
There is no Quid Pro Quo
But there damn well should be.
What is sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander.
Make the yanks follow their own rules when they choose to go International.
The European Commission has threatened action against US diplomats and service personnel if there's no movement from the United States on visa-free travel this year. Citizens of 12 EU member states currently require visas when travelling to the US, and according to the Commission no tangible progress has been made in talks to …
I think we require an EU wide, all state accessible registration system of US biometrics. After all, the guys that levelled those NY buildings were LIVING there, so the EU is presently leaving a massive hole in their approach to security. Besides, experiencing the reality behind what they expose the public to would be a Good Thing in any event.
We'd not be doing anything more than the US, call it a sort of levelling of the playing field. Any US resident wishing to enter the EU region should be fully finger printed and the data should be held in circumstances matching the US approach (i.e accessible to all who say they have an interest and are vaguely government related). I wouldn't go as far as suggesting it should be held to UK government standards because even TNT can sometimes fail to lose a CD, but a certain "relaxed" attitude to the management of that data is OK, and ditto for a no-fly list where we could randomly add some names for frequent extra harassment a la "please drop your trousers and bend over - don't cough".
The artificial hysterics have gone far enough, everyone involved has made their cash and the mini Hitlers have had their fun like any nobody given uncontrolled powers. Oh, and you can stop pretending there was any reality behind the binary bomb idea (the argument behind taking everyone's drink off them to mainly boost airport sales) - I'm sure it has already been forgotten who the official was who came up with that one so you're not going to embarrass him/her now by abandoning that limitation.
And what it has NOT done is made the world a safer place. Leaving aside the habit of shooting innocent Brazilians, in general the police do the more valuable HUMINT work. The airline security checks don't, and it's time people pretend they do. London has had years of Irish terrorism and never needed this nonsense (partly because they came over land anyway :-).
But then again what happened Hungary involving a death by hummer and the driver was a very drunken marine embassy guard , who was whisked out of the country in the dark of the night to avoid prosecution and jail for his evil deed unlike a certain similar incident in Washington DC with a Bulgarian Diplomat !
So in the la la land of the paranoid and imprisoned whose minorities are routinely terrorized and /or deliberately abused for their ethnic origins and some are deliberately murdered by their own police force who walk around free after their evil deeds even though these criminals were hired to serve and protect all in the community !
Strange times indeed , in this 21st century where propaganda and the continuing fear of the improbable what ifs rather then reality of very real dangers from common items has replaced the true rules of law in many lands !
I would rather not be automagically treated as a criminal upon entry to any country.
If the US insists on taking fingerprints etc (as they do), then I will not be travelling there for holidays or business.
The EU should implement the same rules for US citizens travelling anywhere in the EU. When they (US gov) get pissed off with this, they may change their behaviour.
Until such time, I shall not be gioing there. There are plenty of other countries in the world which I have yet to visit, and which do not treat tourists as crims.
This seriously pisses me off.
they wont let anyone with a criminal record in...
but they dont have any issue with exporting thier ciminality to the rest of the world...
looks like its time for full visa and background checks against US citizens, see how long they keep up the exclusions then...
along with the typical long delays at issuing visa's from EU states, should disrupt the US's criminal element...
oh hang on...
they get round that flying in that fancy air-force-one thingy all round the world....
viva la' revolution,,,,,
or failing that, the impeachment and repeal of all the mickey mouse laws introduced since 2000.... (on both sides of the pond)
"The US wants to let its citizens out but doesn't want nutty Europeans in"
Yes thank you, we have enough of our own nutters as it is.
For the "argh I'm not a criminal don't treat me like one" crowd, I'm curious as to how you feel about this quote from the article:
"The EU, meanwhile, has plans to introduce a similar system of its own"
Looks like this issue is not going to be limited to US travel?
. When they (US gov) get pissed off with this, they may change their behaviour.
They wont. IF the UK does it it will be done as a validation. Seriously whats with the obsession of will if we do it to the yanks they will get pissed off and stop. Why would the US stop ??? You would be surprised how many people would go along with it if you said its for your own security. What you think just cause the people dont want it it will stop ?? People in the UK dont want a national ID card. I dont see it stopping any time soon. I suspect that the finger printing has deterred very little..
Last thing lets see how folks react when the EU does the same to all foreigners.
And indeed under what conditions.
It is up to those of us not in the USA to decide whether we want to visit there or not.
Personally I object on so many levels to the rules required to visit the US and accordingly I will spend my tourism money elsewhere. This is a fair arrangement as
(1) There are plenty of places I would like to visit that are not in the US.
(2) The US economy doesn't need any tourist dollars at the moment anyway.
As long as the EU let the USA piss on them ,with the treatment of their citizens who travel to America, they will continue to do so.
The paranoid , demented , shithead American government should be shown that you will not be treated like this without retaliation .
Bush and his fellow war criminals should be sent to Coventry.
The country to trade with should be China. More honest ,more reliable, less treacherous and their word is there bond . (Much like the Englishman's word used to be)
Must rest now, before I get excited . Mm think of something nice!
Having successfully appealed Europe's €1.06bn ($1.2bn) antitrust fine, Intel now wants €593m ($623.5m) in interest charges.
In January, after years of contesting the fine, the x86 chip giant finally overturned the penalty, and was told it didn't have to pay up after all. The US tech titan isn't stopping there, however, and now says it is effectively seeking damages for being screwed around by Brussels.
