@Anonymous Coward
"If I would be an executive in Motorola, I would settle to Symbian and S60, use it in all smart phones, tailor and tweak icons, bundle some applications like Fring and throw the mobile with 10 different brothers and sisters of it to consumers... If it works for Nokia it should work with Motorola, but that would be too rational and efficient for them..."
Alternatively you could buy a small company with an existing demonstrated competence in producing Symbian OS based Smartphones which has fallen on hard times as a result of a well publicised falling out with Microsoft, invest heavily in them, allow them to work outside the process-heavy, innovation stifling environment the Big M normally does development in, and let them produce a Symbian OS based platform (UIQ based as it happens but that's neither her nor there in these days of touchless UIQ and touch sensitive S60...) which could form the base for a whole generation of products, tailor and tweak the icons, bundle some neat multimedia applications, and launch one or two quite nice products.
Oh, wait a minute that sounds like a sensible strategy. Far better to let existing Motorola product development teams tear the platform (which they've previously either ignored or worked hard at undermining) apart in a feeding frenzy as all and sundry try to establish themselves as stakeholders, shut down the development site you've just spent all that money on, make a significant proportion of the highly talented engineering team you originally bought Sendo^X^X^X^X^Xthe site for redundant, totally demoralise the rest of them and then congratulate selfs on a job well done.
Anonymous, because, well, you never know, one day I may just possibly need the money badly enough that I'd consider taking a contract with Motorola again...
Biting the hand that feeds IT
