back to article Delta Boeing 777 engine suffers 'uncommanded rollback'

The US's National Transportation Safety Board is probing an "uncommanded rollback" on a Rolls-Royce Trent 895 engine which affected a Delta Air Lines Boeing 777-200ER on 26 November, Flight International reports. NTSB explains that Delta Flight 18, from Shanghai to Atlanta, experienced loss of thrust on the right-hand engine …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    This is the problem with horrendously complicated computer systems

    It only takes one small bug that only occurs when a very rare set of conditions are met in the code and you've got a non repeatable and potentially dangerous incident. No computer code is 100% bug free and the flight systems on a 777 will be no exception. Getting rid of obvious bugs is easy - getting rid of these sorts is damned hard. Also AFAIK Boeing don't use separate systems designed by separate teams so any bug in the code will occur in the backup systems too.

  2. BlueGreen

    plus ca change, and a solution for free

    courtesy of New Scientist Letters

    <http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20026770.200-iced-fuel.html>

    Now we have digital storage we can forget faster and more efficiently (Ok, that was a little cynical).

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Gates Horns

    Source of fuel?

    Seems like the only constant in both flights are that they are flying from Beijing. Maybe the Beijing fuel has more water in it?

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Thumb Up

    Computer glitch

    Always thought the "ice crystals blocking the fuel lines" theory as an explanation for the BA accident was a bit implausible. The idea of a computer glitch sounds far more likely.

  5. Steven Knox
    IT Angle

    "uncommanded rollback"

    Perhaps it found an error in its installation, so couldn't continue?

  6. Gary

    In case anyone is wondering

    This happened about over Wyoming (lat 44.55, long -105.33), when they started the descent from FL390 to FL310.

    http://tinyurl.com/6g9bbq

  7. Anonymous Coward
    Joke

    FDR

    "are now examining the Delta aircraft's flight data recorder"

    Yep, theres a scuff here and a small dent there where someone installed it with a lump hammer.

    No doubt there are some dead thunder-flies in there too, from the summer.

    Oh wait, do you mean they're examining the data stored on said device?

  8. Gary

    @AC

    In the BA report, the findings indicated the the 777's engine control system properly commanded a thrust increase, so if it was a computer glitch, it would have been in the individual engine's computer. Having both engines have the same bug seems just as implausible. The recent cavitation they found in the fuel lines does suggest it could have been ice crystals. Interesting that it happened with the same Rolls-Royce engine model, though.

  9. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    @Source of fuel?

    "Maybe the Beijing fuel has more water in it?"

    Either that or all the melamine resin they added to boost its octane rating melted and clogged the fuel lines with lumps of plastic?

  10. Richard
    Stop

    It's a waste of time posting links

    as noone ever reads them. They'd rather go on spouting their own ill-informed opinions to all and sundry than actually try a bit of research.

    Quote from the AAIB report:

    "...the engine control system detected the reduced fuel flows and commanded the Fuel Metering Valves (FMVs) to open fully. The FMVs responded to this command and opened fully but with no appreciable change in the fuel flow to either engine."

    In other words:

    This was a fuel supply blockage, not a software failure. The FADEC actually sensed the situation and tried to recover it by opening the Fuel Metering Valves fully in order to maintain supply to the engines.

    This can easily be corroborated by the following paragraph, describing the damage caused to one of the fuel pumps by the lack of supply pressure:

    "The HP pump manufacturer conducted tests on a new pump in an attempt to replicate the cavitation marks seen on the accident flight pumps. The test revealed that running the pump with an abnormally low inlet pressure and a restricted fuel flow of 5,000 pph for 60 seconds gave identical cavitation marks to those seen on the pumps removed from G‑YMMM."

    Fuel supply blockage. End of story.

  11. Schultz

    Expensive fuel

    So now they run on water. Smart.

  12. Anonymous Coward
    Alert

    @boltar

    The physical evidence on the prior incident showed fairly conclusively that the problem was ice in the fuel, not a computer or avionics problem. (damage to the fuel pump caused by cavitation, or sucking air was observed)

    I would have thought that a directive to remedy this problem would have been issued by now...

  13. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    software bugs

    I don't know where within the engine system the flight data recorders get their feed of data or signals. But I would have thought they would be recording the actual messages over the databus which feed the engine control systems, so if an engine throttle demand message was transmitted then that would have been recorded, thus, if a software bug present in the engine control system resulted in a reduction in engine power, a reduced power setting message would have been transmitted over the bus, then this would be easily identified.

    All you then need to do, is marry up the messages sent from the pilot's throttle levers over the databus and it should be easy to identify whether there was a software bug or not.

  14. Anonymous Coward
    IT Angle

    "Having both engines have the same bug seems just as implausible"

    All the engines have the same engine control electronics and the same engine control software and share many common inputs, so common failure modes would actually not be that surprising. As another commenter noted, there is no dissimilar redundancy or independent design in this setup. What would be surprising would be common mode problem leading to service failure; that kind of stuff is supposed to be designed out.

