back to article Android Firefox: Screaming, awesome, you'll go blind etc

Mozilla has galloped a new version of Firefox for Android out of the gates just ahead of the expected full launch of Chrome on mobes later this week. The open-source firm has had a version of its popular browser on little green phones since 2010, but it hasn't lit many Google-mobe-lovers' fires so far. Chrome has been …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. Him over there

    No Chrome on Android?

    I'm not sure if I'm hip enough to use something with an "Awesome Bar", so I'll stick to my current Android browser, which is suspiciously entitled Chrome Beta, made by some dodgy outfit called Google Inc...

    1. dotdavid
      FAIL

      Re: No Chrome on Android?

      Pretty epic El Reg fail there, I'd agree.

      Although some might claim that because it is limited to the two or three ICS-running handsets you may well claim it doesn't exist ;-)

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: No Chrome on Android?

        I think the world+dog knew that the author was talking about the fact that Chrome is still technically in beta on Android.

        1. dotdavid

          Re: No Chrome on Android?

          "I think the world+dog knew that the author was talking about the fact that Chrome is still technically in beta on Android."

          By that logic, because Gmail was in beta for donkeys' years it didn't exist until relatively recently. Or am I missing your point?

    2. P Saunders
      Gimp

      Re: No Chrome on Android?

      Any word on Chrome and Firefox for Symbian? No? Oh, OK.

      1. HMB

        Re: No Chrome on Android?

        "Any word on Chrome and Firefox for Symbian? No? Oh, OK."

        It's dead Jim. :P

        1. Ron Christian

          Re: No Chrome on Android?

          Long live Caligula... ur, I mean, Windows 7.

    3. Ilgaz

      Yes, no chrome

      It doesn't run on 80% of Android market: it doesn't exist.

      Do you hear them now?

    4. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: No Chrome on Android?

      The Firefox14 new user interface is not nearly as useful on a 7" tablet running ICS as the preceding release user interface. It may look prettier but in fact it's ruined usage for me, on a 1.2GHz ARM, dual-core MALI-GPU tablet.

      On a tablet the new tab control has been reduced in size, and the tabs have got hard to use close points, compared with the previous user interface that had screen-extensions in the form of slide panels to the left and right of the screen for the tabs and bookmarks etc. which were a good size and excellent to use on a capacitive screen.

      The new controls stacked in the top-bar are not as finger friendly on a tablet, although they may be the right size for a phone.

      I also doubt that Firefox14 is as good as the stock ICS browser on a tablet. Empirical evidence of trying Facebook video in the stock browser is superb - I used the Intelligence-Squared - Google-Versus debate "Hip-Hop on trial", chaired by Newsnight's Emily Maitlis, so broadcast TV is a familiar standard for judging the quality. Same video in Firefox14 is not quite as good.

      1. Ilgaz

        Where is the patch? :)

        Send/ file or participate (if existing) in a bug report voting/ testing of the issues you mention. No arm assembly knowledge needed.

        Their gigantic size may fool you but Mozilla Firefox is a pure open source project. A lot of stuff you see in application are results from end user, noob, enterprise, mit professor alike feedback.

  2. mikeyboosh
    Thumb Down

    I installed it last night, it crashed twice, and used 11% of my battery in about an hour even though I gave up using it after it crashed. Needless to say I uninstalled it.

    1. Anonymous Coward 101
      Unhappy

      I find it crashy as well, which is a shame as it is otherwise very good when it works. How long can Google take to create a stable browser for their own operating system?

      1. Deebster

        @AC 101

        Are you talking about Firefox or Chrome?

  3. Gavin McMenemy

    I've not used Chrome, stock android or Firefox on my phone since I started using Dolphin. It's great and I recommend it.

    1. Neil Charles

      Dolphin's great

      And I use it on my phone, but my Android tablet's had Firefox on it for a while. Only one reason: it's got adblock. Early Android Firefox was rubbish, but the latest versions have been pretty good and adblock tipped the balance.

      Have to see what this new one's like, but fingers crossed. I do hate them ads.

      1. Dave's Jubblies
        Facepalm

        Re: Dolphin's great

        --------

        And I use it on my phone, but my Android tablet's had Firefox on it for a while. Only one reason: it's got adblock. Early Android Firefox was rubbish, but the latest versions have been pretty good and adblock tipped the balance.

        Have to see what this new one's like, but fingers crossed. I do hate them ads.

        -------

        Oh the wonderful irony of someone using adblock on an android device...

