Ah-ha!
> The ECJ has followed the main arguments of its Advocate General, Yves Bot, ...
You made that up, didn't you.
The European Union's Data Retention Directive has a sound legal basis because it connects to policing but does not actually cover policing functions, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has said. Ireland and Slovakia had objected to the Directive, which orders countries to pass laws requiring telecoms companies to retain phone …
Since the ECJ now in effect has stated on a legal paper, that the reason behind violating UN's Declaration of Human Rights, is economic (thus they say that human rights take the rear seat to economic reasons), shouldn't this open the door for filing a complaint against the EU as an organization with the international human rights court?