back to article Farting death camels must die to save the world!

An Adelaide-based entrepreneur has hit upon a novel method of fighting global warming: he intends to exterminate Australia's vast population of feral camels by means of gunfire from helicopters and jeeps, so preventing the beasts from unleashing a deadly planet-wrecking miasma of greenhouse gas from their rumbling guts. The …


This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. Anonymous Coward

    Farting death humans must die to save the world

    Why not shoot a few humans, I think they produce far more pollution than feral camels.

    1. Anonymous Coward


      Certainly those from certain countries down-under who like wasting resources on firearms anyway!

    2. Anonymous Coward

      @ Martijn Otto

      Yes, killing people for their "eco sins" is quite a popular Greanpeace / Warmist position I understand - see e.g. the 10:10 video.

      1. hplasm

        As long as it is

        the guy who invented the Carbon Credit system, it's a good idea.

      2. Fred Flintstone Gold badge

        10:10 Video

        I didn't see anything in the Age of Stupid that suggested killing people to save the planet. Or are you talking about a different movie?

    3. Bill Neal

      Emu War

      Didn't Australia learn their lesson from the Emu War? look it up. The humans lost.

    4. Originone

      Claiming non humans as a carbon offset.

      My wife and I have decided to have only one child. I like to tell people its to minimise our carbon footprint for the horrified looks i get.

      Hmm, maybe condom manufactures and other producers of contraception should be talking to the government about carbon credits.

  2. Anonymous Coward

    Sounds like an excellent idea...

    Because dead things *never* emit any methane or CO2! Nor does flying around in helicopters and driving cross vast sections of the desert in trucks.

    Get moving on this now before logic and rational thinking derail your plans!

    1. JimC

      Why would you think...

      there might be any connection between carbon credits and logic and rational thinking?

    2. Sir Sham Cad

      This isn't about being green

      It's about a business opportunity based on the trading of carbon credits and probably a fair bit of coin from people who want to hang out of helicopter gunships blasting the everliving shit out of some mustelids with high calibre weaponry.

      The fact that the working of carbon credits allows this idea to even seem viable reflects on the state of the CC scheme very, very badly.

      1. pyroweasel

        Farting weasel?

        "blasting the everliving shit out of some mustelids"

        Camelids, surely? What harm did mustelids ever do?

        1. M Gale

          Badger badger badger badger

          Mushroom Mushroom?

          Oh come on, that must be more damaging to sanity than any amount of camels. Die, I say. Die!

        2. Sir Sham Cad

          Le sigh

          I knew it was Camelids but had a wonkypodium article on Mustelids open in another tab. I accept this Fail icon.

          I'm sure there's money to be made out of offering put-upon rabbits the chance to get in a small helicopter and take hot lead-based vengeance on the mustelids, though.

          When's beer-o-clock?

      2. mhenriday

        Sir Sham, if it's Mustelidae they're out after,

        then it's more likely your pet ferret that's in danger. But from Mr Page's article - and his articles, as we know, always epitomise the Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing But TheTruth, as exemplified by his authoritative excursions into what *really* happened at Fukushima) - I get the definitive impression that it's rather members of the family Camelidae that these would-be helicopter jockeys want to have in their sights....


    3. Allan George Dyer


      before shooting, they should calculate the projected greenhouse gas output during the camel's expected life and balance that against the decomposition gasses now and at the end of its natural life, plus the fuel use of the hunting vehicles. On this basis, they should favour shooting the baby camels (greatest life expectancy, larger body to decompose when adult).

      Alternatively, maybe they should focus on preventing camel reproduction. While the idea of Australians rushing round the Outback with camel condoms has a certain appeal, mosquito control methods might be more practical. Breed large numbers of sterile male camels and release them to out-compete the fertile males, causing a decline in the population.

      Of course, if you're selling carbon-credits based on the number of camels shot, you certainly don't want a decrease in the population, so you'll shoot the old (past breeding age) and non-dominant males. Can you spell Conflict of Interest?

      Icon: pregnancy test sample from camel.

