
IT Angle?! :)
not even the slightest bit of pretence about an it angle here.. still you know your readers.. probably a bit too well i fear.. hmmm
The 66-year-old man who in April pleaded guilty in Leicester Crown Court to charges of "buggery of a donkey between February 2 and February 5, 1999, and buggery of a horse between March 15 and 18, 2004", has been jailed for 22 months. Joseph Squires - of "no stable address" - also admitted two charges of damaging property, " …
This post has been deleted by its author
"of "no stable address"
--Checks the calendar, "nope not Friday."
You owe me a keyboard Lester, if it was Friday I would forgive you
And I have two questions about this part of the article:
"buggery of a donkey between February 2 and February 5, 1999, and buggery of a horse between March 15 and 18, 2004"
(Yes I know that videos/pictures probably existed here but.......) How did they dine uot about the two 'incidents' here? Did the donkey and the horse find out about each other and conspire to inform the authorities about the bad touching?
And secondly how the hell do you find these types of articles Lester? On a regular basis no less. Off for a brew later.
Did a neighbor ("neigh"-bor, ha ha) happen by and capture some cellphone video/ camera evidence? Did the perp fess up? Did unusual lesions in the perp's nether regions cause his doctor to drop a dime on him? Did the donkey get jealous when the perp started carrying on with the horse and arrange for some belated payback (revenge being a dish best served cold)? This is more puzzling than the acts themselves.
Only just come across this as it did not appear on the front page with all the rest of the news....
I know the story from the Guardian was fairly brief, but I would be interested to know if he was ordered to enroll on the sex offenders register. As I want to compare the punishment for this case to the punishment in the case of the guy who plead to extreme p0rn for having a clip of something this guy was really doing. Will be p1ssed if the guy who watched a clip has to enroll where as the guy who commited the actual act does not.