Re: If it's not on...
Wow... Another CSI expurt. Let's see if we can't break it down...
First the DNA evidence, if it exits, only confirms. The lack of DNA evidence doesn't imply innocence.
Second, there are many things that can degrade the DNA to the point that it becomes inconclusive.
Third, Assanage doesn't deny that he was there. His defense team acknowledges this in their affirmative defense by claiming that there was consensual sex.
With respect to the law, the extradition hearing is based on determining if the EAW is valid. It is not to try Assange in a UK court, or to second guess the evidence against Assange. This is why he should go to Sweden to face his accusers. So that there can be a trial.
If this were a conspiracy sponsored by th US government, they could always charge him, raise an extradiition request to the UK and ask Sweden to drop their case. But that hasn't happened has it? Remember Occam's Razor...
But don't let that stop you in your quest to save St. Julian.
The simple truth is that the defense team is grasping at straws in an effort to raise political pressure in the UK. Clearly that is not going to happen since St. Julian decided to thumb his nose at the justice system in the UK.