A title
I seem to recall a guest at a windsor group hotel doing this a few years back.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/dorset/8272799.stm
Doctors at a Melbourne hospital have suggested hospitals Down Under would do well to lock up their hand sanitiser, after one patient got lashed on six bottles of antibacterial brew. According to a concerned letter in the Medical Journal of Australia, a 45-year-old chap with "a history of polysubstance misuse" was being treated …
Russian tourists drinking alcohol spiked with lavender extract (used to be popular as a general disinfectant and wound cleanse solution on the Balkans).
Buy a 250ml bottle for the today equivalent of 40p from a pharmacy, down it on the spot in front of it.
Drowsy dunno... More like bawdy...
This has been happening in UK hospitals for a while, when an alcoholic is submitted to some wards, they remove all the hand rub for this exact reason. Also fastening them down won't help as I've seen people move from ward to ward with a plastic cup, emptying the bottles.
This post has been deleted by its author
When you're an alcoholic you've basically got to have alcohol otherwise you go mental and go into a fit/seizure so anything will do. Having said that most Alkies go for the mouthwash before the hand sanitizer and aftershave. Aftershave is usually the last on the list only because it comes out in tiny drops.
As previously noted this is a common problem.
However, all alcohols are anti-microbial. Methanol and isopropyl alcohol work just as well and have the added advantages of being fatal in lower amounts than ethanol. Bugs and burdens upon society removed at a stroke.
On a more serious note, there are many better anti-microbials than alcohol available. The problem is that nobody - esp. the NHS - will go against the WHO recommendations, that are decades out of date, for fear of being sued.
Why do all journos compare blood levels of drunken people to an arbitraty level that is deemed to be safe.
Its not like there is a level that is "A bit drunk", "very pissed" and then "wankered". Yet they use "perfectly ok to drive a car" as the guideline.
Makes no sense whatsoever.
I recall a similar story about this sort of thing going on in one or two prisons as well. Alcohol-based hand-gel in the visitors centre somehow mysteriously ending up in the main establishment.
Is Genial Harry Grout aware of this and alive to the possible profit-related ventures therein?
...but also automotive fuel.
Yes, 30 years ago automotive ethanol (in Brasil, mind you) had no additives. You guessed it, 98% spirits at 30p per liter (or try to think something really cheap). Cheaper than water back then. For something related to human addiction. Sold 10 gallons at a time.
People soon caught up. So the gas stations and oil companies.
There was even a joke (more like a TV gag) about a man inserting some sugar, ice cubes and lemons in a car tank...
Used to be the name given to methylated spirits, kept in the fridge in outback petrol stations...
You can put what you like in it, but a determined alcoholic will drink it anyway, and if he can't drink because he has throat cancer...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/14/darwin_awards_2007/
Were I work they purchased a case of hand sanitizer for kids, it contained no alcohol.
Nobody would use the kid stuff though because it contains no alcohol and does not dry unless you use a towel.
That crap mysteriously disappeared and we are using the regular alcohol based stuff again, which dries very quickly.