blink
While I appreciate that beauty is strictly in the eye of the beholder, "hedge fund hottie" seems not just crass, but inaccurate...
http://wwwcache.localtechwire.com/asset/opinion/2009/10/22/6258694/danielle_chiesi-512x346.jpg
Robert Moffat, once tipped for the top job at IBM, has blamed his mistress for encouraging him to give her information which she used for insider dealing. He is facing securities fraud and conspiracy charges, and prosecutors are asking for a six month prison sentence. But Moffat's lawyers, speaking in mitigation, said …
"In a letter to the court Moffat said his crimes were not "driven by greed or the desire to profit", but that he wanted to "appear important and knowledgeable to show Ms. Chiesi that I was 'in the know' about important matters", AP reports."
Hmmm.
Ok so when you pay cash for sex, its prostitution, right? But what happens when you trade knowledge for sex?
C'mon. Moffat was an IBM exec. Their ego's are much larger than their penis. How do you not know that you're getting played? The simple truth is that at best, he knew he was getting played but didn't care. At worst... he's smarter than you think and he's got an offshore account with his profits stashed and its under the radar. (An IBM exec at his level is a global exec. He'd have plenty of options of when and how to stash the cash.)
Paris because she's known for her 'pillow talk'.
"People who engage in insider trading are usually motivated by greed and power. Danielle Chiesi was motivated by sexual gratification, according to a story in Fortune this month" ..
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/07/danielle_chiesi_loves_sex_stoc.html
Now all we need is a transsexual subplot ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_Sexy_Money