
A Lexus copy but without the class.
If you’ve got a little over 40 grand lying about and fancy a four-door hybrid sports saloon then Infiniti - the posh bit of Nissan in a relationship similar to that between Lexus and Toyota - would have you know that the latest M35h is not only the fastest, but also the cheapest car of its type. Tempting words. After all who …
I refer you to the opening of the article.
>If you’ve got a little over 40 grand lying about and fancy a four-door hybrid sport
Actually yes I do and no I don't which is why I drive a Skoda. I've never seen the point in wasting money on something which takes you, and from time to time various other bits and pieces, from one place to another and for most of the time just sits around doing nothing.
A couple of links for you fro
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/best-cars/14932/top-100
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/best-cars/14928/best-manufacturers
So even if a Skoda were to masquerade as an Audi, or VW it would probably still be a better buy than many other makes.
"Actually yes I do and no I don't which is why I drive a Skoda. I've never seen the point in wasting money on something which takes you, and from time to time various other bits and pieces, from one place to another and for most of the time just sits around doing nothing."
If you're a 'gets you from A to B' kind of guy and not arsed about what you drive then why bother reading (and commenting on) a car review...?
The technology interests me, this is after all primarily a technology themed site, the car is secondary. I also love tinkering about with engines although nowadays I'd be hard pushed to change a spark plug. Neveretheless, I still drive about with a full toolbox (oo-er, no missuss, sit down) in the event anything should fail, just call it blind optimism.
Now then, smartarse, does that answer your question satisfactorily.
I'm driving the Nissan Altima (same shape, but not the shiny buttons, wood and cow inside).
For a 6ft6 guy, this car is awfully roomy. When compared to other cars in this segment, the Altima is my fave. Cow and heated seats can be fitted after-market, even through your dealer.
Unfortunately in the US, the latest altima (2013 model) has been slightly redesigned, taking away some of the headroom when sitting in the back.
I did drive an earlier model altima hybrid - but wasn't impressed. Hybridness would only work once the car was warmed up enough, and then only when driving downhill both ways below 30mph.
I will check this one out - I'm guessing that one of these will hit the price point of a well-equipped altima...
if i'm spending 40k on a car, i'd rather spend the extra 5k and get a beamer.
but in fact, i'd rather get the car 3 years later after it's depreciated a bit, and then i guess the cost difference between the two will be greater as i imagine the Infiniti will depreciate much faster than the beamer will.
"if i'm spending 40k on a car, i'd rather spend the extra 5k and get a beamer."
First, If you are spending 40k on a car then you cannot buy the BMW it's costs more you see. Second no-one asked your personal preference especially as you have no reasoning to back it up. Remember this is a tech site not a group of 12 year-olds discussing what they will do when they 'are grown up'.
First, If you are spending 40k on a car then you cannot buy the BMW it's costs more you see.
First, if I'm splashing 40k on a brand new car, then I almost certainly have enough cash around to be able to stretch it to 45k. If 40k is all I've got to spare in the bank, then I'm not spending all of it on a new car. At the most, I'd buy a second hand car for much less to leave a few k in the bank for emergencies like the central heating packing up in the middle of Snow Week.
"what do you do when bits stop working in 4-6 years?"
Fix them to make the car last for ten, then flog it to a mug because you don't want to be driving a ten year old car.
Most car safety systems that involve pyrotechnics (air bags, belt pre-tensioners) are only rated for ten years service (and would you want your life to depend on a firework that had been stored for over a decade?). But there's little chance of it being economically viable to refit these on a car of such an age. That's the price of better secondary safety, although the DfT haven't really cottoned on. When they do (particularly DfT) expect the MoT test to require replacement of safety related systems "when the makers recommend" with the obvious consequence.
if you want class!
They are known to be working on a number of hybrid options - the XF 3.0S (oil burner) can already average 45+ mpg even with a heavy right foot (according to a friend that has use of one).
