I doubt they'll win
They've been unsuccessful in an awful lot of these cases, if he has anything other than just a squatting page there (I'm not going to check from work) then he has every right to the domain.
So.....Go cry, Google emo kid.
Google is girding its loins for action against Pornoogle.nl, a Dutch site which indexes 26,000 movies from 11 Dutch online porn companies and shows previews. Site owner Ruben Doctor has several porn sites under different names. He claims name Pornoogle actually means porn ogle (to stare at porn) and is "just a joke". Jeroen …
Google's ubiquity and entry into the english dictionary means they may lose the rights to their own name if they are not careful, in exactly the same way Xerox did in the eighties. Anyone can use the word xerox now (meaning to copy something), in the same way that googling now means to look up on the internet (not just using the google site).
"Porngoogle actually means porn ogle"
Almost there, try 'porn go ogle' as defence and explain that using underscore or hyphens just confuses people so they dropped the connectors to make it easier for punters to enter the URL.
Absolutely no reference to Google whatsoever, nope none, nada, nothing. Honest.
Getting a lot of free publicity. On this one, my bias is towards Google.
But I keep hearing of far sillier cases, from the shop in Scotland owned by a Mr. MacDonald, through to Lockheed getting antsy about CGI models of WW2 bombers.
porngoogle for a search engine isn't that sort of stupidity.
But the lawyers never seem to target people who can fight back. Another cease & desist letter--it's almost more effort to do the billing.
'Actually 'xerox' (like 'kleenex' and unlike 'hoover') is part of the AMERICAN language, not ours.'
Now now, if you are going to be xenophobic, try to be accurate. There is no American language. There are American languages - many of them - and English is one. 'Kleenex' and 'xerox' are part of a dialect of English usually called US English, and the US produces its own dictionaries, which are quite properly called English dictionaries.
If you don't believe me, google the topic :)
are there yet one googol (or more) web sites?
has the most-used web searcher collected that quantity?
As to other brand names entering common parlance, I think but am not sure, that use with the initial letter in lower case is permitted and not an offence, use of the capital initial is inferred as intent to mean the original enterprise
When I altavista for GOOGLE all the results I get seem to be about Google
So any website that uses an url of the form <whatever>google should not be asked to cease and desist, but <whatever>Google could be so asked...
URLs are case-insensitive, so that doesn't make a difference. Generally, courts have ruled that similar names are permissible only if the businesses are sufficiently different that there is no chance of confusion. For example, a restaurant named MacDonald's would get a cease-and-desist letter before it opened. A farm equipment supplier with the same name would have no problems.
Of course Google are perfectly correct about this... because it's obviously far too easy to make this typo... I mean everybody somewhere has typed 'porn' instead of 'g' when going to a URL, and as a result thousands of dutch people are surprised and shocked to see this website instead of the friendly innocent Google search page due to a simple mistake, when all they wanted to do is search the web!!!
Yeah, I can see how this is a severe threat to Google - shut down the site now, I say!
Er, mine's the pornreen jacket.... er - I mean the green one...