Whale-Shit for Mr. Rogers?
> If you're a scrote and government legalises drugs, where do you get your drugs? The shop. How do you pay for your drugs? You mug old ladies, because THAT'S ALL THEY KNOW.
This sentence you have written - I do not think it means what you think it means. According to you old ladies only know about getting mugged. That's a bit ageist isn't it?
> What the hell would change? A criminal is a criminal is a criminal.
Which is why the recipients of the 41,000,0000 speeding tickets issued per year are all criminals and are therefore tempted to mug old ladies, riot in the street and screw goats in church. These criminals, they're all the same.
> At least with drugs illegal, I've a fair chance of getting my kids through adolecence and becoming decent strongly moralled human beings without them partaking in such a dangerous and anti-social past time.
And when they're out of your sight they'll go completely off the rails because Daddy is no longer there to police them. Don't bother to try and give them any ideas about thinking for themselves or making their own decisions - Daddy will do it all for them like the fucked-up control-freak he is.
> If it's everywhere and there's no resistence what really is to stop them?
That sense of being 'strongly moralled' you were bleating about a moment ago. It's the same thing that prevents everyone getting pissed on alcohol all the time (alcohol being everywhere and legal, to boot).
> The main issue is the addictiveness of these drugs,
Which drugs would 'these' drugs be, then? Opiates? Barbiturates? Psychedelics? Uppers? Downers? Cake (that's a made-up drug in case you didn't know)?
> if they're legal then they'll be easier to get hold of
Just like tobacco is very easy to get hold of without proof of age (unless you're saying that you're the kind of parent who'd offer their children a puff on a cigarette and that this kind of behaviour is likely to increase if classified substances are declassified)?
> and mine and your kids will have a much greater chance of getting involved, hooked and ultimately end up screwing up their lives and all because some idiot takes offence at the general population despising them funding all manner of other criminal activities.
That's 'some idiots' because there's more than one person who's arguing this point of view.
If that's the level of the debate we're going to have well fine, but it might be better if you took the beam out of your own eye first, idiot-boy.
> If there was no demand there'd be no supply.
Stop me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe there's any demand for whale-shit.
> It's the numpties who create the demand that we should be working on, not trying to drum manufacturers and dealers out of business.
OK. Make sure you don't have a glass of that nasty alcoholic wine with your meal then, and no puffing on a nice cigar at Christmas. Only straight-laced Puritan living for you, you uncomprehending and incomprehensible twat.