Genius...
Falling Water had structural issues as well didn't it?
Fans of Blade Runner with very, very deep pockets are directed to Frank Lloyd Wright's 1924 Ennis House, which featured in the movie and is up for grabs for a modest $15m. The Ennis House. Pic: The Ennis House Foundation The last of the architect's four "Textile Block" abodes, the 6,000-square-foot Mayan-inspired pad was …
"Falling Water had structural issues as well didn't it?"
Yes, but that is not the architect's fault. It is never the architect's fault. It is the fault of philistine builders, who use imperfect material and techniques; and ignorant occupiers who fail to understand the special maintenance requirements of such wonderful designs.
'Falling Water had structural issues as well didn't it?'
Yup, some of the reinforcement was left out of the concrete cantilevers and they became deformed. It was also unbelievably noisy until double-glazed. FLW - awesome architect, but never buy a flat roof from him.
Oh and the mighty Reg left out 'The Rocketeer' from the house's list of guest appearances.
Now if only I had a spare $15m lying around.
There's a FLW home (the May house) in my home town (city). Way ahead of its time and wonderful to look at, but structurally not up to par. After much reinforcing and restoration it is a joy to tour the home. Many times genious' aren't bothered by the details (like structural engineering), unfortunately.
Paris, 'cause she's better looking than the other icons.
Wikipedia claims a structural engineering consultants report was buried in the walls, I'd love it to be true but that sounds extreme even for Lloyd Wright.
A triumph of form over function. I actually really like Falling Water (actually most of his output) but I wouldn't want to own any of it.
I hope your comment is sarcastic. My father worked in the construction industry for forty years, and had nothing good to say about architects. The civil engineers did the real work, taking totally impractical sketches from architects and trying to make them buildable. It's an interesting comparison to software engineering, where managers make the same kind of impractical design decisions that should be left to qualified system architects.
I recently read[1] that FLW made the mistake of telling his client that he had the design for Falling Water "done" -- as in, he'd thought it all through and was satisfied that it would all work together. The client assumed that "done" meant "ready to go" and told Wright that he was in Milwaukee on business and would drive over to Wright's Oak Park home and pick up the drawings. So FLW had to whip up a set of design (if not actual construction) blueprints in about three hours. Which would go a ways towards explaining why the actual engineering details were a bit...sparse.
[1] _Frank Lloyd Wright Revealed_, IIRC
I have to see this building everyday at work:
http://www.empsfm.org/aboutEMPSFM/index.asp?categoryID=157
At least they are putting alll the atrocities to good desgn in one place... Next to the 'Space needle' and serviced by the Seattle MonoFail...
I just wish Paul Allen had more sense than to sign off on this expense.
then it deserves to crumble.
We're talking about a construction that is less than 50 years old, right ? It's not a medieval castle, or some architectural wonder of the first millennium that deserves millions to be spend on its restoration and maintenance.
This is a building that was conceived and built with modern techniques, modern tools and modern materials. If it can't stand alone for a hundred years without continuous and expensive treatment, then it should most definitely die.
A tribute website can be made, with lots of pics and, at some point, a 3-D tour. That will be more than this thing deserves anyway.
... are hopeless engineers. Visit the Gaudi apartment buildings in Barcelona sometime to see a beautiful /and/ functional building thats still a joy to live in 100 years later.
I quite agree however with the comment about it being pretty shabby that a less-than-50-years-old building made with modern techniques takes more looking after than a 1000 year old castle. But then FLW was an artist, not a practical person.
Tis a thing of beauty that brings much pain...
I too live down the street from a FLW house. Most everyone who lived there over the last 50+ years has complained bitterly about the maintenance, the cold, the dampness, the roof leaks, etc, etc. A few years ago it was re-hab'd, again, and sold for housing bubble big $$. As a result, the property taxes in the neighborhood skyrocketed (most of the houses in said neighborhood were old and very modest), thus spreading the misery...