Imation management having grown the annual loss by 800 per cent
Well done. Well done indeed. Bonuses all round?
<slow clap>
$310.2m: That's Imation's fourth 2012 calendar quarter loss. $299.1m: That's Imation's fourth quarter revenue. It takes some brass to record results like these and talk of the company's strategic transformation but that's what happens when you rightsize over-valued assets. The chart below shows the scale of the disaster. Third …
New one there.
Could he mean that it is now on primary (or even secondary) decline? Unlikely given that there is so little of the "traditional storage" market left - an accelerated decline would suggest that volumes were still high enough to provide a cliff to fall off.
Or does he mean that they ignored it for a long time hoping that something would come along and now they are having to face up to at least a decade's worth of decline in five minutes.
I recognise that management strategy - it's called the ostrich.
I looked it up and I still don't see any justification for using the term "secular decline".
I guess he meant "sector decline" but thought it sounded more inevitable (thus not his fault) as secular.
Dumb, meaningless, management-speak of that order suggests where the problem lies in much of industry.
Strictly speaking FiHart is spot on. This is not a secular decline - it is a long-term sector decline set during a period much of which was characterised by secular growth.
Secular refers to whole markets or economies - not tiny little subsectors.
Although it was clear what he meant it was a lazy and inaccurate usage of the phrase.