Paris - 'cos she would rather get in a Jag than a Nissan, sorry Infinti...
"now do I get a Discovery TD5 or Jaguar XF?"
Mmm. Difficult. "Go anywhere when not being repaired in the garage" versus "Sit in opulence even when broken down". I think that makes the Jag the best bet.
And even that "go anywhere" claim is a bit bollocks, to judge by the Rangey slip sliding along where my ageing X Trail cruised through the snow. Admittedly that's because he was still wearing the silly factory slicks that are supplied on top end Range Rovers.
Would be great to see the fuel economy using that tech on a small car with a sensible engine power. Call me grandad, but I can't see the point of 300+HP when you only ever use less than the first 100. And why does one need a car that does 155MPH - which is 55MPH more than an instant ban.
"And why does one need a car that does 155MPH - which is 55MPH more than an instant ban."
Simple, because this car is aimed at more than just the British market, and will also be targeted at the Autobahn lot.
Plus if it "only" did the UK limit (+20-30) then it'd be open to accusations that it's slower than a Kia Picanto, which is a no-no for the people that would buy this kind of car!
Because at 65mph it's still got massive acceleration to get you out of trouble or safely overtake and isn't thrashing the engine to death to do it resulting in a quiet reliable machine unlike a noddy shopping trolley. It's potential terminal velocity is more an indication of other benefits.
> Plus if it "only" did the UK limit (+20-30) then it'd be open to accusations that it's slower than a Kia Picanto, which is a no-no for the people that would buy this kind of car!
OIC; having a powerful car like this means that you can overtake the Kia Picanto in the queue in front? Does it fly, or is it driven by Dave the salesman for whom queuing is optional...?
For someone who drives in the south of England countryside, there's sod all space to overtake on our crowded roads. And then get snarled up on the M25.
>OIC; having a powerful car like this means that you can overtake the Kia Picanto in the queue in front?
Yes, it does. You need a much shorter clear stretch of road to get past moving obstructions like this, and you can often safely get past 2 or 3 vehicles at a time. The ability to get from 40mph to 60mph+ quickly, smoothly and well under control is the big selling point for these sports tourers. As they say: been there, done that, got the T shirt.
> the point of 300+HP .... 155mph
Because only a few of us have the massively impressive man-parts to be allowed to drive a Smart, or a 1.2L Citroen AX diesel. Those of you with more inadequate bits are forced to buy these mechanical supplements
Of course real super-men ride a bike - I've got 21gears and wear lycra in public ;-)
> And why does one need a car that does 155MPH
Because it's nowhere near it's limits at 70, unlike something that tops out at 90.
It's has brakes and tyres that can stop it from 155mph.
It doesn't get completely foxed by a corner that tightens unexpectedly and spit you off into a field, because it was designed to corner at twice the speed..
You don't need the length of the M1 to wind it up and can actually overtake things on a single-carriageway road. Would you rather spend 20 seconds on the wrong side overtaking an artic or 2 minutes?
Just because you can doesn't mean you have to.
You got 33.6 mpg, i have a Jeep Grand Cherokee - probably the same cost-ish, its a V8, does 26 mpg, will go up the side of a mountain, drives on snow like its a dry tarmac road - why the fcuk would i buy that Datsun
??? or anything else that is not 4x4, i can never figure out why people have normal cars. In fairness I live on a farm, and i actually do use it off road.
(Ok, ignoring the fact the Jeep has the worlds worse interior - which is admittedly bullet proof but feels stupidly cheap, and dont mention the fact it produces a *bit* more Co2 than the Datsun, but probably less than my boat did.)
Smug owner of a Mercedes E-Class 4Matic (<- good all wheel drive) with hugely expensive Nokian (<- Finland) Hakkapasomethingorother snow tires that are also STUDDED (<- !!!). Full throttle starts on a greasy winter road typically results in seat-bending acceleration. It's a laugh a minute, leaves Jeeps in the slush, and makes winter driving an absolute hoot - at least up to 12-inches of snow where it begins to bog down a bit.
