That's a perfect report.
It revealed exactly how crap AI is.
KPMG's October 2025 report on the wonders of agentic AI has been accused of demonstrating one of the tech's less desirable talents: making things up. Research outfit GPTZero claims a forensic review of the Big Four firm's October 2025 report, "Total Experience: Redefining Excellence in the Age of Agentic AI," found that only …
"Due diligence anyone?"
This had to get out, but the week was full of "important" meetings so it was off-loaded to a new intern who did it with AI as they didn't really know what the company was all about yet. Somebody may have read the first couple of sentences and thought it was on par with most other babble and clicked the "publish" button before they needed to get to their next meeting.
Having worked at this firm, in the tech division, this does not surprise me in the slightest.
Some Associate probably made this to fill his yearly publication KPI, and some idiot manager took it and ran with it.
And the now embarrassed Associate can't say they half assed it, because the manager has been showing it to Partners.
TLDR; the KPI's are the real problem here.
It would have been great if papers I had to submit while at university could have been that sloppy citing references. It would have saved so much time.
AI is supposed to be replacing humans, why? How? I think the cabin in the woods that was "just in case" needs to get bumped up on the priority list. Maybe I'll share my Meshtastic address, maybe I won't.