back to article Blizzard of smut cuts off Council websites

If you’re seeking smut, you only need go as far at present as the leafy green home pages of West Wittering Parish Council. Or there's Worcestershire County Council’s Healthy Schools Forum which, in an area dedicated to "internet safety", advises visitors on where to find "sexy escorts", before inviting them into a chat room to …


This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. Dave_H

    No-one in the IT department has noticed

    Surely the boss has noticed the long hours the helpdesk are 'suddenly pulling' and the lack of paper tissues in the office!

  2. TeeCee Gold badge

    Sheltering behind a URL.

    Exactly what makes this "safer"? Is it that the various bots 'n such that generate the link stats are less likely to write off results from such an address? Or is it just that the site's far more likely to adminstered by an incompetant, time-serving dweeb so the lavish plastering of hot pr0n links is less likely to be detected?

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Should we be surprised?

    So public bodies are operating forums yet don't know about spambots or moderation? Also they don't bother to regularly read their own forums?

    Yes, that is about the level of skill I'd expect from them. So much for the lip-service of being "engaged with the customer."

  4. Ian Ferguson

    Virus and Porn Researcher

    That sounds like 50% of my perfect job.

  5. Martin Gregorie

    So what's new

    Last year I found the same had happened to an aviation-related online magazine. Possibly co-incidentally, this happened during a change of editor.

    I e-mailed them about the problem, never got a response. After a month or so nothing had changed in the forum^W pron listing though new material had started to appear on the front page.

    I scrapped my reference to them at that point, so now I neither know nor care what they've done about it.

  6. Paul

    extreme images?

    Does this mean that, under new laws governing extreme images, poor West Wittering council could be guilty of hosting, and therefore possessing, images too extreme for the sexual imagination of Jacqui Smith?

  7. Anonymous Coward

    This article...

    ...saved me hours of googling for prOn.

    Yep, I'm going. It's the one with the right cuff rolled up.

  8. Richard Porter
    IT Angle

    Why take the site down?

    One of my sites got hacked a while ago. I just deleted the files that shouldn't have been there, replaced any others that had been updated at the same time and changed the password. It has been OK since then.

    The problem with these organisations is that they're not exactly "with it" as regards the web but they think they ought to have a site and get someone else to 'do it'. After that box has been ticked they forget all about it.

  9. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Don't diss West Wittering

    Best surf in the south. Not that that's saying much.

  10. Anonymous Coward
    Paris Hilton


    A humorous way to highlight the idiocies of the dogma spilling out of Downing Street every five minutes, as well as the complete failure of those empowered to tell the rest of us how to behave, to police themselves. Gotta love 'teh interwebz', eh?

    Paris - because she knows better than any, that nobody is perfect (not even her).

  11. RW
    Paris Hilton

    @ Paul

    "the sexual imagination of Jacqui Smith"

    "Repressions", "fears", "neurosis", or "complexes" would be a more suitable word.

    Paris, because we don't have a Jacqui icon. Please may we have a Jacqui icon? Pretty please? Pretty please with cream and sugar on it?

  12. Les Matthew
    Thumb Up

    Re: Don't diss West Wittering

    "Best surf in the south."

    In more ways than one now, it appears.

  13. Tony


    Please can I request that the terms 'sexual imagination' and 'Jacqui Smith' are never put into the same sentence again.

  14. Anonymous Coward

    Salford Speaks

    She's hot..

  15. Rob Beard

    Re: Salford Speaks

    Who Jacqui Smith? :-o


  16. Anonymous Coward

    Salford Bokes

    She's not....

  17. mh.

    Forum Spam

    Probably about the only that stands out about this is that it has a address. A lot of forum admin consists of chucking out spam registrations where the spammer wants to post links to sites full of fake drugs, counterfeit shoes and pr0n sites that are about as compelling as the Kays catalogue. Most of these registrations are automated using stuff like Xrumer or just doing a Google search for things like inurl:smf or inurl:phpbb. I've seen other forums where there are about 20 legit users and hundreds of spam ones. The only real way with to deal with it is manual account activation and checking if the emails or usernames haven't been used to spamvertise on other forums.

  18. Unlimited

    not just link spam

    Not sure if I've misunderstood, or if some of the commentors have.

    "gain access to their server and set up a directory and chat forum that would be invisible to the public"

    I read this to mean that there wasn't a public forum that got spammed. Server got compromised and a forum installed to be used as a link dump.

  19. Anonymous Coward

    Pictures; We require Pictures

    No pictures....we just don't believe it.

    At least give us the playmobil version.

  20. John Ozimek
    IT Angle

    @not just link spam

    "I read this to mean that there wasn't a public forum that got spammed. Server got compromised and a forum installed to be used as a link dump".

    Absolutely. It is not clear what happened on some of the other sites. Worcestershire seem to run a bona fide forum which just got link spammed. However, West Wittering don't.

    They were thinking of setting up a forum - possibly this will put them off. So in effect, the hack used an exploit to get on to their server and then either installed a forum of its own or activated something that was there but unused.

    If you looked at the site structure (before they took it down) there was very clearly a spurious directory that got added some while after the main site was put up.

    That is one of the reasons for looking at this more closely. Link spam? Not much of an issue. Spam sat on domains may be a bit more, since it implies a lack of moderation on some government sites.

    But exploits that colonise your site from within are something that fewer people are aware of, and also denote an attack that is just that bit higher up the malware food chain. Of course, one solution is to do a regular check of your own site for "+porn"... which will work fine unless you site happens to be a porn site.

    Then you might have problems.

  21. Tim


    Sadly, I can report that the Norfolk County Council website returns nothing interesting for porn and merely a tiny bit of scat. What do we pay our council taxes for?


  22. Anonymous Coward


    Save Our Council Porn

    Action group meets every Tuesday at Wittering Seniors Club - all welcome

    Free tea.

This topic is closed for new posts.