Why am I not surprised that the one with "pussy"(fnarr fnarr) in it is in the lead?
The recent announcement that Bond 22 will be known as Quantum of Solace raised a few eyebrows among 007 movie buffs. Reaction among our beloved readership seemed to indicate that the film's producers couldn't have done any worse if they'd hired the bloke who thought it was a good idea to call a motion picture Don't Be a Menace …
This post has been deleted by its author
"Live and Let Die"
The problem is that it's passive - Bond shouldn't let things happen, he should make them happen.
I think the only Ian Fleming title that hasn't been used yet is Risico, and I'm in two minds as to whether that's awesome or not. (probes brain) The Property of a Lady? (probes brain) No, it's too early in the morning. Afternoon. Too early in the week.
For me the only person who has been a worse bond than craig was George Lazenby, I don't know how they are justifying the bond movies with DC in them. Casino royale was supposed to be where bond became a 00 agent, yet it had the current cast in it, and 2006 technology, yet it was supposed to take place prior to 1962's Dr No. It just doesn't work.
Plus don't forget DC's request that his next bond film feature full frontal bond nudity and a homosexual scene, the latter of which isn't really what bond is known for.
Perhaps one of the villains in Quantum of Solace will be called 'Ivor biggun' with respect to DC's request?
The only thing that could make it worse would be if they had paris hilton as some sort of evil supergenius... (for those looking for the paris aspect)