back to article Super Micro squeezes four servers into one chassis

Super Micro Computer will soon push the envelope on server density. In early mach, at the CeBIT 2009 trade show in Hannover, Germany. In early March, the whitebox server and motherboard maker will delivers a new four-in-one server dubbed the Twin2. The Twin2 servers will pack four half-width motherboards inside a 2U server …


This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. Gabriel Vistica


    Hot-swappable motherboards!

  2. James

    Originally an OSS designed product..

    This new Supermicro server looks very similar to a project that Open Source Systems (originally Open Source Storage) was working on before they went under. It was a brilliant idea, and I'm glad to see that someone was able to take their design mainstream (Somewhat). It looks like the team at OSS was ahead of their time. I know their product management team was very sharp and forward thinking (My friend Calvin worked there at the time). Of course 2+ years ago, there were no "Twin" style half width boards, so the most they could do was 2 full size motherboards in a 2U. But all of the other benefits of this system were present in the original OSS design. Dell also took the same idea for use by there Data Center Services group..Take a look at the link to the original design below, and then visit and type "Open Source Systems" in the search bar to see the originators of this design. (Eren Niazi, Ivan Secoquian, Brian Rodriguez, Mark Rotzow, Jared Giles, etc.)

    Original OSS Design:

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward


    "In early mach" - they may be fast, but not fast enuf.....

  4. Nicholas Ettel

    Where have all the editors gone?

    Mr. Morgan, your editor has failed you miserably. Please see the first two paragraphs of your article for details.

  5. Ian Rogers

    Quacks like a duck...

    So, despite being "not a blade server" this is a blade server with the blades mounted horizontally...

  6. Tom Womack

    what's a factor 1000 between friends?

    for 'gigaflop' read 'megaflop' throughout

  7. Anonymous Coward

    nothing new or special

    1U 19" Rackmount with 4 servers:

  8. Tim99 Silver badge

    Save the planet?

    Alternatively - Windows users - Save space, energy and staff by putting *NIX on more of your servers. Typically you can serve 2-4+ times more users with *NIX than Windows...

  9. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Familiar drives...

    Little purple release tabs on the drives? Check

    Hints at something similar being released by HP? Check

    Wonder if HP are rebadging it?

  10. Anton Ivanov

    lex has been doing this for ages

    Similar designs using mini itx orm factors have been around for ages.Lex, travla, etc

  11. Andy

    yes but...

    will it blend?

    play crysis at more than 2fps?

    play raytraced quake3?

    is it able to run a single outlook mailbox restore over mapi at more than 200kB/s?

    sorry, just getting it out the system...

  12. Mike Tree
    Paris Hilton

    is 4in2 better than 2in1?

    I have one of their 2in1 servers. Not a bad bit of kit, but I fail to see how a 4in2u server is an improvement over 2 x 2in1u servers.

    Paris, cos I'm baffled too!

  13. Matt Bryant Silver badge

    Not just for high performance boffins

    Looks like a winner for those remote office setups. Up to four powerful servers in one chassis, powerful enough to run local email and database, possibly other servers virtualised, inside 2U. Should make an interesting option to having to put in a half-loaded blades chassis or several 1U rack servers.

    Have to correct one misconception on blades switches, though. They can replace external rack switches as they have external ports available for other non-blade devices, or the blade chassis can use pass-through modules to connect to existing rack switches. So the idea that blades somehow ties you to having to have rack and blade switches is incorrect.

  14. foo_bar_baz


    Exactly my thoughts. It's almost there, just without switch- or management modules. If the disks were on a shared bus with controllers that supported concurrent access it would make a sweet cluster in a 2U format.

  15. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    @nothing special

    lolol, you're kidding right? This is so far ahead of 4 crap mini-itx motherboards with VIA C7 on them bolted down inside a 1U case that's it's unreal. Just one Dual Core CPU is going to pee all over the 4 VIA C7, not to mention the ease of which a dead motherboard can be swapped out. You're having a laugh I'm afraid.

  16. Mike Tree


    "it would make a sweet cluster in a 2U format."

    until the shared PSU packs up!

  17. Anonymous Coward
    Thumb Up

    @Mike Tree

    AFAIK it's N+1 on the PSU with Hotswap.

  18. James

    Remember - All of this was an OSS design...

    OSS was ahead of their time with just a fraction of R&D that the larger companies could put into it. OSS and their development team are wholeheartedly responsible for this design. They couldn't help it if Supermicro or Dell stole the idea, but please give the OSS team the props they deserve!

    Eren Niazi, Ivan Secoquian, Brian Rogriguez, Jared GIles, Mark Rotzow, etc. They were the real ones behind the design.They were also the first company to include high efficiency power supplies, that were eventually adopted by Supermicro (Coldwatt) fot this design. Funny how people try to take credit for what others have done. The valley is a very unique place in that they will lie, cheat and steal in order to get what they want. Pathetic yes, but standard. Most people should feel a sort of moral wrong doing, but honestly, they are so far detached from being respectable people, that they do not care.

    Original OSS Design:

  19. noodle heimer

    Supermicro: cheap, thinly certified, sloppy QA

    Let us know when a vendor that's capable of doing QA and willing to pay the fees to have their gear certified releases something like this. Until then, this is a giant step down in the being-able-to-sleep-nights sweepstakes.

  20. Anonymous Coward
    Paris Hilton

    Hot swappable motherboards - my arse...

    Hot swappable as in - while 3 servers run, you can change the motherboard in the fourth,

    Not hot swappable like disks, as in - each server has a N+1 motherboard redundancy, such that should a motherboard die, the hot spare can be invoked and the failed motherboard can be swapped out.

    Furthermore, I fail to see why this is a selling point, other than to state that there are four independent motherboards in the chassis instead of 4 integrated on one, which would be asinine.

    The most popular failures of cmponents on servers are disks and power supplies. Third - way down the list - comes memory DIMMS. Motherboards come 4th - they tend to fail relatively rarely, unless insufficiently cooled.

    Paris, because she is insufficiently cool.

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like