    4. Sorry that handle is already taken. Silver badge

      I suspect...

      ...he's done more modelling on the issue than you have. Just a hunch.

  3. ardubbleyu

    a deadly planet wrecking miasma

    'nuff said really...

    1. Figgus

      "reeking", surely?


  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    How about...

    Rounding them up, and harvesting their bottom burps to generate electricity?

    1. Anonymous Coward

      To enhance this....

      Put the camels in giant hamster wheels to generate yet more electricity - at the same time!

      1. Vladimir Plouzhnikov


        This was actually a real Greenpeacnik's proposal, albeit he suggested to use horses, not camels...

  5. Marvin the Martian

    Cheaper to do it the traditional way?

    I'm wondering about carbon credits needed to keep whirlybirds in the air; can't be little.


    1/ Wait for drought (easy -- ongoing since 10+y... which means it's NOT a drought but a wrongly-assessed climate; they just counted peak rainfall years as "normal" instead of exceptionally wet),

    2/ leave tap to drip (to attract camels),

    3/ shoot/electrocute/club to death as desired,

    4/ buy sheep (or harvest as above) plus 10kg dates

    5/ build clay oven,

    6/ cook camel stuffed with sheep stuffed with dates,


    8/ profit!

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      "club to death"

      I would pay good money to watch someone try to club a camel to death. My wager would be on the camel.

      1. Luther Blissett

        Mine too

        Those humps could store enough beer or G&T to keep a camel out of a club for months.

    2. Anonymous Coward


      Or how about Camel-con-carne? Yum.

      On second thoughts probably would result in a net gain in methane what with the kidney beans.

    3. Destroy All Monsters Silver badge

      "it's NOT a drought but a wrongly-assessed climate"

      I know I can relax when my doc says that I am affected with a wrongly assessed resilient migrating cell structure.

    4. Fred Flintstone Gold badge

      Umm - don't forget..

      Methane emitting camels need to build that gas somewhere. They may be explosive near an oven..


  6. Captain Scarlet


    But why not be green and go on foot?

    1. Anonymous Coward

      RE: Lovely

      Or they could go out on camels.

    2. Figgus


      I'd walk a mile to shoot a camel!

      /apologies to the young 'uns and non-smokers.

  7. jake Silver badge

    Yeah, sure, right ...

    How many sheep are there in Oz? How many feral camels?

    How many feral humans, for that matter ... do the math(s).

    Tim Moore's a con artist, at best. A self-serving publicist, at worst.

    1. Gordon 10
      Thumb Up

      but but

      You say that like its a bad thing.

      Although he has missed a trick. There are probably people who you pay for the privilege of shooting said camels.

  8. lglethal Silver badge

    OK its just marketing...

    Ok i think we all agree this is about as Green as a cricket ball (im talking colour here folks), but hey anyone who wants to go and wipe out one of the humungous numbers of pests we have roaming Australia deserves a bit of funding in my opinion.

    And at least hes not going the traditional "ask the government (re every taxpayer) for a handout" route and is trying the "ask the gullible (or companies that want to appear more green then they actually are) for a handout" route...

    I wish him the best of luck! (for getting the funding and for wiping out the feral camels!)

    1. ArmanX

      This is actually what I was thinking...

      1) Find a pest you want to get rid of (camels)

      2) Spin it so your animal-slaughtering ways actually sound environmentally conscious (camel farts will kill the planet)

      3) Get someone to pay you to kill the pests (angry farmers, distressed towns), someone else to pay you for making the pests not do the environmentally harmful thing (dead camels don't pass gas, nor do they reproduce to make more gas-passers), and yet another person to pay you for the remains (dog food)

      4) Make out like a mercenary and get paid three times (profit!)

      Sounds like sound business sense if he can pull it off... easy money, the farmers/towns are happy, the government gets to pretend they're doing something for the environment, and dogs get a new flavor; everyone wins!

  9. MarkB
    Black Helicopters

    Other opportunities to profit?

