back to article Don't let China hold rare-earths to ransom again

We're all screwed over this China rare earths thing, aren't we? After five weeks of withholding shipments, the Chinese seem to have let some of them go again, but if they can keep their precious cargo to ransom once, they can do it again, can't they? The problem is, as those who stayed awake in chemistry class will know, that …


This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. Anonymous Coward

    Landfill mining

    Surely this is the easiest way to get our hands on these elements?

  2. ravenviz Silver badge

    Jobs for the masses

    Sounds like Cameron's just found the jobs he needs to long term unemployed to be doing, and getting paid for.

    1. Daniel Garcia 2


      High techs chemistry and metallurgy plants are clearly where you average C.H.A.V. will be at best used.

      1. Anonymous Coward

        Chav no

        But the hundreds, or even thousends, of ex steel and aluminium workers in places like Rotherham and Cardiff, from shop floor workers up to chemical engineers. People with skills and experience. They will be able to run high teck chemistry and metallurgy plants.

  3. Anonymous Coward

    I am Missing The Strategic Angle

    China is a single economic entity - they can subsidize any sort of product for five years, wait until the competition dies and then they inflate prices for this sort of product by 1000%.

    The only way to defend against this is to dump Thatcherism/Reaganism/ayn randsim, at least in the orthodox Anglosaxon form.

    It becomes very clear now that a considerable dose of Mercantilism

    is needed to protect your economy from China and Russia. These two countries can corner every single raw materials market with the method described in my first sentence.

    So what we need for the European Union is a new form of good old Industrial Policy. We have world-beating companies like Airbus, Ariane, Air Liquide, BP, Shell, VW exactly because the government cared. What we now need is to control diversity of raw materials procurement and we need Critial Raw Material Reserves for at least five years of consumption.

    Time to ditch the M.B.A. guys and focus at Ecole Nationale D'Administration graduates. They are instilled loyalty to the state, not Naked Greed.

    Now, dear Anglos, flame me to hell.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: I am Missing The Strategic Angle

      "So what we need for the European Union is a new form of good old Industrial Policy."

      Warning lamp is now lit: when the EU gets involved in industrial policy, it quickly becomes a matter of funnelling cash to "industry champions" who are often the huge companies that have been around forever lobbying for a tighter grip on whatever market they want 100% of.

      "We have world-beating companies like Airbus, Ariane, Air Liquide, BP, Shell, VW exactly because the government cared."

      In BP's case, quite literally world-beating. Or, more precisely, ecosystem-beating.

      Sure, the EU should encourage long-term thinking. They should also wave the big stick at big companies who probably like nasty materials processing going on somewhere they can't see if the prices are low enough at this very moment.

    2. Vladimir Plouzhnikov

      Or, the French view...

      Tax, tax, tax everything, hand all the money to the elite, then strike, strike, strike.

      Thanks, but no, thanks. Communist Chauvinism (or is it Chauvinist Communism) is not a viable economic model.

      1. Anonymous Coward

        @Vladimir Plouzhnikov:Muhahahahaha

        So that "communism" owns 50% of the large Aircraft market, leads the Space Launch market, leads the Liquid Gas market, has a major car industry which sells world-wide, has the World Leader in CAD/CAM, makes the best food you can find on the globe, makes missiles which have sunk more than one anglosaxon warship recently (though not fired by french forces), make their own SLBM, their own fighter plane, their own tank, have medical service for everybody.

        Yeah, I'll take la Menue Communiste Francaise, with Red Wine please.

        I guess you are one of these sorry inhabitants of Canary Wharf and you are offended that there is an alternative to the destructive ideology your friends cherish.

        Vive La France, to Hell with Anglosaxon Bankers. That's what I say.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Here's an angle for you:

      The chinese basically own us. That's the US, but also Europe. They like as not don't *want* to crush "us" because it means all the paper they're sitting on becomes obviously useless as opposed to merely that much financial junk.