According to official documents [PDF] published on Monday, Intel has gone to the EU General Court for “payment of compensation and consequential interest for the damage sustained because of the European Commissions refusal to pay Intel default interest."
The European Commission's competition enforcer is being handed another defeat, with the EU General Court nullifying a $1.04 billion (€997 million) antitrust fine against Qualcomm.
The decision to reverse the fine is directed at the body's competition team, headed by Danish politico Margrethe Vestager, which the General Court said made "a number of procedural irregularities [which] affected Qualcomm's rights of defense and invalidate the Commission's analysis" of Qualcomm's conduct.
At issue in the original case was a series of payments Qualcomm made to Apple between 2011 and 2016, which the competition enforcer had claimed were made in order to guarantee the iPhone maker exclusively used Qualcomm chips.
Meta, Twitter, Google, Microsoft and other tech companies and publishers have agreed to fight disinformation online in accordance with the European Commission's latest Code of Practice rules, which were published on Thursday.
The code [PDF] lists a broad set of commitments that signatories can choose to adhere to in the fight against digital fakery. Among the options are taking steps to demonetize disinformation; businesses should avoid placing ads next to fake news or profiting off the spread of false information online; and clearly labeling political advertisements.
Other concerns include making data from social media platforms more transparent and available for researchers and supporting the work of fact checkers. The EU updated these guidelines to tackle the rise of fake bots accounts and AI-generated deepfakes too. Signatories promise to outline their internal policies for dealing with manipulated content, and have to show their algorithms used for detecting and moderating deepfakes are trustworthy.
Analysis The European Parliament this week voted to support what is effectively a ban on the sale of cars with combustion engines by 2035, and automakers are not happy.
MEPs backed a plenary vote on Wednesday for "zero-emission road mobility by 2035" – essentially meaning no more diesel and gasoline-fueled vehicles on the road.
The ambitious target means the automotive battery industry will have to service a much larger demand over the coming years, and electric carmakers stand to benefit hugely – that is, if they can source the requisite semiconductors and batteries.
Apple will have to redesign its phones to include a USB-C charging port in iPhones it sells into Europe by 2024 after an EU amendment made USB-C the common standard across a range of devices.
In a live press conference, the rapporteur on the issue, Maltese MP Alex Agius Saliba, said: "This is a rule which will apply to everyone. Now it's no more a Memorandum of Understanding and having all the leeway that [Apple] had during the past 10 years – basically to not abide by this MoU – which was abided by the majority of manufacturers. So yes, Apple has to abide."
The single charging solution will be implemented as part of the amended Radio Equipment Directive, nine months after the legislative proposal was first tabled in September 2021.
Europe has moved closer toward new cybersecurity standards and reporting rules following a provisional network and information systems agreement dubbed NIS2 by the European Council and Parliament.
Once approved, NIS2 [PDF] will replace the current Directive on Security of Network and Information Systems, aka NIS, which was adopted in 2016. The new directive sets more stringent requirements — and possible sanctions, including fines — for a larger number of sectors that must comply with the computer security rules.
It also aims to eliminate "the wide divergences" among EU member states' risk management and security reporting rules by establishing uniform criteria for assessing, reporting on, and taking steps to reduce cyber risk.
It is set to be a contentious morning in Cupertino as Apple execs wake to the announcement of a new European Union investigation into anti-competitive practices.
The European Commission is examining Apple Pay, particularly how the tech giant restricts access to hardware and software third-party digital wallet apps needed to enable near-field communication (NFC) technology, which is central to Apple Pay and third-party alternatives.
"We preliminarily found that Apple may have restricted competition, to the benefit of its own solution Apple Pay. If confirmed, such a conduct would be illegal under our competition rules," said EC VP in charge of competition policy, Margrethe Vestager.
Proposed European regulations that purport to curb child abuse by imposing mass surveillance would be a "disaster" for digital privacy and strong encryption, say cybersecurity experts.
A number of options have been put forward for lawmakers to mull that aim to encourage or ensure online service providers and messaging apps tackle the "detection, removal, and reporting of previously-known and new child sexual abuse material and grooming."
These options range from voluntary detection and reporting of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and grooming, to legally mandating that service providers find and report such material using whatever detection technology they wish — essentially scanning all private communications and, if necessary, breaking end-to-end (E2E) encryption for everyone.
The US and the European Union have officially blamed Russia for a series of destructive data-wiping malware infections in Ukrainian government and private-sector networks – and said they will "take steps" to defend against and respond to Kremlin-orchestrated attacks.
Beginning in January, and continuing after Russian troops illegally invaded Ukraine the following month, as Ukrainian websites were vandalized or pummeled offline in distributed denial-of-service attacks, Russian cyberspies planted malicious data-destroying code in Ukraine's computers.
"The United States has assessed that Russian military cyber operators have deployed multiple families of destructive wiper malware, including WhisperGate, on Ukrainian Government and private sector networks," US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a statement today.
European lawmakers are voting in plenary on a Right to Repair resolution today amid calls for the initiative to go even further.
The draft motion for resolution [PDF] cited a survey that found 79 percent of EU citizens thought that manufacturers should make repairs easier, with 77 percent saying a repair would be preferable to replacement, and called for access to parts, repair information, and standardization among devices.
To that end, the motion emphasizes labels to indicate repairability and expected lifetime for products, access to parts and repair facilities, an extension to liability for defective goods beyond two years, and calls on the European Commission to "always take into account the highest possible level of consumer protection and consumer welfare."
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022