    The new green safari tour, charging mugs^Wcustomers $$$ to come to OZ to shoot camels.

    1. GrumpyOldBloke

      Other opportunities to profit?

      Not here in Oz, we follow a strict - guns are bad - policy, unless of course they are in the hands of the state.

  10. Tom 7

    Its a lot greener than you'd think

    the real reason behind the cull is the camel is a non-native to Oz and is really making a real mess of the outback and destroying one of the oldest ecosystems on the planet.

    This is just one way of paying for the cleanup.

    I do like Marvin the Martins idea of camel stuffed with sheep stuffed with dates - camels a nice meat.

    1. Fred Flintstone Gold badge


      .. if you don't sheer the sheep beforehand it will be a meal high in fiber..

      Woolly coat, please..

    2. nyelvmark

      destroying one of the oldest ecosystems on the planet

      Well, you should look on it as an opportunity to upgrade. Why not replace that aging ecosystem with a new high-tech one? Some of the newer models are offering automatic garbage collection, which has to be a good thing, innit?

  11. Anonymous Coward

    RE: OK its just marketing...

    It's true Green is Red. As in red like communist Russia red. Greens are the ultimate socialists. They have to be to force the rest of us to bow down before their wisdom and their demands. Including such fabian ideas as eugenics.

    As for not asking the government for handouts. Sorry, but he is. Who pays for the government handouts? The tax payer. When businesses have to pay increased taxes (including carbon taxes), who pays? The consumer. Now he isn't directly asking for money from the government but the money has to come from somewhere. Increased energy prices will be the result.

    1. Anonymous Coward


      I believe this is the appropriate term

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      We're all communists now.

      Even Ron Paul.

      I do wish you people would learn a little about those soft subjects you hate so much before commenting on them. Go look up green libertarianism, or free-market environmentalism.

      Your knowledge of politics is roughly twice the size of fuck all.

  12. informavorette

    BTW, Isn't a camel a huge nitrogen+carbon sink?

    What an utter disrespect for established Australian traditions!

    Surely, the proper solution is import a few feral hyenas to get the terrible camel problem under control. Or lions. Yep, lions would be better. They'll eat the critters in no time. Ecosphere saved.

  13. Anonymous Coward

    Surely it would be easier

    To breed the camels in captivity, then lead them out and pop them off to claim the carbon credits, meaning less expense and fuel-related carbon emissions on chasing them down?

    *Looks for the 'stop the planet I want to get off' icon*

  14. DJV Silver badge

    He should...

    He should pop over here and bag a few of those in Westminster whose main aim in life seems to be to produce hot air...

    1. Fred Flintstone Gold badge

      However ..

      .. they are the reason you have sunshine in the week. As soon as they go for the weekend you end up with a low pressure zone and the rain moves in. Just check the statistics - works for the city too..

  15. Flocke Kroes Silver badge

    If you exterminate the farting camels ...

    ... you will end up with more farting kangaroos.

    1. Vladimir Plouzhnikov

      'cause in Australia

      Camels're eating kangaroos?

    2. Anonymous Coward

      Roos don't fart

      @Flocke Kroes: 'Roos don't fart - their intestinal flora convert methane to acetate, which is then re-absorbed by the roo as food.

      So what you need to do is get the intestinal flora from a 'roo into the camels. Hold still Mr. Camel and ignore what I'm about to do with this hose....

      Perhaps Mike Row needs some new material to film?

      Flames for the result of burning H4C.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward


      I thought that was one thing kangaroos were famous for not doing.

    4. a cynic writes...

      Not a problem...

      Kangaroo farts are methane free:

      The meat tastes nice too but not as good as ostrich.

    5. Michael Xion

      Kangaroos don't fart

      They are in fact one of the 'greenest' meats you can get. Sustainable, pefectly matched to the ecology and the meat is high in protein and low in fat.

  16. Tom Pittman

    Better ROI...

    The can achieve much higher volume at lower unit cost by claiming carbon credits for cattle and sheep as they are butchered.