      Besides, these guys are sneaky. Just as they're nodding assent to the US on its copyright demands only to proceed using the same copyright mechanisms against US companies, to this there may very well be an entirely different angle, and one of for our politicians staggering long term vision to boot.

      Recall that they're buying up any raw stuff like crazy? They're looking at a rather big chunk of population that is going to demand wealth and prosperity just like everyone else. That's going to take some serious amounts rare earths, so they're not going to wait until demand rises enough that we start scrambling. Better to get us scrambling *now* and have the metals on the cheap later. Because of course they're going to copy our fancy new processes.

      What's better than sitting on the world's only mined large pile of rare earths, the workforce to extract it with brute force, and also using it for near-term political gain? Why, if you're securing future cheap access, it's having that pile and access to fresly-reopened piles of more of the same elsewhere, and a better process to drive your own costs down too.

      And the near-term political boons? By then the papers will have matured and they'll own even more of us, so they just get to dictate what they want on the shareholder meetings. They will find another way if this no longer works.

      Come to think of it, any boon extracted by cutting rare earth access is nice but their real interests are with raw materials. I wouldn't be surprised if they'd planned this five or ten years ago and just decided the time was right and the occasion was there. The Chinese don't need to do American style gunboat politicking. They would be far happier to just get what they really want and for the rest of the world to not catch on too much. Much easier that way.

      1. Danny 14

        not such a great idea though

        yes but technology advances. Look at the same issue with mercury and lead in the 70% when CRTs were in demand. Same again in years to come, a different mineral will be needed.

        1. Vladimir Plouzhnikov


          "Yeah, I'll take la Menue Communiste Francaise, with Red Wine please"

          Yeah, you take it. I'll pass.

  4. JasonW

    The Japanese...

    ... are starting to mine their old dumps for the "tech" gear to recover the metals from for just this reason and being Japan they have previously dumped lots and lots of tech gear.

  5. fixit_f
    Thumb Up


    Articles like this are the reason I still read the Reg, even if you have to sift through the dross about iPhones to get to them

  6. Anonymous Coward

    OT: Well Done, Mr Cameron

    After Cameron talked to Obama, all the nasty rhetoric was quickly scaled down. Good job, Mr Cameron.

    We can't allow them to destroy our champions, and the Japanese also better grow some teeth. Recently the merkins tried to destroy Toyota with completely fabricated allegations. They made an awful show in congress with the japanese CEO of Toyota. Exactly the same they attempted with Audi more than ten years ago.

    The merkisn have to know the alternative: A world economy w/o Merkina. A security architecture were they don't have bases in England, Germany and Japan. Or become sane.

  7. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward


    They are not rare and there are plenty of sources everywhere including north america. We just like to use the slave camp that is China to do our dirty work so we can pretend we are Green and clean. They ruin their own country and we get what we want cheap.

    Looks like we will be reducing our own land in the west into hugh slagheaps of toxic waste again then...

  8. Loyal Commenter Silver badge

    The Kroll Process?

    Because Halide chemistry is clean and non polluting; also Fosters lager is made from the tears of angels and the pope is currently off celebrating Divali.

    Honestly, I can't think of many things which are nastier and more toxic than various transition metal chlorides (I'm thinking SnCl4 here). I don't know about lanthanides, but I can't imagine they'd be any different.

  9. James Pickett

    Not so serious

    CRT's ... Yes, I remember them. And isn't Europium available in Europe - or am I taking this all too literally..?

  10. Tim Worstal

    Landfill mining

    Well, yes. But it depends what you're trying to get. If anyone's throwing out an old MRI machine I'll happily take that lutetium crystal off your hands and make a few thousand $ from it.

    Similarly, chewing up old motherboards for the gold, tin, copper, lead makes good sense.

    However, disassembling hard drives to get the few grammes of neodymium in the magnets probably doesn't make financial sense. Cheaper to buy new product.

    As so often, the true answer is "it depends".

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Thumb Up

      Crustal abundance

      Tim - I love the article, excellent.

