Windows 7 was their idea
Let's face it they're just Apple haters...
If you're planning a visit to Israel, don't bring along your new iPad - the Israeli government will confiscate it at entry. So says a report in Wednesday's Haaretz, a leading Israeli news service based in Tel Aviv. According to the report, the problem is the iPad's Wi-Fi implementation - and, no, it's not because the iPad's …
This post has been deleted by its author
Most countries require equipment which includes any RF transmitting elements to comply with local regulations and this is typically demonstrated by the presence of sticker indicating the relevant compliance: CE, FCC, etc.
Many countries don't check equipment carried by individual travellers but the Israelis may have taken the view that as they are new and sought after, iPads without the necessary channel or power constraints and corresponding approval are likely to be sold for use if allowed into the country.
Perhaps Apple's decision to restrict iPad sales to the USA for the time being relates to issues with compliance in other markets.
Back in the Eighties, a colleague had to go to Poland. He made the mistake of travelling in his Levis 501s with a spare pair in his bag. At the Polish equivalent of Customs he was stopped and told both pairs were going to be confiscated, leaving him trouserless in a very cold Warsaw winter! It turned out that Levis did not have an official import licence to Poland and 501 smuggling was big business amongst the fashion-hungry Polish youth. Anyone bringing more than a single pair into the country was assumed to be a smuggler, and it was lucky my colleague was not arrested and deported on the spot.
In this case we're talking about the import of electronic goods which are subject to local type approval before they can be sold. I'm not quite sure what would happen with iPads owned by foreigners, presumably they can just be asked not to enable WiFi, or they get confiscated until they leave again.
Anyway, they're welcome to them. If I'm going to buy anything more Apple it'll be one of their new notebooks. I prefer a proper keyboard, and 8 hours of battery life is an 8 fold improvement on the Sony VGN-SZ I have which seems to blow most of the battery in an hour, judging by the noise mainly on making the fan run as fast as possible.. And, of course, much less concern about malware, and .. Enfin, you get the picture :-).
However, I guess I better wait with going to Israel with that too. Not that I plan to go there, but just in case :-)
"So to extend the Israelis' reasoning, does this mean that anyone who takes their WiFi equipped mobile, laptop, etc. with them when they fly to Tel Aviv from North America can expect to have that confiscated too? I think not."
I think not, too.
Just the devices who's manufacturers' haven't bothered to get approval for their devices to work in that state.
The output power is a red herring - what really counts is the bit of government paper that say its OK to use it.
... now they take your passport, *and* your smartphone/PDA.
Next thing you know you're a murder suspect in Dubai, and someone with a dodgy grasp of English has emailed your mum at 3am to wish her a happy wedding anniversary (for plausible deniability reasons).
Hey look what I found in this coat. A national ID card and a driving licence too.
This post has been deleted by its author
A similar "doesn't meet the rules" problem was encountered in some Canadian parks that wanted to use electric vehicles. A good idea right? Quiet, clean, and in keeping with the preservation spirit of the parks themselves. The ministry of transportation pulled the plug on the vehicles because they could do no more than 40 Km/h and the roads in the parks fall under the highway traffic act, which (among other things) requires that vehicles be capable of more than 40Km/h. This all sounds reasonable until you learn that the maximum speed limit in the parks is... (drum roll please)... 40 Km/h.
I think you made a error there. In america they allow higher transmit power on wifi.
There's no reguired minimum transmit power on devices, they regulate the maximum.
They could also be confiscated for allowing the use of unallowed frequency range channels. In http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WLAN_channels there's a list of frequencies allowed for wifi in 5GHz band. You will notice that the frequencies for israel and usa dont match.
My guess is that the reason for confiscation isn't power levels but illegal frequencies.
When a product is launched in a country its because it has been approved for that country and in that it means tested to the standard the country has. So for Israel to conviscate these devices that have not been officialy released in the country and as such not tested is a fair enough argument period.
Seriously it realy is that simple and lets face its a device that has electronic communications capabilities -- that in itself makes there actions a no brainer.
The author has bolloxed this up spectacularly.
FCC max EIRP is 3.98W for point to multipoint in both the 2GHz and 5GHz bands. Most devices don't put out anything like this even with a good antenna but the point is that they are LEGALLY permitted to.
EU (except France) max EIRP is 100mW for point to multipoint in the 2GHz bands - max EIRP is from 200mW to 2W in the 5GHz bands.
Epic fail. Really very funny indeed.
EU will cap the device, whereas US cap the power, the EU thing is simple because if you have a 100mW card, that's your limit (most are around 30mW in the EU), it doesn't matter in the EU if you slap a directional antenna on, change the beam width to 10 degrees and you have more "power", in the US however it's the combination of device and antenna, a powerful device with a low gain antenna is probably OK, but stick a 10 degree antenna on a high power device and you have a problem, it's very difficult to break the law in the UK (unless you buy your devices abroad, like the ubiquity 300mW pcmcia card, stick a 12dB directional antenna and you'll see for half a mile), in the US you have to get the calculators out (or a detector) to see if you're breaking the law.
The U.S. allows higher Wi-Fi powers than Europe, not lower. You can transmit up to 1W, compared to 100mW in most of Europe (France excepted). However, that's probaly a red herring.
All of Europe and many other countries require any new wireless transmitting device that works at greater than 10mW to be registered before it can be shipped. In Europe that's through the R&TTE approval process. It's generally a paperwork exercise, but it takes three months. That's something most manufacturers understand and incorproate into their product release plans. If Apple hasn't done it, it's either because it's forgotten, or not actually believed that anyone would consider the iPad worth carryign around with them.
I hate Apple as much as the next guy, but less channels, less power - where's the problem?
All it means is apple devices may ocassionally lose out because they can't tune to the right channel or maybe they have slightly less range, possibly if you ignore the fact that EU wifi environments are technically more noisy...
I can understand the Isreali government banning it from their own purchasing, but people just bringing them in for their own use, especially as travellers?
Also this should apply to any device with WiFi comming from the US - it should be a clear policy, all smartphones from the US are banned because they're pretty much all wifi, laptops? forget it! and so on...
It actually doesn't make much sense, and you'd expect to see it for a European (or japanese for that matter) traveller to the US more than vice-versa, but that never happens.
You're a border control person. You've got no (or minimal) technical knowledge at all.
Someone walks up to you with an electronic device and asks to pass through.
The device has no valid type approval in your country.
Do you :
A - take it away (e.g. do your job)
B - let them in with it (e.g. With no technical knowledge, you are better at deciding what should be approved than your governments official approval body)
Common sense arguments about power levels and channels don't apply here, it's the law, if you start arguing about technical details etc,. Next thing, some bloke walks up with some random bit of kit and says "yes it's got less power than your legal limit etc..." and before you know it you'll find you've let something in the breaks all sorts of other rules that you are unaware of and causes havoc.
I'll bet the americans aren't generally happy about allowing electronics without FCC approval to be taken into their country but get so many going through the borders it would be impossible to administer.
"Many countries don't check equipment carried by individual travellers but the Israelis may have taken the view that as they are new and sought after......" Or alternatively since they are new and sought after the Israeli security guards have decided it would look nice sitting on their coffee tables and so decided to actually enforce a rule that they normally ignore.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020