  17. Suburban Inmate

    Climate damage: CH4 > CO2

    Gaffer tape zippos to the camels' arses and convert the methane into less damaging carbon dioxide and water vapour.

    Added bonus: Firefly style light show for the folks on the ISS.

    1. TeeCee Gold badge

      @Suburban Inmate

      Brilliant! In order to take this further, I suggest badging sneaking up on a wild camel and shoving a lit zippo up its arse as a new Extreme Sport.

      That should sort out the minor problem of finding sufficient volunteers daft enough to do it.

  18. Mr Young

    Pathetic excuse

    Let ME fly about in a helicopter shooting at things instead! Are these carbon credit thingies like real paper money now? I thought they were pretty much discredited - maybe I have to look again?

    1. Destroy All Monsters Silver badge


      >>real paper money

      Fartist camels and inflationist governments.

      They muddy thought.

    2. Tom 13

      No, they're not like real paper money -

      paper money loses its value the longer you keep it, carbon credit thingies go up in value the longer you keep them.

  19. Alphabet Soup 1

    Eating camel

    Roos are great eating but having eaten camel I reckon they pretty much taste how they look -

    there used to be a camel-trekking place near Alice Springs that had the tagline "book early and get a good-looking one!".

    While we're on the subject; a few years ago there were estimated to be more feral pigs than humans here in Australia.

    Time this had another airing:

  20. Anonymous Coward

    Back-of-an-envelope calculation.

    1 camel = 45kg of methane per year.

    1 helicopter = 50 gallons of fuel per hour.

    Without actually doing the maths, I'd guesstimate that it's of the order of either camels have to live hundreds of years or you have to be up, shoot one and back in your 'copter in about two minutes, before this could possibly break even.

    1. ArmanX

      Hmm... more calculation...

      Now, if the helicopter uses avgas, which is roughly 6 lb/gal, at the rate of 50 gal/hr, and given that burning avgas produces 3 lb of CO2 per lb of fuel, you'll see about 900 lb/hr of carbon released into the air for every hour airborne.

      Given that the camels were estimated to save roughly 1 ton of CO2 each upon death, that means he'll need to kill an average of one camel every 2.22 hours to break even. Carbon-wise, anyway.

      On the other hand, if it were a Jeep at say, 5 MPG, with standard gasoline, again 6 lb/gal, but at 6 lb CO2 per lb of fuel, that's roughly 7.2 pounds CO2 per mile, so you'd need to travel less than 278 miles (447 km) to break even.

  21. Anonymous Coward

    Can't be a 'real' Ozzie

    ... Moore tells the Financial Times, "especially when they start coming into town and kicking down your toilet."

    As any real Okker fule know, the correct phrase (and curse) is

    "May your chooks turn into emus,

    And kick your dunny down."

    I leave the translation as an exercise for non-native Strine speakers.

    Anyway, why not export the camels back to the Middle East from whence they came? They'll need them when the black gold runs out and all the Toyotas grind to a halt.

    As there's no 'Skippy' icon, I'll have to use the XXXX one.

  22. Ray 8

    as long..

    as long as the dont get the hump...

    OK I know I'll get my coat

  23. Sven Coenye

    Who'da thunk...

    Jeff Minter, visionary... Just beware of their Revenge...

  24. Anonymous Coward

    Camel meat tho...

    I hear they're pretty delicious...

  25. Martin Maloney


    Oops -- I misread that as "dromedairies."

    You know, the places where you go to buy camel milk.

  26. Alfred 2

    Am I the only one ....

    ... who read the title and thought this was going to be about a new shoot em up game?

    It's the sort of thing that used to be on the old Vic-20

  27. Wayland Sothcott 1

    If methane is so bad compared to CO2

    then why are we no allowed to burn our orgainic rubbish but instead have it composted 'for the environment'?

  28. TRT Silver badge
    IT Angle

    Is he...

    Is he going to partner up with Jeff Minter?

  29. PeterM42


    Why not shoot all the "green" activists and so-calle scientists who spout more hot air even than politicians.