      I would have thought electronics scrap, particularly hard drives to be a worthwhile source, the magnets are pretty chunky (and great fun to play with).

      The whole thing reminds me of the efforts to corner the market in Silver circa 1976, it failed spectacularly because an increasing price liberates huge "uneconomic" reserves.

      Its worth looking at:

      to see that all these rare earths aren't so rare really. I expect the chinese have kept the price low so as to buy up the easy sources at a good price. Now we will see a return to their inherent price, and this will make it economic to extract them from the tailings of other mining operations, like the red sludge you mention.

      Hats off to the Chinese for having the foresight to work out the long term inherent price and to make a position, shame on us for not.

      Two other points, firstly Palladium, used to cost the same as silver, wasn't much commercial demand for it, sold way under its "inherent" price, until it didn't.

      Secondly, Erbium - useless greyish white soft metal, now a superstar because of Erbium doped fibre amplifiers - I predict all of the rare earths will find some special use sooner or later, though there is a risk that you might end up holding the exception, the one truly useless metal.

  11. Pinkerton

    Forward thinking? Nah - it'll never catch on!

    Why get organised and do something in good time when you can leave it until the shit is about to hit the fan and then do it all at the last minute?

    I'm convinced the world is run by students!

    1. Baskitcaise

      Forward thinking? Nah - it'll never catch on!

      They could call it "JIT Shit", however I am not convinced about the "Just" as it seems to have happened already.

  12. James Pickett


    "They are not rare and there are plenty of sources everywhere"

    That sounds plausible. It would be a very strange quirk of nature that put all the Lanthanides inside one political border...

    1. John Smith 19 Gold badge

      @James Pickett

      "That sounds plausible. It would be a very strange quirk of nature that put all the Lanthanides inside one political border..."

      Well it is a very *big* political border.

      OTOH the classic counter example is Israel. Middle of the Middle east but more active oil wells in Suffolk (55 barrels a day IIRC)

  13. Tim Worstal

    Oh yes, it is

    "And isn't Europium available in Europe"

    Very much so. It's used as the phosphor in euro banknotes (you know, to make the notes fluoresce under the note checkers?).

    You can just see the banknote designers hugging themselves with glee after they'd thought that one up, can't you?

  14. Tom Womack

    Lanthanide halides don't behave like UF6

    The Kroll process sounds reasonable at first sight, but most of the lanthanides really only go to oxidation state +3 (the ones that don't you can separate out much more easily by taking advantage of that), so I don't see how you get enough fluorines around them to get nice volatile compounds like the transition metal highest-valency fluorides. The lanthanide trifluorides seem to be nice solid things, melting around 1500C (without much range in the melting points, so the distillation's not going to be completely straightforward) and used in glasses for infra-red lenses and optic fibres.

    The bromides are a bit more volatile, and probably the iodides even better, but I'd be very worried about thermal decomposition.

    You could go to organolanthanides or borohydrides, but coating the reactor with LaB6 seems like the beginning of quite an expensive day, and I'd be impressed if Gd(tBu)3 could be distilled without decomposing.

  15. Richard Gadsden 1
    Thumb Up

    The Germans are really good at fractional distillation

    A lot of Germany's reputation as great chemists and chemical engineers comes from a tradition of incredibly precise high-grade fractional distillations.

    If I wanted a company to do something like the Kroll process to separate lanthanides by fractional distillation of halide salts, then I know I'd be talking to BASF or IG Farben or Bayer.

    1. Anonymous Coward

      IG Farben

      ..does not really exist any more. There is still a kind of holding company, but IG Farben was dissolved by the allies because it was seen as a part of the Nazi war machine.

      Afaik, IG Farben was a kind of "super-company" which included all major German chemical companies, including Hoechst and BASF.

      Today, BASF is the largest chemical company of the globe, as measured by revenue. I don't have the slightest doubt that Europeans companies (like BASF, ICI or Sanofi) could produce any raw material required. The issue here is that the Chinese cornered the market. All the technology/pollution problems can be controlled. It's all a matter of planning and economics. If you spend serious money, you can safely produce rare earths in Frankfurt Höchst, just 10 kms from the Messe Tower.

