back to article Tevatron refines Higgs boson picture

“Unfortunately, this hint is not significant enough to conclude that the Higgs boson exists”, says Fermilab physicist Rob Roser – but the difficult last particle is getting closer to revealing its secrets. Today’s particle physics excitement comes from Fermilab results presented at a conference in La Thuille in Italy, where …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. Dick Emery
    Thumb Down

    I no see picture

    Pics or it didn't happen.

    1. Sir Runcible Spoon

      Sir

      A picture painted with words?

      1. Destroy All Monsters Silver badge
        Pint

        Re: Sir

        Maybe the pics here will enlighten you:

        http://www.science20.com/quantum_diaries_survivor/tevatron_higgs_results_confirm_lhc_signal-87751

    2. Jos
      Happy

      Re: I no see picture

      Maybe this will help :-)

      http://www.dilbert.com/2012-02-21/

      Cheers

      Jos

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Nice to see some life in the 'old machine' yet

    I hope we either find Higgs or we don't... Despite an obvious opportunity for a cat joke, whatever we discover, or don't, will open the doors to different ways of thinking that will drive humanity towards greater understanding.

    One of the best (off the wall) hopes we have is from this outfit

    http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/

    Sponsored by the guys at RIM none the less!

    http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/About/History/History/1/

    1. Destroy All Monsters Silver badge
      Boffin

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_mechanism

      Actually the old machine has been put out to pasture in September, so people are currently massaging the statistics.

      1. It wasnt me
        Unhappy

        Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_mechanism

        Its a bit presumptuous awarding yourself the boffin Icon isnt it? Try to RTFA before accusing people of "massaging the statistics". The article quite clearly stated that the Tevatron was shut down in September. Since you clearly didnt read the article, you might also like to know that they are currently processing a mountain of data, which is very, very different from massaging statistics. They have enough data to last until June.

        Presumably whoever upvoted you also just skipped foaming mouthed straight to the comments.

        1. Destroy All Monsters Silver badge

          Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_mechanism

          Dude!

          >currently processing a mountain of data

          >very, very different from massaging statistics

          Lay off the coffee or take a vacation, will you?

  3. Paul 129
    Thumb Up

    Awesome

    "In approaching their 10 inverse femtobarns of data"

    Love the teknobabble, I'll try that line on my next glassy eyed victim.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Awesome

      Pass me that there tinfoil hat, wudja, Bubba?

    2. Victor Ludorum
      WTF?

      Re: Awesome

      There I was, thinking a 'barn' was a new El Reg Unit of measurement...

      And a femtobarn was teeny tiny.

      And an inverse femtobarn was er, well, HUGE... A bit like an exabarn, maybe... Or a yottabarn...?

      1. Loyal Commenter Silver badge
        Coat

        Re: Awesome

        No, no, no - an inverse femtobarn is a very tiny barn which is either inside-out, or upside-down.

  4. Graham Wilson
    Thumb Up

    Some irony if Tevatron takes credit.

    It would be somewhat ironic if Tevatron ultimately took the credit for finding Higgs.

    The fact that Tevatron's data is still being massaged months after its closure is testament to the difficulty of the problem.

  5. anadish

    The problem with particle events in accelerators is that first we mostly postulate them theoretically then want to see them buried in a lot of noise. Just spotting a few of them makes us believe that our whole theory is right. However, it may not be so; they just could be freak fragments, like the ones we get after an earthquake, the fragments are not exactly what went into building those structures. Higgs boson also is part of that slightly deluding scientific approach.

    Gravity has roots in some very apparent physics. laugh it off, as it's not easy to realize that basic quantum leap itself is a source of gravitation.

    1. Burb
      WTF?

      @anadish

      I presume that was in a different language before you put it through Google translator?

  6. Pavlov's obedient mutt

    yeah, but so what

    at the (high) risk of sounding like a total dolt, what does it actually mean if they find it?

    Will it mean some boffin somewhere can create a time machine, or an FTL drive, or a Transporter beam, or a death-star ray gun?

    Its fabulously important sounding, but where does it take us (us=humanity..)

    1. ChrisPW

      Re: yeah, but so what

      It is unlikely to directly take us anywhere, but that isn't the point, the important thing is what we will be able to do with the knowledge later.

      Although we have use amounts of information about the properties of elements we are still regularly making discoveries that we can't explain (e.g. why does X go super-conductive in a magnetic field when at pressure?? Y & Z don't ...), understanding the building blocks will help us understand why and hopefully help us correctly predict those properties with a greater degree of accuracy. Then we can reduce the amount of "poke it and see what happens" science that is currently done because we will be able to predict with a high degree of confidence what will happen!

    2. Code Monkey

      Re: yeah, but so what

      Discoveries of this nature ALWAYS yield new technologies - we just don't know what they are, yet. The fun part will be finding out.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: yeah, but so what

        "we just don't know what they are, yet." Yes, perhaps that's why we call them "new"

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: yeah, but so what

      It means that yahweh and his mates can finally retire.

  7. Winkypop Silver badge
    Thumb Up

    We're gonna get you little higgsey!

    Oh yes we are!

  8. Martin Budden Silver badge
    WTF?

    enquiring mind(s)...

    I didn't think the Higgs boson "created mass" at all? I thought that proving existence of the particle will prove existence of the field, and the field is responsible for mass. Have I mis-remembered or is the article using a popular misconception?

    1. Richard Chirgwin (Written by Reg staff)

      Re: enquiring mind(s)...

      > I didn't think the Higgs boson "created mass" at all? I

      > thought that proving existence of the particle will prove

      > existence of the field, and the field is responsible for

      > mass. Have I mis-remembered or is the article using a

      > popular misconception?

      A "popular shorthand". I should know better. The Higgs boson, as I understand it, was the particle which in the very early universe mediated the interactions giving mass to matter (and please note that this is still greatly oversimplified and abbreviated).

      Richard Chirgwin

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like