        I presume you understand why/how it's free?

        1. Neil Charles

          Re: Dolphin's great

          Yes, I know exactly how it's financed.

          The way I look at it is that the only way I've ever clicked a mobile ad is by accident, so adblock stops Google billing advertisers for clicks that are worthless.

          The other way I look at it is Android is what there is (unless I buy an iPhone, which I won't). I'd pay to remove ads, but i can't do that so I'll block them until there's an alternative.

          The other way I look at it is I don't give a sh*t how it's financed and am completely happy with free-riding off people who haven't worked out how to use adblock yet. Call it a stupidity tax.

          1. Wile E. Veteran
            Big Brother

            Re: Dolphin's great? -Ever read the license?

            I installed Dolphin once. When I tried to use it, though, I was presented with a dialog informing me that in using it I was agreeing to run a "background" task which would do behavioral tracking ala' Phorm.

            Don't know if it's still that way but I quit immediately and uninstalled it. Fu** the trackers!

            1. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: "Fu** the trackers!"

              Hmm, let me see.

              OS made by a company whose main source of revenue is user data - check

              Browser made by a company whose main interest lies in your browsing habits - check

              Platform which doesn't work unless you agree to the Google we-will-spy-on-you-but-it's-OK-because-we-use-a-computer-for-it Terms & Conditions by requiring a Google account - check.

              Public statements made by said company after the Streetview debacle that they didn't need the WiFi snooping anymore as that was now done by Android - check

              Not much fu**ing going on from your side - you've been very cooperative so far..

              1. Wile E. Veteran
                Devil

                Re: "Fu** the trackers!"

                Statement was generic, not an implication the built-in doesn't do tracking.

                I dropped my Android phone for a "feature" phone. Only use the old Android as a FLAC audio player and pocketable ebook reader. via DeaDBeeF and FBReader. (both open-source so no tracking.

                Phone turned off? Check.

                WiFi turned off? Check.

                Keep music & books on SD card? Check

                Copy music & epub files from BSD system via SD card? Check.

                Do ALL my email & web browsing from a BSD system? Check

                Not terribly cooperative I would say.

                1. Anonymous Coward
                  Anonymous Coward

                  Re: "Fu** the trackers!"

                  You remind of me when Richard Stallman claimed he reads all his webpages via wget. Inconveniencing yourself to the n-th degree isn't impressive, it just suggests you pay hundreds of £ for devices for which most of the features go unused.

                  (You were looking for a kindle btw. You can thanks me later.)

        2. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Dolphin's great

          "I presume you understand why/how it's free?"

          Well, gosh: Best I start inconveniencing myself right away! I'm sure they'd do the same for me!

          I'm an Android user. By definition that makes me neither a MS or Apple user, which means my default position is not bent over the desk begging to be buggered raw by the dictates and whims of multi-million dollar businesses.

          1. Sean Timarco Baggaley
            WTF?

            Re: Dolphin's great

            "I'm an Android user. By definition that makes me neither a MS or Apple user, which means my default position is not bent over the desk begging to be buggered raw by the dictates and whims of multi-million dollar businesses."

            Waiter? I'll have whatever he's drinking! Whatever it is, it clearly dulls the mind, the wits, and divorces you entirely from reality.

            (And facts. Like Google being a multi-BILLION dollar business.)

    2. Ian Johnston Silver badge
      Thumb Down

      I thought Dolphin on my phone was the worst browser I'd used until I tried Dolphin on a tablet, Ugly, clunky, awkward. Just horrible.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Errm, you know that there are only 3 true alternative browsers on Android that actually aren't just lame skins on the the default browser (like Dolphin, and ICS+ are).

      I find it hilarious when people claim that Dolphin and ICS+ are faster than stock, considering they USE stock. The only true browsers on Android that use their own rendering and javascript engines.

      Opera Mobile

      Firefox

      Chrome (Beta)

      1. Joe Drunk

        AC @10:23 GMT

        You are correct sir there are only 4 browsers available for Android - stock, Firefox, Opera and Chrome beta. The rest are just fancy shells that use stock webkit to render pages.

        It's like saying you don't use IE you use Maxthon.

        I hated Android Firefox 10, 11, relcutantly installed 12 and skipped 13 altogether. This is a vast improvement especially in the area of speed. I haven't tried the flash support but it does crash frequently on my stock android 2.2 device.

        Crossing fingers for version 15.

  4. DM2012

    If you're lucky enough to have an Icecream Sandwich mobile, ICS Browser+ beats Chrome and even Dolphin hands down.