      This is a political issue, not a technological.

  16. Tim Worstal

    Tom W

    Yes, this has been looked at. Chlorides work, although not for all of them (one way is to explioit the way in which some trichlorides are not stable and collapse (err, I'm not a chemist, but you know what I mean, indeed, you mention it) to dichlorides.

    Iodides are indeed better, some Japanese work seems to show that you could extract in one iteration. But iodine is expensive and chlorine isn't.

    We're trying to explore these very points ourselves right now. You're right that this might not be the correct "smart way" to do it but doesn't change my faith in there being "a" smart way.

  17. Shooter

    @ Tim Worstal

    "... talk to a stockbroker without gagging"

    << You, sir, owe me a new keyboard.

  18. Matt Bryant Silver badge

    Hooooooo boy, here we go again!

    Those with longer memories will recall the same thing - "we can do it better than Johnny Foreigner can do it cheaper" - as reasoning not to resist the gradual slide to dependency on foreign oil. In fact, we were so greedy for cheap oil we ended up sending our finest engineering minds to help the Arab oil cartel build a better machine to adict our economies with. All that will happen is the Chinese will form a one-party cartel and then set the price and export levels to ensure they get the maximum profit (and keep it in the smallest number of elites' bank accounts) whilst we happilly pour our money into their hands in the vain belief that we could stop if we wanted to. Face it, we're going to put ourselves in hock to the Chinese regardless of how clever our chemists are.

  19. Anonymous Coward

    "Lanthanide halides don't behave like UF6"

    The title got my attention given that I'd already wondered about the separation processes in use for those particular ingrediments, but the content lost me.

    WHY can't we centrifuge them like we do UF6? Centrifuging is pretty good at separating stuff with different masses, isn't it?

    1. Anonymous Coward

      Erm, yes and no

      Well, centrifuging is the only way to separate U235 from U237, it does work, but its hugely expensive - requiring hundreds of acres of expensive centrifuges to produce grams per day., and even then it is merely enriched to 15% or 35%. Look at the price of enriched U235 (erm, not the best search terms to enter, btw) - compared to rare earths.

  20. PhilBack
    Thumb Up

    Great Article. Back to raw!

    Maybe this is prefiguring the new tech. New stuff, instead of the same old again and again.

  21. John Smith 19 Gold badge

    Kroll sounds like the process used to purify Silicon for single crystal growth.

    That process seems quite well understood.

    The materials compatibility (with the process targeting multiple different wanted metals rather than one)

    A variation on the process used to purify Nickel, using metal carbonyls (that's carbon monoxide side chains to the metal) might also work. Highly toxic when decomposed but (in principle) the raw materials (carbon and oxygen) should be readily available.

    Caveat IANACE. But I doubt most of the people pursuing this are either. Still if the technology/raw material price vs concentration investment and toxicity trade offs are reasonable someone could make a lot of cash out this.

  22. Rob Dobs

    One more silent attack against the world by China

    This country is aggressive and will surely start expansion efforts of their borders sometime in the next few decades as they rise to a new superpower status. Why oh why do our politicians let this greedy thieving country rob us blind left and right and continue to build leverage against the rest of the world.

    Sure plenty all countries are competing and trying to move ahead, China makes itself unique in the systematic, government orchestrated way that the people of China steal IP property from the rest of the world. And I don't just mean copying CD's, movies and games. Corporations in China like ZTE and Huaweii are privy to Government espionage and hacking efforts. I am certain that the reason you can buy an exact duplicate of a hummer in China, is not because Hummer licensed them to, they stole the plans and designs, or simple reverse engineer. There is not a clear separation of government backed and corporate backed dollars.

    Now with the RETARDED US supreme court saying OK to unlimited foreign purchasing of our elections (against 100s of years of precedent), the Chinese can simply come in and buy out the votes in the US, and then move on to the Euroland....

