
50km if they were printed out...
What is this '50km', can we have standard Reg units please?
Anyone who wants to investigate just how London 2012 ticket sales were set up and run (or other mysteries of the recent Olympic and Paralympic Games) will have their chance: Blighty's National Archives has agreed to house and publish all the digital records arising from the Games. Unfortunately, in many cases outsiders will have …
@Boldman
What about all those empty seats, caused by the pigsnouters reserving so many good seats for corporate boondoggles and VIP packages that there were not enough for ordinary punters. The VIPs and boondogglers could not be bothered to show up, so the stadiums were half-empty.
And don't forget the hotel chains that donated cheap hotel nights to Locog, only to find them re-sold to the VIP package sellers.
From what I saw on the times I was at the Olympics most of the seats not filled weren't the businesses (they gave most to their customers as it was an amazing publicity thing) but the OBS and media partners. And of course noone wanted to see anything but the biggest teams and events.
Not to mention that with a lot of the foreign visitors at games once their team had played they buggered off!
I was at a double women's basketball game and after Australia had played several hundred people just left.
It's not as simple as some people think it is.
But plenty of time for a decent hacker to get them online.
(18 months to 2 years tops.)
((Less than 6 weeks if they actually get put on whatever servers they are going to be put on straight away.))
Timelineprobabilities:
3 years (first row of retirees) to get the data handed over.
2 years to find out some are missing.
1 year to second branch of retirements and find missing links.
6 weeks to get some of them out of the gaol.
2 years to plod along finding (and losing and getting more hacked) yet more unhanded over data.
6 years before the next scandal.
How many's that?
Another year to decide to open the databanks early.
46 weeks bickering over that in Parliament.
1 y...Ah... never mind, we weren't expecting any better.
No icon in protest at having no grinning, smarmy, Thatcher icon.
"I'd bet there's another 3 in there somewhere."
Well, at least two, if we trust the Grauniad:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/datablog/2012/jul/26/london-2012-olympics-money
However, with all the miserablists in this thread moaning on about how much was spent, why not think about how much the Olympics has improved this country's international reputation? Previously our reputation has been for *not* delivering big projects, for riots, and dodgy journalists.
There's also some very important things to consider, like we did this for half the cost of the Beijing Olympics (despite their full state control and slave labour wages). We look likely not to have the legacy of white elephant assets that Athens had. We've made some real infrastructure improvements to a part of London that was previously a semi-derelict s***hole. And we stand a modest chance of raising the profile of and engagement in sport in this country. Now, what's £11 billion between friends? That's about the same as we now spend on foreign aid each year, literally giving money away. Or twice the cost of cancelled Nimrod programmes (MRA4 and AEW3).
And finally, moaning at this point in time is merely to sitteth in scorner's chairs. When Red Ken "won" the Olympics, were on the hook for several billion, with no prospect of wriggling out of it. I wasn't happy then, but that is water (or cash) under the bridge.
Why not celebrate the positives?
> However, with all the miserablists in this thread moaning on about how much was spent, why not think about how much the Olympics has improved this country's international reputation?
That's one hell of a marketing budget you have there.
Is that the best you can say about the Olympics that the world thinks nicely of the UK now?
Sorry, but that's not a particularly persuasive argument for justifying that (by any stretch of the imagination) truly enormous sum of money.
that the maximum time for prosecution / investigation is 14 years, 9 months, 30 days and about 23 hours. Obviously ;)
that said, those power that be can access the records at any time and it is my infallible conviction they're just itching to bring those responsible to justice.
15 years - wtf? I can understand for military operations, etc, but the Olympic Games? Come on. They're taking the biscuit with this one, or might revealing the information be dangerous to law and order. My arse.
I wonder if FoI requests can get this info.
Bloody farcical that it can't be scrutinised.
Cold shower coming up.
does this have anything to do with the security fiasco and getting soldiers in to do the job properly?
Bringing in soldiers means that they would not have been doing their day job somewhere else, like in Afghanistan. I wonder how interested the Talibannies would be to read that sort of information...
So, there seemed to be the plan always of having the warship in the Thames, and the missile launchers on roofs. Then not long before the actual event G4S own up to apparently having failed to employ enough staff - maybe they had, or were told not to, as the government wanted/needed the military and police there instead in case of problems (protesting, rioting, terrorism) and paid off G4S to be the cover-up and scape goat. Maybe the police/military security was planned all along, or maybe was a last minute reaction to new intel on a potential threat - we'll find out in 15 years.