  5. Anonymous Cowherder
    Thumb Up

    Chrome beta for me

    I used dolphin on my old desire but have been Chrome beta all the way on my One X, really good browsing experience with some very nice features.

  6. JDX Gold badge

    Are they going to replace the default Android browser with Chrome, i.e. make Chrome the built-in browser?

    1. Rob Thorley

      Chrome BETA

      It displays passwords in the clear above the keyboard - but masks them onscreen.

      Needs updating

      1. Irongut

        Re: Chrome BETA

        Actually that's a good thing. Typing a long & complicated password is a pain in the ass on a mobile and the little stars that mask it make it even worse. At the end of the day who is actually going to see my password on my mobile? I'd pay for a mobile browser that removed the mask from all password text boxes.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Chrome BETA

          I think there may be an App for that. It also ships off your password, but hey, if you start with a Google provided platform you're on the privacy and data losing side already anyway..

  7. FartingHippo
    Trollface

    Hello? Anyone there?

    Where are you, Opera fans? Sleep in today?

    1. Lee Dowling

      Re: Hello? Anyone there?

      We just don't read stories concerning Firefox unless there's some sort of gross comparison.

      Other browsers playing "catchup" (apparently not very well) isn't news to us.

      1. HMB
        Flame

        Re: Hello? Anyone there?

        "......Other browsers playing "catchup" (apparently not very well) isn't news to us."

        IE 7 is the latest browser to try and catch up with Opera on market share (in UK anyway). Every day it gets a bit closer to Opera's market share :P

        I bet Microsoft are really proud their old browser is approaching the popularity of Opera.

        Says big things when that many people like what you're doing.

        1. Trevor Marron
          FAIL

          Re: Hello? Anyone there?

          I assumed he meant catch-up on features, speed etc, no numbers of users.

    2. Ian Yates

      Re: Hello? Anyone there?

      What's that? Oh, sorry. Yep, I use Opera Mobile on my Sensation, but I've found the vanilla Browser is better on my Transformer.

      I'll just go and do some flagellation to cleanse myself.

      1. Nosbod

        Re: Hello? Anyone there?

        Try Firefox Aurora http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/mobile/aurora/ on your Transformer its not bad.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Hello? Anyone there?

      Sorry, too busy not getting angry about our web browsers.

    4. Andy80

      Re: Hello? Anyone there?

      Opera user here. Prefer it over the rest. Prefer the layout and the tabs in Opera, works very well.

    5. Ilgaz

      Re: Hello? Anyone there?

      Opera fans/ users have nothing against Mozilla/ Firefox.

      I even wrote why Firefox in this shape is very big news for Android scene below using opera mobile and got voted down :)

  8. ThePlanMan
    FAIL

    idd reg fail. Been using Chrome on my Note since ICS was released for it.

  9. ukgnome
    Facepalm

    Chrome is only suitable for arm7 phones and above

    When most handsets are on 1.6 to 2.3 I wonder what the point of all this variety is.

    I suspect that failfox is only suitable for arm7 (just checked - thought so)

  10. mrunix
    Coat

    there is chrome.....

    On android.... albeit without flash support.......

  11. 27escape
    FAIL

    Not widely available

    not available for my ICS tablet or ICS phone.

  12. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Horribly-written article

    Maybe some links to the mobile Firefox? Discussion of the different strains (been running the "Aurora" branch on my Android 4.xx device for a while, for example.

    I am not sure what the bone fides of the author are, but she/he/it seems to have phoned this one in from the pub, it's generally light on detail all-round.

    (Also, where are the Opera bores in the comments? Come on, chaps, someone mentioned a browser)

  13. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Seems really sluggish here.

    About half the speed of the Android 4.0.4 browser here on my Xperia Arc S and Asus Transformer, it's about 1/3rd the speed of Opera Mobile and used 3x the storage space.

    You really have to question how Mozilla come up with these totally bogus claims.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Seems really sluggish here.

      Hmm, seems about the same speed as the default browser for me, running the latest Aurora build.. but that said, my Galaxy S3 is a ludicrously overspecced quad core beast, so it damn well should be able to run a web browser..

  14. Paul Shirley

    no smart zoom or text reflow - Epic Fail

    Another Android FF release that absolutely refuses to honour my zoom level between pages, is completely incapable of any sort of smart zoom, page fit or even text reflow. And it's been like that in every release so far - they're never going to do anything to improve it.