    Learn Chinese or boycott Chinese goods, I see one or the other having to happen eventually....

  23. John Savard

    The Real Problem

    No private entrepreneur outside China is going to be able to produce rare earths more cheaply than China if and when China decides to sell them without conditions again. So, because China is perfectly capable of doing that, anything but a small short-term investment is not on.

    The only way we will get supply security is if either governments fund and own the production, or if they provide protectionist guarantees to domestic suppliers.

  24. Anonymous Coward

    another Sinophobia article from the west

    USA use to be the large produce of these element, until they become too lazy to do so,

    I assume you will make the same type of complain for the lack of supply of iPhone or iPAD

    1. Mark_X

      Blanket attacks on all Chinese and all Chinese companies are stupid


      No, I think the article is fine. But some of the comments here are crazy, just as I expected.

      Blanket attacks on all Chinese and all Chinese companies are stupid.

      For example, as far as I know, both Huawei and ZTE have passed their source codes to the Indian government earlier this year. Clearly, if their technology was based on stolen technology as described by the previous poster, they would have to be EXTREMELY brave to show their code!

    2. Grass Mud Horse

      another article from the east

      without the proper use of plural 's' and other telltale signs of the wu mao writers brigade. Why the penguin?

      1. Little Poppet

        Another article from the east, AND?... lol

        "without the proper use of plural 's' and other telltale signs of the wu mao writers brigade. Why the penguin?"

        Your response makes no sense! Are you suggesting that because the writer may have originated from the east and the fact that his or her POV is the opposite to yours, this somehow suggests that their response is less relevant or should be discounted?

        Next time, try and bag the unsubstantiated smugness and arrogance - contrary to your beliefs, you ain't so special! ;-)

  25. lighting EVER
    Dead Vulture

    A thief to catch a thief shout

    the truth is that there is 30% percents of these mineral products of the world comes from the US ,why not to get it ?all known that us have more improvment technology which is more friendly to earth ? but presidents decided to let china do it ,and do more harm to chinese .

    so great us presidents !

    1. Anonymous Coward

      I am confused.

      US presidents? What do they have to do with it?

      You mean states should decide such things as what is an appropriate industry to develop? Crazy talk!

      You myst be a c........ or a s......... or something. I can't even print these words as they are so evil.

      For your govern, please know that the the Markets (uppercase here obviously, the Market is the new deity as it is omniscient) always makes the best decisions. Look at how good the free-Markets economies are faring against the useless, inefficient, state-controlled, c........ (oh no that word again) and therefore fatally flawed China. The west's profit-driven banking system rules. The west's energy-intensive processes are the future. The west's medical prowess gives its population the best access to care. Etc etc

      You don't want states (lowercase here obviously, governements are useless spenders and regulators and nothing more than an impediment to the Market) to get involved in what is not a core service*, do you? Quaterly results are what matters most, stockholders are also what matters most, etc etc.

      * What is that btw? Xe does fantastic job for defense, Security companies should police us, education and health are obviously better dispensed when run for a profit. Imho, the govt should be a few hundreds people elected very so often and that's it. All the rest should be contracted out, and we'll get much better service with much lower taxes. Ha!

      I, for one, welcome even more powerful Market-driven Overlords.

  26. David 141
    Big Brother

    I pity the human race

    FFS people, all someone has to do is raise the specter of "foreign control" and you start foaming at the jaws like a pack of trained hounds.

    A return to mercantilism? Seriously? A policy design by merchants and ruling elites, and designed to benefit the rich and powerful? From an era where the monopoly was considered a good thing? Where the "good of the nation" was put before the good of the people in it?

    Why not return to full blown imperialist nationalism as well?

    Do you want to feel a boot stomping on your face for eternity? Go ahead and hand over power to the monopolists and demagogues.

    1. Anonymous Coward

      @David 141: And The Alternative Is ?

      I know all the arguments against the state meddling with the economy and the Soviet Union and the *former* Chinese System demonstrated it does not work if applied in a stupid, extremist fashion.

