
I just want to know...
What that bloke's eyes are looking at.
DreamWorks and Paramount big-wigs are none too happy with a fashion shoot in men's mag VMan, featuring characters from the Shrek movie franchise cavorting with scantily-clad models. The studio powers that be gave VMan the green light for the spread, apparently hoping for some top exposure before the imminent release of Shrek: …
There's nothing particularly risqué about any of those pictures. Seriously, compared to some of the stuff I've been tricked into looking at on the internet, that's nothing. If they'd put Rick Astley in the pictures, I'd be offended...
Anyway, how does that old adage go, 'All publicity is good publicity.' I strongly suspect that they had full knowledge of how the Shrek images would be used and the whole thing is a PR stunt.
Studio execs complaining that poorly merged images shown in mismatched conextexts in publicity stunt that they agreed to somehow demeans their IP? The worst I can see is that the sexy lingere models seem very out of place with the animated donkey. It's kind of like seeing the teletubbies in a Mercedes commercial.
Its not great marketing, in that I am not sure how many fashion mag readers are going to run out to see Shrek: Happily Ever After, or how many Shrek fans are going to run out to buy the fashion mag. However, other than that, its pretty innocuous.
Paris, because we'd all like to see her in that black bustiere....
1. Shouldn't this count as kiddie pr0n? The male on the right of the picture has no visible body hair, such as males of European descent commonly grow by age 14 or so. Lads that age should be watching Shrek, but not with the lingerie models thrown in.
2. The lampblack on the woman's eyes suggests that the carbon footprint of the shoot is about equivalent to an LA-to-Copenhagen flight.