he was off to the (continual) wars. Either she or her husband has such a progenitor....
Henri
-
-
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
-
-
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 13:26 GMT Badvok
Re: This is nothing
"and yes I too want to know how they found Beaver botty had such an interesting taste"
If you read the article the clue is in there. Beavers use this as a scent to mark their territory, so it wouldn't take much for someone to wander past a scent marked tree and think "Hmm, that smells a bit like vanilla, I wonder where it came from." and then do a little investigation.
-
-
-
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 11:21 GMT Don Jefe
Re: But is it kosher ?
Kosher has as much to do with who and how the food is handled as it does with the 'cleanliness' of a food. A lot of things you wouldn't think would qualify do because the preparation and handling of the food is done in accordance with the rules.
Kosher is a carryover from a much more observant time in Jewish history. It is fairly easy to comply with so many people still observe the ritual (while ignoring tons of other observances) but a lot of practitioners have never really looked into what it means, operationally. Religious conotations not withstanding, Kosher is a great job creator and market generator.
-
-
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 13:59 GMT sisk
Re: But is it kosher ?
No, its not. In order for a meat or land-based animal sourced byproduct to be kosher it must first come from an animal that has cleft hooves and chews cud. So far as I know beavers possess neither trait. I know this because my own religion requires a diet close enough to kosher that when we're in a strange city we either look for kosher eateries or stick to fast food joints (because hamburgers are always safe for us as long as there's no bacon on them).
But honestly, unless you're a Jew, Muslim, or Adventist, who gives a beaver's behind?
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 14:43 GMT Don Jefe
Re: But is it kosher ?
Human hair, or at least the proteins extracted from it for use in food, is Kosher. I haven't met a Human who has a cloven hoof. I've met a few who I suspected did, but I tricked them into revealing their feet by having to remove their shoes to cross the stream into my
throne roomoffice.Kashrut law is far more complex than people think. Even most observant Jews don't know or understand all the rules involved.
http://www.kashrut.com/articles/L_cysteine/
-
-
Friday 20th September 2013 00:29 GMT Don Jefe
Re: "cross the stream into my throne room"
The story of tricking suspected demons into exposing their hairy legs is one of many traditional non-canonical stories about Solomon. In one version of his meetings with the Queen of Sheba, Solomon began to suspect her wealth and power stemmed from her being a witch/demon/djin/dybbuk who, as you all know, always have hairy legs when appearing as Human females.
Solomon had his throne moved to a place in his palace where the Queen would have to lift her skirts and he could see if she had hairy legs. She did, or didn't, have hairy legs depending on the story and he either banished her after taking her treasure and slaves, imprisoned her and made her work on The Temple with the other demons he had imprisoned to do the work, or impregnated her.
That same story is also directly tied to the traditions of Western Judeo-Christian women shaving their legs. Ha! Bet you didn't know that did you :)
I don't have a stream in my throne room. I just thought it would be fun to toss in references to an old Jewish story since we were discussing old Jewish traditions.
-
-
Thursday 19th September 2013 19:24 GMT sisk
Re: But is it kosher ?
Human hair, or at least the proteins extracted from it for use in food, is Kosher
Our restrictions are in some ways much simpler than Kashrut law, but they come from the a block of text about 3 paragraphs long that's in both the Torah and the Bible. I always assumed, because of that, that Kosher food had to conform to our restrictions as well. If what you say is true then I've been mistaken about that for a very long time. Nothing from the human body would be acceptable for us to eat.
-
Friday 20th September 2013 00:34 GMT Don Jefe
Re: But is it kosher ? @sisk
Kashrut law is only based on a few paragraphs as well. Over the millennia they've just taken the interpretation to extremes. There's a stereotype there about complex rules and ways around their own rules. It's kind of true in some respects :)
You should check out that Kashrut site I linked to above. It's a good introductory source to some of the rules. They aren't simple at all...
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 08:42 GMT Khaptain
Re: Clue's in the name, isn't it?
"Why a woman would want to smell like the rear-end of a giant rat is beyond me."
When you see that state of some of the women that have had "Aesthetic Surgery" , it is understandable. They already look like the rear-end of giant rats. The skin pulled back, the exploding cheeks, the pouting lips ....all that's missing is the smell.
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 10:23 GMT Richard IV
Re: Clue's in the name, isn't it?
Not to mention the perfumiers' favourite narwhal retchings and excrescence, or ambergris as it's also known.
Or the urea that's the basis for anti-wrinkle creams. Mmm, wee.
Bismarck had an awful lot of choice for his quote: "Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made"
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 12:49 GMT Don Jefe
Re: Clue's in the name, isn't it?
Urea is also the curing retarding agent in the ready to use animal based glues (hide glues) used in fine furniture and musical instruments. It is also preferable to use in powdered hide glues instead of water during the heating/mixing process; but that's rarely done anymore.
People just aren't as comfortable with that sort of thing these days. It really ruins the mystique of a cabinet makers or luthiers shop if you picture them pissing in a heated pot of animal proteins and smearing it all over their work :)
-
-
-
-
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 10:01 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: @Robin: financially viable ?