      On the other hand, does the current Anglosaxon System (for the lack of a better term) work ?

      It seems to me that the French System of free-enterprise mixed with heavy state intervention from time to time works much, much better.

      To paraphrase Mr Churchill "French Economics is the Worst Economics of the Free World, except for all others".

      Now you can go hair-splitting over Germany, Netherlands and the Scandinavians, but what you will find is that they pursue similar policies like the Ecole Nationale Elite.

      Certainly we do not want stupid, orthodox mercantilism, but with the Chinese government cornering critical markets, we have to do something. And the other "modern mercantilism" like Ariane, Airbus, Dassault Systemes, VW, works excellently, by the way.

  27. JaitcH

    It's called 'Added Value' - done everywhere for everything

    Instead of simply digging up the stuff, China opted to Add Value to their RE exports, a process that is done by many countries, as it increases the worth of the export.

    If you want to complain to anyone, try the U.S. Government and GM Motors, the sleepy government that let the deal go through and the vendor of the US RE operation the Chinese bought, respectively.

    The Chinese plan ahead, the U.S. government clearly doesn't.

    1. Tempest

      The Saudi's are withholding oil if you consider that ...

      building their own refinery, which is what the Chinese did, is blocking sales, then you are right.

      Canada did this, too!

  28. Anonymous Coward

    Nasty Evil Chinese!

    You just can't trust those little buggers can you?

    You stop raping their country for a couple of decades and the repay you by creating a monopoly in material commodities crucial to the Modern Western World.

    WHo DO THEy ThiNK THEy ARE????slash??//????



  29. darkforest
    Thumb Up

    All your rare earth are belong to us!

    If a country sold diamond for the price of glass due to decades of mismanagement and illegal smuggling, is it a wonder they are cutting back?

    Substitute diamond for rare earth, then it's funny that after exploiting this for decades most of the posters demand they continue to sell us for pennies. We are outraged that the said country dares to regulate their resources and take green steps to reduce the associated environmental destruction.

    For the 'China's out to steal our jobs' crowd, now our once mighty (and ample) domestic rare earth industry's resurgent demand for miners, managers, scientists must be a wet dream that kicks China's behind?

    Or do you insist them selling diamond for the price of glass? And destroy more of their environment while they are at it?

  30. Tim Worstal

    Oh, we can

    "WHY can't we centrifuge them like we do UF6? Centrifuging is pretty good at separating stuff with different masses, isn't it?"

    We could certainly do that. It's just that that is a very expensive method of doing so. Huge energy requirements.

    The straight Kroll Process (as we use it to make TiO2 out of ilmenite and rutile) costs $200 or so a tonne material produced (ish, ish, the ilmenite is just under $100 a tonne, the TiO2 comes out at about $450) which is much closer to the sort of costs we'd be happy to pay to separate rare earths.

  31. Anonymous Coward

    @Why oh why

    "Why oh why do our politicians let this greedy thieving country rob us blind left and right? "

    Because it's world war 3 on the quiet, which (ex-?)communist China quietly won a few years ago and consequently now owns much of the US and supplies much of the US's raw materials and manufactured goods, but the greedy western capitalists (primarily US/UK) and their stooges in government intend to continue enjoying their profits and exploiting their remaining local workers as much as they can for as long as they can?

    Otherwise you'd have to think about the US and UK reining back the scum in the "financial services" sector (those whose globalisation services have financed WW3), and about putting less excessive folks in charge in the remaining commanding heights of the economy and letting the workers have a fairer share of the deal (German style), and that's not acceptable to those currently in power in the USA and UK.

  32. Peter Dawe

    Blame our politicians

    Our politicians are meant to keep us safe. Security of resources ( Energy, food, minerals etc) are part of that security. Why are we not holding them to account? There are significant deposits elsewhere. Let not blame the Chinese politicians for looking after their population, when our politicians fail us!

    The Oregon survivalists have a point!

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Keep us safe?