    Mmmmm... perhaps we could shoot all the politicians too.

    By the way, in case the "greens" hadn't noticed, the rainforests are INCREASING in density and absorbing more CO2. Ain't nature wonderful, it even makes adjustments for politicians and "green" activists.

  30. Graham Wilson

    I wonder what tree/flora Dr Moore has in mind to actually collect carbon credits.

    Next Dr Tim Moore will be suggesting that humans should be eliminated from the planet. And I wonder what animal--err sorry tree/flora--he has in mind to actually collect the carbon credits.

    Whether Dr Moore is a Greenie or just an opportunist has yet to be determined, but listening to his voice the former is more likely. Deep Greenies are already hell-bent on eliminating elements 17 and 80 from the periodic table, so does Dr Moore intend to add element 6 to the list as well? Perhaps, he's even dreaming of ways to stop the triple-alpha process in stars so the universe doesn't produce this filthy putrid carbon* stuff.

    Camels are a pest in Australia but to put a bounty on them because of carbon credits really shows how Deep Greenies truly think. In recent years they've sniffed a little power, now their true colours are beginning to show

    Had Dr Moore been born 50 years earlier his intrinsic psychopathology probably had seen him become a minister of religion but today such people enter the next best thing--eco science/administration or Greenpeace etc. Tragically, such people are just debasing environmental engineering/science, which incidentally, should be properly integrated with many other scientific/engineering disciplines. This 'traditional science and engineering is against us' mentality only isolates them from mainstream technology and only slows down many solutions to the world's many problems.

    With the exception of the U.S., the failure or very substantive down-cline in the West of traditional religion is a serious and much unexpected problem as there's few places for the religiously-inclined to be absorbed or employed. In the past, the vagaries of and inconsistencies in doctrine could occupy such people for a whole lifetime. Now they're foist upon the world to right it. If I'm counting correctly, it's as if a 10th Crusade had started and all we carbon-lovers are its victims. (Incidentally, it's very informative to compare religious belief in Europe with that of the U.S. In Europe where only 20% of the population have strong religious beliefs, environmentalism has an enormous following, whereas in the U.S. where the reverse applies--80% strong religious belief--environmentalism is comparatively weak. The loss of traditional religious belief and concomitant strengthening of environmental beliefs is uncanny, and I'm far from the only one who's noticed it).

    Sure, there are some excellent environmentalists who are rational, educated and who actually examine data but others run purely on feeling and or instinct. And to boot, many are down outright ignorant of anything scientific. Science and technology frighten them. I live in Sydney and about a decade ago there was a strong push to ensure the Olympic village was developed with eco-friendly materials, no PVC etc. Well, I had a woman actually tell me that it wouldn’t be many years before environmentalists had chlorine banned from the planet--she said it could and would be eliminated. And there was no mistake, she wasn't referring to Cl compounds rather elemental chlorine. I call this the Element-17 problem, one daren’t mention the 'Cl' word when Deep Greenies are around but one can generally mention 17 in hushed tones without attracting too much attention.

    In recent times, it seems too that element 80 and now 6 have been similarly stigmatised. (Think back some months to the El Reg news story about Bletchley Park and the banning of mercury delay lines; much the same stuff was covered by many in the posts.)

    Such beliefs are becoming commonplace; and it's almost a certainty that the downturn in science education over the past 40 or so years is largely responsible. When a person is able to go completely through schooling without any science subjects we should not be surprised

    Unfortunately, Greenies have an unusually strong hold of our politicians for two reasons: most politicians have stuff-all knowledge of science and engineering as politicians are mainly lawyers, accountants and economists and thus are more convinced by the wistful plaintive rhetoric of Greenies to that of hard dull facts of techies.

    As I see it, techies of all persuasions, especially those from traditional engineering and science really do need to speak out loudly against such nonsense before it's too late.


    * Hey, a nice pristine planet, but there's a minor problem of having no universe to support it (unless he also wants to tweak a few universal constant too). >:-)

This topic is closed for new posts.