    That being said, the AAIB report quoted by Richard seems fairly conclusive that the engine control did the right thing (I've read the whole report), and the fuel was the problem. Which is a shame, I quite liked the idea that Broon's spooks were using a high powered cellphone jammer which fried the controllers or some of their inputs. But why let facts spoil a good rumour or rant.

  15. Anonymous Coward
    Thumb Down

    Chinese jokers

    The Chinese couldn't make a decent cup of tea, let alone anything hi-tech like high quality av-gas.

  16. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    solution

    I suppose they could be a heater in to the fuel, prevent the ice forming, but you know what would happen, there would have to have a control system to turn the heater on when at high altitude in freezing conditions for a certain length of time and then turn it off when at lower altitude, so a computer...with a software bug... which would over heat the fuel and kaboom!

    300 people dead and they're they'd be trying to track down an almost near impossible problem..back to square 1.

    Computers...who needs 'em

  17. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Does this affect 777 pilots actions?

    Does this problem affect what the 77 pilots do? e.g. do they fly a high glide path when landing just-in-case the problem repeats? Just something else to add to the stress...

  18. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    @Chinese jokers

    "like high quality av-gas"

    Is there such a thing. I always thought that aero fuel was actually a lower grade fuel than the average car runs on.

  19. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Missing text

    "issued an airworthiness directive calling on operators of 777-200 and -300 aircraft equipped with Trent engines..."

    ... and running Windows Vista.

  20. Andy

    Jet A1 fuel

    is basicly parafin

  21. shay mclachlan

    "uncommanded rollback"

    "Uncommanded rollback". Why can't they just say an engine stopped working?

  22. Simon Neill

    Uncommanded Rollback

    "Uncommanded rollback". Why can't they just say an engine stopped working?

    Because it didn't stop working. The engine didn't stall, it slowed down.

  23. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    And so (obviously)...

    ...why can't they just say an engine slowed down.

  24. Doug

    uncommanded rollback ..

    Is an 'uncommanded rollback' the same thing as the pilot losing control of the computer?

  25. Johnny G

    Everyone has an opinion...

    I find it amazing that everyone here has a speculation... surely the air accident investigators (of the Heathrow crash) *might* know better and be more qualified to say than people here?!

  26. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    "...calling on operators of 777-200 and -300 aircraft equipped with Trent engines..."

    Perhaps they're actually Trent Reznor engines, and will fuck you like an animal.

  27. Keith Goodrum

    B777

    I am loth to agree with the NTSB concerning engine fuel problems, however the explanation given for the apparent engine fuel starvation, is certainly more feasible than the puerile comment given by the UK AIB. I would have thought that by now defect monitoring procedures would be in place to obviate any further recurrence of this apparent phenomena.

    I am not fully conversant with the B777 but I assume that the fuel heaters are sufficient for the job and I am sure that many sectors of high duration have been flown worldwide with this aircraft.

    Let us hope that a workable solution to this problem will be forthcoming soon, for the sake of Air Safety.

  28. BlueGreen

    @RotaCyclic

    Or you could follow my link, 2nd from top, and find a possible solution which doesn't involved heaters or software. And it's cheap. In fact here's the text in full so no-one has to follow a link.

    "

    If the Boeing 777 was indeed brought down at Heathrow by ice in its fuel (13 September, p 23), it would not be the first. One night in 1948 or 1949 four Royal Navy Attacker FB2 aircraft "fell out of the sky" at Royal Naval Air Station Milltown in Aberdeenshire, UK. Each had almost total loss of power in its single Rolls-Royce Nene 102 engine. In the morning we could find nothing wrong, apart from water in their low-pressure fuel filters when they were drained - about the same amount in each. They all started without trouble and were ground-run successfully. We concluded that the filters had iced up to the extent that the fuel flow had been severely impeded, but that overnight the ice had melted and the problem vanished.

    Careful investigation seemed to exonerate home base fuelling arrangements from being the source of the water, so we had to look elsewhere. Much of the fuel in the Attacker was carried in an exposed, virtually uninsulated, ventral tank. This would suffer severe cooling at altitude.

    Aviation fuel at room temperature contains dissolved water. We thought this might have come out of solution and formed ice on the filters. From then on it was standard procedure to add a small amount of methanol as antifreeze when refuelling the ventral tank. As far as I know, there were no further problems of this kind.

    Since no one was injured and no damage done the press evinced no interest. Possibly by now there are not a lot of us left who remember the incident, but Rolls-Royce may still have the details in their archives.

    "

  29. Simon Whiteley
    Paris Hilton

    Software cant cause...

    cavitation damage to a fuel pump!!!! software isnt physical!! come on guys...

    even paris knows that.

  30. paul bell
    Unhappy

    what do they all have in common?

    interesting that all reported incidences of this issue involved aircraft that have recently refueled in china - no, of course they wouldn't adulterate something as sensitive as jet fuel - would they?

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like