Ah but anything synthesized or chemical sounding is toxic evil: Vanillin, monosodium glutamate, disodium guanylate, disodium inosinate, sodium chloride, high fructose corn syrup... etc... all evil baby killing CHEMICALS.
Whereas juice of sun-dried beaver arse is "natural" and therefore wholesome: Natural vanilla flavour, soy sauce, Worcestershire sauce, urea, salt, honey, artemisia, henbane, ergot... etc... all yummy NATURAL foods.
All this crap (quite literally) is for marketing at morons.
-
-
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 11:15 GMT I ain't Spartacus
Re: Could be worse:
I always assumed that most calamari was made from cable insulation. Hence the phrase, that calamari Hong Kong style was rubbery...
Although I think tripe is worse. It's not the thought of where it comes from, so much as the amount of time it spends in your mouth being chewed, giving you longer to think about what you're eating. And that was disguised in a rather delicious Vietnamese ramen type dish. I'm not sure I fancy tripe and onions - one of my Grandad's favourites apparently.
What was that quote from Neal Stephenson's Zodiac? Something like:
I've lost a job and several girl friends by reading the ingredients from food packets aloud, with explanations.
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 15:48 GMT Don Jefe
Re: Could be worse:
The calamari thing is just a tiny part of a huge global problem with seafood. Even though it is highly illegal to mislabel food, the practice is rampant in the industry. Even hardcore seafood aficionados and celebrity seafood chefs are can't tell the difference within most categories.
Even in lab testing the general seafood process contaminates the samples with so many different genetic indicators from different animals it is nearly impossible to ascertain what you're eating unless you see someone lop the head off a live fish and cook it in front of you. Overall it's best not to worry over, it all tastes the same anyway :)
The particular piece you link to is based on a story by the show This American Life. The show, and that episode especially, is funny and worth a listen. The podcast is free at NPR.org.
-
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 11:38 GMT Dodgy Geezer
It's the 'cup and pea' game..
Here we have a story that stresses the fact that castoreum from beaver's glands is defined as 'safe for human consumption', probably grandfathered in based on its use many years ago, followed by scare stories about how it might be in all sorts of products under the heading 'natural ingredient'.
The story says "is used to make vanilla flavouring for cakes", but the only thing that was confirmed by the Swedish Food Authority was that it would be legal.
Given the shortage of commercial beaver breeding facilities of the size that would be needed to supply the human food-making industry, I suspect that all our cakes are actually vanilla-pod flavoured. But it's a good yucky scare...
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 13:06 GMT Don Jefe
Re: It's the 'cup and pea' game..
Don't know about the UK, but here in the US using something in food is pre-approved unless it has already been prohibited. You also don't have to disclose what is in the 'natural flavorings, aroma agents or colorings' unless it is a known allergen to a measurable subset of the population (nut products for example).
You don't even have to tell the FDA what's in there at all, unless they ask in the course of a formal investigation. Ingredients are considered a trade secret and may be kept confidential unless they fall under another regulation that requires their disclosure or people start smelling like beaver grundle.
Food and drug regulation and inspection doesn't work here the way most people think it does. I guess it goes to show how resilient Humans are to most things. Otherwise we'd all be dead many times over with the vegetarians falling first (ha!).
-
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 12:55 GMT Loyal Commenter
Vanillin
The principal compound in 'vanilla flavour', and the source of the vanilla flavour you're likely to find in el-cheapo ice cream, etc. is produced on an industrial scale from guiacol, which as far as I'm aware is extracted mostly from petrochemicals.
If you buy 'vanilla essence' from the supermarket, this will have been synthetically produced. If you use 'vanilla extract' on the other hand, this will have been produced from the seed pods of the vanilla orchid, usually by alcohol extraction. Neither of these products will have come from the anal scent glands of any animal, particularly not one that isn't farmed and is thinly spread in the wild, such as the beaver.
Incidentally, vanillin makes such an effective flavouring agent due to its detectability by the human nose at miniscule concentrations, as low as 0.00002%, so very little of it is needed.
-
Wednesday 18th September 2013 13:55 GMT Zot
But people don't care what goes into burgers and sausages.
This stuff, if true, comes from a gland, not it's turd chute.
Sausages contain said chute, the contents of the whole inside of an animal, and anything they jet wash off the bones.
Fry them up with a couple of chicken abortions and you've got yourself a lovely breakfast.
-
Thursday 19th September 2013 12:15 GMT mhenriday
Wel, Jasper, no one has ever considered the Reg a paragon of accuracy in reporting,
but I beg leave to correct the following statement : «Sweden's beaver population was wiped out by hunters about 200 years ago when the creatures' backside juice was used in medicines.» The native beaver (Castor fiber) in Sweden died out in 1871, but beavers from Norway were implanted in 1922 and the species now seems to be thriving here ; in 2000 the population was estimated to be some 100 000 animals....