Not really an app
It's just a poor excuse to gain traffic for their pr0n site.
They even list "El Reg" in their "As featured on" list.
Smut-for-Glass app suffers premature ejection
Google has barred the infamous Tits&Glass application from the app store for its “Glass” tech specs. The app's developer, MiKandi, says Google changed the terms and conditions for Glass developers, banning all adult content. Here's what the site has to say about the situation: “When we received our Glass and started …
-
-
-
Tuesday 4th June 2013 08:03 GMT jake
@Chairo (was:Re: As usual, the goo-tards don't ...)
Seems to me that the goo-tards are trying to avoid that construct in the popular media with the goo-glass thingie ... Unfortunately, it's bloody obvious that pervs will exploit the concept. Anyone who thinks otherwise have their heads buried firmly up their asses ...
As usual, I have no answers ... but my head isn't buried
up my assin the sand, either.-
Tuesday 4th June 2013 09:16 GMT Chairo
Re: @Jake (was:As usual, the goo-tards don't ...)
I am afraid the pervs will exploit pretty much any concept available. That's why they are pervs in the first place, anyway. Yes clearly Google glass has a far higher potential for misuse than other technology. On the other hand I am quite sure the society will somehow find ways to cope with it. If things get too much out of hand, there will most likely some kind of ban to wear them in the public. Google is anything but naive, so they will make quite some effort to avoid such a situation, I suppose.
-
Tuesday 4th June 2013 10:49 GMT James Hughes 1
Re: @Chairo (was:As usual, the goo-tards don't ...)
Glad to see Jake has admitted he has no answers. Perhaps he'll stop posting complaining whiney nonsense for a while as he tries to think of some? Although that doesn't seem to have worked for Eadon.
It's not surprising really - so many internet people have a opinion, but so few have alternatives to what they complain about.
And what is a 'goo-tard'?
-
-
-
-
Tuesday 4th June 2013 07:47 GMT Gordon Pryra
Seems like Google are burning their bridges here
Was it not the porn world who have progressed the internet by such a massive amount from the bad old days of animated gifs circa 80's-90's?
Considering the average buyer of the portable 24/7 pr0n display will be single 25-35 year old males with disposable income, it seems a bit silly to make them look at the alternative head set that will be out very soon after the glass.
-
Tuesday 4th June 2013 09:48 GMT Version 1.0
I vote for porn
Porn has been the single most inventive and creative force behind the Internet as we know it today - without porn you would not have streaming video or e-commerce ... at least not in the forms that we do today.
Porn my dears, is all in your head - given a choice between spending a weekend with a porn star and a weekend with David Cameron ... well, the porn star's got to be more interesting regardless of whether you keep your clothes on or not.
-
-
Tuesday 4th June 2013 11:03 GMT I ain't Spartacus
Re: a weekend with a porn star and a weekend with David Cameron
Eric Pickles, John Prescott and Ann Widdecombe in a love triangle. It's all your fault!
Edwina Currie, John Major and his big blue underpants. Well that mental image is her fault, and one I shan't forgive her for in a hurry.
Where's the mind bleach!
Just imagine what Louise Mensch would get up to with Google Glasses?!?!
The horror... The horror...
-
-
Wednesday 5th June 2013 21:49 GMT Trustme
"given a choice between spending a weekend with a porn star and a weekend with David Cameron"
To be fair you did massively weight the argument there in your favour (no Google Chrome it is NOT "favor"), if you'd said "given a choice between spending a weekend with a porn star and a weekend with your favourite rock band or favourite team", well I'd still have gone with the porn star to be fair.
-
-
This topic is closed for new posts.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
