Home Office bankrolls plastic plod 'documentaries' Ofcom is probing Home Office sponsorship of an ITV "documentary" on police community support officers. The broadcasting regulator has yet to launch a formal investigation, sort of like the PCSOs themselves. The Home Office paid £800,000 to sponsor two series of Beat: Life on the Street about police community support officers …
Not actually sure what the point of this is, or what Ofcom thinks it might be investigating.
So what if government sponsors this kind of documentary, its not a secret.
The one I would like to see is about the crack teams of HMRC Investigators who track down people who don't pay tax, a far more interesting subject, no really, that following DWP investigators bullying unemployed single parents for 1p overpayments, or stopping their benefits because a friend has stayed for a while.
No lets see HMRC bringing to book the great and the good who think tax doesn't apply to them.
The taxpayer funds the state broadcaster via the TV tax (aka License fee). The government decides that it's tentacles aren't getting enough positive publicity from da meejuh, so the taxpayer pays *again* to fund the production of more government-friendly pap disguised as documentaries.
I could spit, except you've neglected to provide the name of the minister that I should spit on.
Yet another example of the incestious relationship between the media and politics.
The basic equation goes like this you donote funds to the party and donate your time to the election campaign, then, we win the election and throw lots of taxpayers money in your direction.
a hard-hitting examination of the question of whether a prime minister should retire early.
Alternatively, a 1980s comedy show where nearly every single episode was a 20-year-early forecast of the behaviour of the current government ("never setup an enquiry without knowing in advance what it's findings will be", "don't lift lids of cans of worms", etc etc).
And should be paid for out of New Labour's funds.
To say they have no influence over content is clearly rubbish,
"he who pays the piper calls the tune"
or at least
"the piper plays the right tune if they want to get paid next time"
As in they're so happy with the result they are going to give the film make a whole pile more cash to make some more.
how do you spell SLEAZE these days?
What then does the BBC Licence fee/Stealth Tax buy in Public Service Propaganda terms? .
Precious little new and of any real Future Value apparently whenever the Programming is just old repeats, and fruity turns like an unkempt Ross....... and of course a generous dose of dopey kitchen soaps ...... and toys for the boys like Clarkson and Co?
Marks out of Ten for Effort? ...... Nul Point.
Three questions there, just in case there are any answers.
"No lets see HMRC bringing to book the great and the good who think tax doesn't apply to them."
that would be most of the Noo-Labour glitterati and media darlings then.
Of course, a completely independent and objective public enquiry can be set up to investigate this matter and whitewash erm sorry I mean conclude that HM Govt acted quite properly and above board and it was all the fault of the BBC/a scientist/smokers/car owners/men or whoever is the current bete noire of Harriet Harman's focus group.
Paris, 'cos I'd rather she was in power than this Noo-Labour shower of sh*t.
"...nearly every single episode was a 20-year-early forecast of the behaviour of the current government"
Correction: the behaviour of EVERY government
That's what made the program such a hit - it showed exactly what every government does when it's in power - doesn't matter who they are or what party it is. It's been like that forever - just read your history books! (Not the state sponsored versions of history of course)
Have a documentary on why teachers have such large, free car parks at schools to encourage them to drive, but tell parents they should not use their cars to take disabled children to school but that the child should walk.
Even better, on why the government are now forced to admit that they are defrauding the motorist by fiddling the figures on the expected drop in pollution on the new, confusing, retrospective vehicle taxes? After spending £millions on such negligence why is no minister to be sacked, but given the usual huge pay rise for failure?
Of course, they would have to create a real Ministry of Justice first.
Actually, most of the episodes of both YM and YPM were based on real incidents that had happened under previous administrations or the one then in power - including the Badgers of Wootton Wawen, the Dog on Salisbury Plain and, famously, The Keys. So close to reality were they that they were actually required viewing when I was doing Politics A level (which I passed, in the fullness of time, after due consideration and having regard to all the circumstances...).
This must be a some naturally occuring misunderstanding.... what could the government possibly acheive by slipping just short a million quid into the back pocket of a media company and then asking them to produce a documentary or two on their behalf? Do you people mean to imply that something unproper might have has happened? That really couldn't possibly be the case, after all, the government are so particularly careful to declare all of their expenses and their vested interests; they always avoid conflicts of interests and never resort to nepotism; they are quick to divulge their contributors and always refuse to take on private jobs in industry as rewards for any favourable politics that may have transpired; without a shadow of a doubt our government are the epitome of scruples and honesty and I am proud of their long established history carefully consider all of the implications within their policies in a clear and succinct manner.
.
.
.
.
.
[/complete gobshit]
The 1980s spoof National Registry was 'priced' at £35M, while our current one is somewhere skywards of 200 times that - has the pound really devalued so much, or has computing become that much less good value in 25 years?
Or, hmm lessee, does government gold-plating make up the difference, or private partnership overhead, or... well anyway, what a bargain that 1980s version would have been heh.
30 second pitch.
Permanently short and painfully cheerful Communities Secretary Hazel Blears, mounts her hog (that's a bike BTW.) to root out extremist behaviour around Britain. Armed with nothing more than a chirpy attitude and a government green paper she's our last bet hope to protect the New Labour Project.
It's only partly propaganda in that the first serious could have come out badly. Somehow the makers seemed to know what the Home Office was looking for without them even asking. Ofcom won't find a problem. There won't be a memo that says "could you cut out the bits where the PCSO look bad and keep in the bits that make them look good"
It's used to dupe us and it's paid for out of our own money. Well DUH! Ofcourse it is, that's what government does.
They are switching to PCSO's because they are cheaper. This means you also get people who want to be police even if the money is not good and they are not up to being real police. People say plastic police don't have enough power, expect that to change soon, and it won't be a good thing. Like Lollipop ladies all sorts of people will pop up in flouresant jackets, knighted with slightly more power than your average person. Like a first aid course there will be a 'Community Assistance Officer' course where road sweepers can raise their profile for the good of their community. Neighbourhood watch are getting special powers to nick people for speeding, Parish Councils are recieving speed gun licences. All of these things are going to need positive spin on TV.
We are becoming a nation of jumped up plastic police.
At least this goes some way to explain why ITV are incapable of producing anything that resembles decent documentary these days. With the Man from the Ministry playing back seat FCP editor, narrative, rationale and objectivity were always going to go for an extended lunch hour. Maybe if they sponsored the Today programme they wouldn't have to suffer the mauling dealt out to 'Sheepman' Darling this morning.
While doing this is apparently not illegal, it is immoral and therefore entirely in keeping with our repugnant government. If I was Eton Dave, I'd be cranking up the nasal whine in protest.
It was all simpler in the days when a Plastic Pig was a three wheeled car and therefore a bit more useful than the current incarnation.
A propagandumentry on how the various governments are able to form endless numbers of quangos composed of sundry non-experts on their particular subject, who then have sweeping powers to make liberty restraining laws without reference to parliament. Whilst at the same time draining vast amounts of money out of government coffers to their own benefit and improving life in Britain not one bit.
A title suggestion would be SHAFTED.
The dead vulture in this case represents British democracy.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