      Even at the best of times, our elected representatives ought to do what we elected them to do, which is to represent us, looking after our interests. That is a completely different thing from "keep us safe".

      I agree that they tried to do the latter, possibly because the former would interfere with greed and graft and whatever else they're up to in those dark back rooms, which has resulted in some impressively expensive* but provably innefectual security circus. Are you saying you want more of that?

      * In more senses than merely money.

    2. gratou


      I am missing something?

      You want greater govt intervention, and at the same time condone survivalists, who would like as little govt intervention as possible?

  33. Anonymous Coward

    Forgive & forget?

    Yes, this RE strategy is all well & good and, of course, we should grow up already and recycle more and be more efficient with raw materials...but I'm just wondering: did you really believe that the Chinese wouldn't remember anything about the 1st & 2nd Opium Wars or even more recently, forget that we fueled and supported their civil war that finally ended in 1949, with the losers stuck on an island now called Taiwan?

    I mean, seriously.

    (Yes, I know..."SORRY, we didn't mean it back then"...OR...everybody was doing it back then...OR...if we didn't do it, someone else would've...OR...)

  34. Is it me?

    It's not just Rare Earths

    If you look at a wide range of materials and Products in the UK and other Markets you'll find that China has a monopoly on supply, in fact, as we know in the computer industry, regardless of the badge on the front of the computer, it will have come out of the same manufacturer in China, thus the only competitive edge companies have is on volume, and distribution.

    Our continual obsession with lowering or minimising the cost of a product, means that the producers will always go to the cheapest source of supply for any service they want, regardless of their competitors also using that source, because if their competitor is cheaper, they will loose market share, and go out of business.

    Ultimately, all you land up buying, is a brand, the product may well be identical to another brand in all but appearance, thus all that is significant is the brand marketing.

    You can't even use price as a differentiator, as Apple prove, you minimise your costs, and maximise your price against what the market will bare.

    Politicians, only see brand competition, not supply chain competition, and how would you legislate for that anyway.

    A sane company would ensure full diversity of supply, but will still be driven by what there competitors do, and if diversity is too expensive they won't do it, because they will be driven out by lower cost suppliers.

    our only reasonable salvation at present is the cost of transporting products from A to B, as energy costs rise, that will increase, moving production closer to home, maybe.

    Oh the other thing is that you have to convince banks to invest in manufacturing, high capital cost, long payback period, hmm don't think so.

  35. Anonymous Coward

    "all you land up buying, is a brand"

    Spot on.

    Actually brands and their promoters are in a big way responsible for the decline in "Western" (ie US/UK) civilisation in recent decades. All the corporates are driven by "brand value", all the high streets sell the same brands from the same branded shops, all the TV comes from the same branded production companies... (and then there's branded IT).

    Now look at a western country where "brand value" (as proclaimed by City spivs) hasn't taken over from reality (France, Germany, etc) and tell me which one is in with a better chance of surviving the next five-fifty years.

  36. Anonymous Coward

    Is it only me

    or is this the Russian Gas, chinese coal again....the only thing they dont stop the free flow of is their criminals posing as migrants

  37. kaz 2

    There is one large RE producer in EU- Silmet in Estonia

    They claim to be biggest independent producer outside Asia. So and in Estonia there is ore available. But of course nobody wants these old production methods to expand.

  38. Kaleberg

    good old days

    Apropos this rare earths embargo I took out my vintage guide to rare earth processing, vintage 1960s. Your electrolytic process seems to have been standard practice back then with a chemical approach to concentrating the metal followed by blasting electrons through it. Some of those rigs looked pretty nasty, but they worked. I'm not sure how many jobs would be created since electrons tend to flow pretty nicely by themselves, but surely more than just offloading the stuff from China.

    There's a lot we can learn from the good old days. I'm from the US, and we were doing industrial policy when we were still a colony. (I think British industrial policy was one cause of the friction.) Industrial policy worked then. The Chinese have shown us it works now.

This topic is closed for new posts.