3 x 8800 GTX?
Hell, I have ONE at home and I can't find a game that I can't play on max settings with 60+ fps.
By the time 3 8800GTX cards are needed, something better will do it cheaper. Complete overkill, and for bragging rights between nerds.
Nvidia has rolled out its first nForce 7-series chipset, this one targeting Intel processors and supporting the GPU maker's new three-way SLI technology. Nvidia nForce 780i SLI Nvidia's nForce 780i SLI The nForce 780i SLI supports Intel's one-, two- and four-core desktop processors on a frontside bus (FSB) clocked at …
3 overclocked 8800 GTX's would be awesome!
Is there a PSU and a fan large enough in the world to keep this powered and cool?
I needed a 500W PSU for one 8800 GTX on a dual core comp and overclocked it ran pretty hot! 3 of them and a quad core CPU might just melt a hole in the earth through to Australia.
I want one, but I think i'll need to build a nuclear power station next door to my house before I can get the power to run one.
At least I'd save on central heating costs.
... as found in most households, however they tend to refer to it as a "kettle".
Did PowerGen sponsor nVidia to develop this perhaps?
As for the comment that it is un-needed, perhaps these people are running dual 30" screen rigs, then they would need the extra muscle. After all, to be able to afford 3 high end graphics cards clearly dual large screen is nothing.
I have SLI and vista didn't recognise it for 6 months. By the time this is mainstream vista might catch up. It chews up your RAM leaving the game wanting for more.
But seriously that power and that rating you will need liquid cooling and serious fans for cooling the thing down. Never mind your electricity bill.
There isn't a game out there that needs that kind of graphics (crysis can run at those specs you don't use vista, have 4 GB RAM and normal SLI like me) but dual screens are not common in games yet either. I can think of 1 (supreme commander) which is a bag of sh*te anyway.
....Give it a few years for tri-SLI to be warranted.
Either way I am a sad gaming technie nerd and will most likely get it when I upgrade in a few years.
Taken from http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2007/12/17/first_look_nvidia_nforce_780i_sli/1
"The third x16 slot is actually full x16 this time around but is only PCI-Express Gen-1.1. While this offers an unbalanced bandwidth and latency difference (because it's connected to the south bridge) at best for 3-way SLI, Nvidia doesn't seem too concerned about this because most of the data in 3-way is passed over the new 3-way SLI connector. When asked, Nvidia also said that PCI-Express 2.0 is just an incremental update and provides only a one or two percent performance difference at best. Most users that do require the third x16 link will only need it for more mundane things like hardware RAID controllers etc, and for that job, it's perfectly suited."
Four blades was here before 3
http://www.slizone.com/object/slizone_quadsli.html
As for the insanity of GPU counts, I blame all those people so spoilt by graphics that they cannot for their life visualize what they're reading while playing a text-based game.
I once lamented this before and I'll do it again (strangely, I made the lament on my blog after reading one of el Reg's April Fools article earlier this year about how CPUs are actually getting slower). Why is it that Karateka runs on a 8086 with 256k of RAM and a CGA graphics card and still managed to have great graphics, great sound and great physics, while Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter needs dual-core CPUs, loads of RAM, PhysX, SLI and X-Fi and still managed to be a game that cannot hold my attention.