ObJoke
I thought the missing link between monkey chatter and human speech was YouTube comments.
Scientists claim to have identified the missing link between human speech and monkey chatter. Researchers analysed the distinctive "lip-smacking" sounds made by wild gelada baboons of the Ethopian highlands and found striking similarities to human speech. Their noises are so human-like that Thore Bergman, an assistant …
This post has been deleted by its author
"Bergman said", but what he wanted to say, is that we first wanted to attach meanings and communicate in more sophisticated ways and then started to produce complex sounds. First we want to have a faster internet and then we start to produce one. I am starting to feel it would have been more fun with science than with computers.
Joke alert, if not anon. My bet would be that that started at the same time.
"He said: “The ability to produce complex sounds might have come first. Then, when we could do that, we could attach meanings and communicate in more sophisticated ways. Or it could be that, as we needed to communicate more, we developed an ability to produce a greater variety of sounds.”"
Or maybe God did created us by magic.
Just sayin'
"The Aquatic ape hypothesis of Elaine Morgan is much more likely.
Right or wrong it's a thought provoking read anyway.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elaine_Morgan_%28writer%29"
.
.
Here's a link to provoke a little more skeptical thought.
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4357
Brian Dunning FTW!
It might well have. But in terms of language, comprehension necessarily precedes production so we need to be examining what meaning if any is attached to these noises by these apes before we can claim to have made any great strides in plotting the evolution of speech.
This post has been deleted by its author
"It is not about language, but speech"
Fair enough.
They've found a monkey whose articulation is comparable with our own and that's certainly interesting and fun but doesn't add a great deal to the field as this articulation is not present in our closer primate relatives.
If Mr Hammill could actually lend some weight to one or other side of " “The ability to produce complex sounds might have come first. Then, when we could do that, we could attach meanings and communicate in more sophisticated ways. Or it could be that, as we needed to communicate more, we developed an ability to produce a greater variety of sounds.”" that would be more interesting.
This post has been deleted by its author
Also missing was the other article in the same publication: "A paradox in the evolution of primate vocal learning."
I only read the summary, but my understanding from elsewhere is that humans can't develop language if they aren't exposed to complex language. Its a bit of a chicken and egg situation. I think there's also a bit of a time limit to learn to speak "in the wild." 10 years IIRC.
I'm also a bit suspicious of the "evolution" tag. I'm not sure that Invoking The Holy Word That May Never Be Denied makes your research valid.
It's called alcohol, judging from the subhuman behavior seen in most town centres in the early hours of Saturday and Sunday mornings. Gets progressively louder and more agressive, only understandable by the similarly pissed up, and mostly done to impress females?
I appreciate that it's an insulting comparison, and I'd like to apologise in advance to any monkeys reading this.
Beer, for obvious reasons.
...this *startling news* that monkeys communicate with sound and to some it sometimes sounds like people talking in the distance is the *Missing Link*?
Really?
Many animals communicate with sound, i.e. whales and dolphins. This is hardly the Missing Link...
The "missing link" header is inaccurate, if only because the primates being described are contemporaries of humans - it's akin to a foolish creationist thinking that evolution means we evolved from gorillas (when, in fact, we share a relatively recent common ancestor).
However in terms of vocalisations humans appear to be far and above anything yet discovered or heard in primates, so the observations of this species of primate, and their apparently advanced communications could well serve as a contemporary "link" between ourselves and primates that has been "missing" from research so far.
I'd say the use of the term is sneaky, but the assumption from the reader is that the term is used in the well-worn context of evolution, to the exclusion of all others - a foolish assumption to make.
Or, since we're on the Reg, it could be someone having a bit of fun with daily mail-esque headline fibbery.
This post has been deleted by its author
The sinus cavity, throat and larynx construction are what make the sounds possible that humans use. The lips approach doesn't really deal with it. I give the man an "A" for effort though. Perhaps if they can find an example of any species that has changed it's chromosome count and lived on to create a variant species, they might have a case for apes becoming human, for instance apes have 48 and humans 46. That might go a LOT further in figuring out how these internal structures used in human vocalization changed so much.
This post has been deleted by its author
This post has been deleted by its author
This post has been deleted by its author
This Register article is badly titled and their use of the term 'missing link' is extremely misleading. 'Missing link' in evolutionary terms suggests some species that shares a common ancestor with humans and monkeys, of which there are already plenty.
The original research article that reports these findings does not use the term nor does it claim that these monkeys are ancestors of humans. It is merely describing a behaviour in these primates that may explain how human language evolved.
Working around lip smacking moneys all day ... now they hear human speech ... me thinks he needs to take a mental health day.
I remember being invited to a series of high level management meetings ... lot of lip smacking ... even thought I could make out a bit of intelligent, human grade, speech, from time to time ... I took a day off ... and never went back to those level of meetings again. Problem solved.
Sometimes when my dog barks he sounds like he is speaking. Looks like I’ve found the “missing link between humans and dogs”. So when should I expect my $20M check from the Gov.? In 1995 a budgerigar (talking bird) named Puck was credited by Guinness World Records as having the largest vocabulary of any bird, at 1,728 words. So does this mean we used to have feathers & “evolved” into what we are today. Or maybe we came about by means of a baboon, parrot, & dog ‘gett’in jiggy with it” ménage à trois style. This might explain how Obummer got elected…., and re-elected. Can I get my funding now?