Sounds Nasty...
Ladyman-ITIS!
Love it. Had me giggling for a while, that one...
Stephen Ladyman, the former UK transport minister, is now working as an adviser to a traffic-data company. The MP, who stepped down from his ministerial post last year following the departure of Tony Blair but remains in Parliament, says in the Register of Members' Interests that he receives from £10,000 to £15,000 pa from …
"Another Nu Labour with his nose in the trough"
You don't need to be so specific, there's plenty of politicians across all shades of the political spectrum doing the same thing.
Pay all MPs the minimum wage and bar them from moonlighting. Then we might get some democrats instead of spivs.
It must be the compiler in me, but I have a bit of trouble parsing Ladyman-ITIS. Is it
(a) ladyman? OMG IT really IS!, i.e. the grown-up version, or (b) ladymanitis, like tonsilitis but lower down? Either way it sounds nasty for the back end code generator.
// my coat is the shrowding device you can't see
"Pay all MPs the minimum wage and bar them from moonlighting. "
Yes, you have to ask yourself how much spare time their "contract" as our representatives allows them to NOT spend on Constituency and Parliamentary duties.....
I am always told how busy an MP's life is.....
now we know why.... wealth collection
Still he only earns TEN times my families present income....poor chap. And I can thank Labour Government for that too. :-(
In 2000 Liam Byrne set up an IT procurement company called eGovernment Solutions Ltd. At the time he was working as an advisor to 10 Downing St. In 2004 he was elected to parliament in a byelection and in 2006 he was briefly minister for the police before being moved to immigration. At the same time a number of police forces ordered a computer system from EGS while he was still a shareholder in the company. The Mail on Sunday found out and he had to get rid of the shares rather quickly: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=406687&in_page_id=1770&in_a_source=&ct=5
If National Express had 16,000 coaches, they would be able to transport 0.8 million people at once. I think not.
A quick search shows an NE press release which says that in 2001 they signed up 530 of their coaches, which will supposedly deliver the same amount of data as from 16,000 cars.
Not quite the same thing.
And although Eddie Stobart lorries seem to be everywhere, I suspect that there are far fewer than 22,000 of those