    So I can have the browser adapt pages for most convenient viewing in Dolphin,Opera,android stock - *even* FF on the desktop. But not in this. Doesn't matter how fast it is, how many plugins, it fails at the simplest function of a browser - showing me the fscking page contents on a small screen device.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: no smart zoom or text reflow - Epic Fail

      Hmm, it reflows for me, pilot error, I suspect, "epic fail" :D

  15. Greg J Preece

    Firefox Mobile's been my default Android browser for a while now. It hasn't been nearly as fast as the built-in one, and not having Flash is a pain, but the extra functionality and sync with my desktop FF has been bloody useful. Plus, I quite like the fullscreen interface.

    These new updates sound like exactly the kick it's been needing. Hope it's not as buggy as other commenters are making out. (Though TBH I had this thing installed on beta 1 - it can't possibly be as bad as that was!)

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Greg,

      Try

      http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/mobile/aurora/

      This is the bleeding edge dev one. I keep it and Chrome beta sitting around on my phone- both seem pretty decent these days, actually. It is a huge improvement over the early Android firefoxes, they were just horrid piles of poop.

  16. Emilio Desalvo
    Childcatcher

    Awesome...

    "Awesome Screen"... "Awesome Bar..."

    Somebody from Mozilla "marketing" plays Munchkin too much...

    1. Greg J Preece

      Re: Awesome...

      Perhaps they're a big fan of Awesomenauts?

  17. Colin Critch
    Thumb Up

    Works Ok for Me

    Just gave new FF (on a LG X2, kernel 2.6.32.45 Cyanogenmod Android 2.3.7) a go and it is a LOT faster than the older version, even a bit faster than the Google browser.

  18. Pat 11

    Chrome privacy

    Just tried the newest Chrome beta (HTC One X) and have to say it is much smoother than anything else. Older versions were a privacy nightmare but they seem to have addressed many of my concerns - you can turn off all the obvious leakiness like pre-fetching, search completion and even specify a non-Google search engine. Unless the new Firefox is a big step up from the previous, I'll stick with Chrome for now.

    (though my default assumption is that if Google are making privacy easy to manage, they must have some covert way to subvert it!).

  19. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Why the non-IE drowser partisanship?

    Opera, Firefox, Chrome and Safari are awesome in their own ways.

    IE, on the other hand...let's just say that it is a blessing that no Android phone/iPhone/Symbian phone is using IE. And IE10 is still using the crappy Trident layout engine. Worse still, Microsoft wants all other browsers to develop a Metro version, so as to conform to the monstrous Windows 8 UI.

    To hell with Microsoft and IE, long live all other browsers.

    1. JDX Gold badge

      Re: Why the non-IE drowser partisanship?

      You betray your ignorance.

  20. Andy80

    Not available for HTC Desire

    For some reason??

    - This app is incompatible with your T-Mobile HTC HTC Desire.

  21. Ilgaz

    This is big deal, here is why

    People using Android, a lot of them use it because there isn't any other choice. People don't trust to google too (yes, average) and thanks to the anarchy in market, several assholes exist on Android market. Nobody (except very technical) knows what the hell is going on with their private data.

    Companies, including google are very unresponsive to feedback too.

    Now there is this thing which is completely open source, has developers which you can even irc coming to market and this time it performs too. Also it runs on 95% of devices.

    So, this is big news, really big for mobile.

    Ps: not a fan really, just stating facts via opera mobile on Android.

  22. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    No Adblock?

    I installed Firefox mobile, hoping I could get a decent browser that supported Flash (*when I want it!*) and Adblock Plus.

    So far, I cannot get it to install ABP - so what's the advantage over the built-in again?

  23. heyrick Silver badge

    "The open-source firm has had a version of its popular browser on little green phones since 2010, but it hasn't lit many Google-mobe-lovers' fires so far."

    Tried it about six months ago. Loaded at startup (v2.1, checking tasks and permissions) and whacked out around 46Mb memory for itself. Wasn't as slick as the default browser.

    I will try again once it is out of beta, especially when NoScript/ABP is ready (as browsing ad-laden sites on EDGE is painful).

  24. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Firefox for android will really take off when...

    ..Adblock Plus runs on it :)

    It really is that simple.

  25. Lamont Cranston

    That's nice,

    but I already have Opera on my phone (twice, for some reason), so I can't see that I'd want Firefox.

    Not really a productive comment, but it's been mentioned that this is a browser article, and pro-Opera comments are required.

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like