If you poke the sleeping dog long enough, you are going to be bitten.
Google whips out pocket cannon, fires VoIP patent sueball at BT
Google is suing BT in the US and the UK over allegations Blighty's national telco infringed four patents. The search giant typically leaves it to its Android phone-making pals, or its Motorola Mobility division, to drag rivals (read: Apple) into court over patents. But today, for the first time ever, it's seeking direct …
-
-
Friday 15th February 2013 10:31 GMT JaitcH
Re: It hasn't been called British Telecom since 1991
Post Office Telephones, with their little Post Office Morris series Z bashed out by Morris. The colour dated from their original wartime colours. If a technician was caught with Post Office tools in his house, he was liable to be charged with theft.
The labs were, long ago, a centre of technical excellence even the code-breaking Colossus computer, used at Bletchley Park during WW2, was built at the Post Office Research Station in Dollis Hill by a team led by the late Tommy Flowers.
ERNIE (Electronic Random Number Indicator Equipment) was built there for the government's Premium Bond lottery, Dollis Hill conceived Viewdata and the Prestel service (launched 1979) and Dollis Hill even has a war time cabinet bunker under it!
Sadly, it no longer enjoys it's former status.
-
-
-
-
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
-
-
-
Thursday 14th February 2013 16:08 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: BT
Really? Let me see.... Google, webmail, websearch, android are all well and good. Pity the poor sods who use spamwords etc. Most products from G have competitors from MS which are just as good, if not better, and definitely not so creepy.
As for BT. Products? You are kidding, right? Let me see DECT phones aren't too bad. As for IPClear, consumer broadband etc dream on!
-
-
-
Thursday 14th February 2013 16:44 GMT despairing citizen
Patently Obvious
The US rubber stamp office (sorry Patent Office) strikes again.
What part of these so called patents are not blindling obvious to a practioner in the field, and therefore fail the requirement to be inventive
Patents are suppose to be about protecting inventions, the only creative I see going on is in the patent application and approval process for big corp, et al.