It's a highly recommended approach*.
(* Exact brand of AWD car entirely optional; as long as it has a large engine.)
This post has been deleted by its author
Alun, have to prod you a bit about the transmission. You say CVT has no place for a sporty vehicle but you have no objections to a 7-speed 'box, which regularly hunt between ratios to provide the optimum performance/economy/etc - something a half-baked rubber band setup does far better and gives better results.
Minor gripe aside, ta for the review. Ignore the clueless badge snobs, Infiniti are not a bad choice in the upper medium saloon sector. And while it is far from beatiful at least the Infiniti doesn't begin to hit the bottom of the ugly barrel that Audi and BMW regularly scrape. Over the last few years, only one thing more astonishing than the eye wateringly bad styling work from Ingolstadt and Munich years is the number of people who actually fall for the smug marketing bollocks and buy such horrendous stuff.
Beer as you need to have your grog goggles on big style to think they look remotely decent.
The thing about sporty cars, is that you want to have a degree of control.
I like manual boxes because I can blip it into second and drop-kick the car past some numpty doing 40 on an NSL road, bap-bap-bapping off the limiter as I pass (Yes, I'm a fucking child).
A decent auto will let you manually select - and hold - gears, giving you the control to do this when you want, but giving you syrupy smooth changes when you just want to get to, and back from, Tescos after a long day.
A CVT gives you neither of those control options to any degree that could be considered fun or sporting, hence has no place in a sporty car. That said, give it another ten-fifteen years, and that might change. People (not me...) are willing to accept the laughable concept that a turbo diesel with a 2000rpm powerband can be considered sporty these days, the nimrods.
No, I dont care about your torque.
I'll stick with my 40 litres of Super Unleaded, 6000rpm of usable power, and pops and farts on the overrun, thanks.
Steven R,
Ford Puma Millenium,
North York Moors
(Not my car, but same sort of noise... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3B9450NnnJQ )
When it comes to build quality the Japs have nailed it. For the models that are built on their island at least.
Admittedly, their stylistic approach ranges from silly to disgusting at times, but please do show me some 20+ yo german metal that runs as smooth as the tin boxes of their their ex-allies.
Beer, cause there's always an excuse for one.
I'm running a Japanese made X Trail and a Sunderland made Qashquai. Assemby quality of both was excellent (if anything the boys from Sunderland did a better job), but both have been subject to problems caused by poor quality parts from third party suppliers. So (all under warranty) the X Trail had an intercooler and turbo fail, the Qashquai has had new shock absobers, new track rod end, new front discs, and a new fuel pump & sender.
And when you do have to fork out for parts yourself, Nissan are a complete rip off - double or triple the equivalent parts price from Ford.
Looks like an outdated hyundai Lantra. which ever way you look at it. 41 mpg no thanks my beemer diesel does more than that on a bad day and is quick enough for me at 7secs 0-62.
This is back to american cars coming over here. Someone will buy it to be different then at trade in wonder why its only worth 300 quid. this thing will depreciate faster than a five yr old mondeo
And the interior looks decidely yuck and typical; nissan/ renault. with lots of buttons and sticky out bits.
"my beemer diesel does more than that on a bad day (41mpg) and is quick enough for me at 7secs 0-62."
"And the interior looks decidely yuck and typical; nissan/ renault. with lots of buttons and sticky out bits."
'Giving up finally, the fox looked up in contempt and said as he walked away, "Those grapes surely must be sour. I wouldn't eat them even if they were served to me on a golden dish."
My Infiniti is 8 years old. Only new tires, rear disk brakes, cam sensors replaced. All for about a thousand dollars in 8 years.. The G35 is one of the best handling 4 door sedans on the road today. Goes into a freeway transition at 70mph without braking, can accelerate 1/3 of way into the curve and will come out of it somewhere between 75 and 80. Too busy looking in the rear view mirror for the highway patrol to say exactly.