Text is better than graphics, graphics are better than video. Text is magic, ...
That could have come from me.
And then I talked and wrote to my children, only to notice that they didn't understand, mostly because they got tired after the opening salvo.
It had me realize that things are much worse, or perhaps even more different, than I realized.
Yet, for most things, my kids are not only functioning adults these days, they are even cultured, charming, smart and very much philosophers, like me.
Even if they don't read or write.
What's a bit jarring is that they know many of the ancient concepts by different names (English instad of Greek or Latin) and associate some Youtuber instead of the ancient philosophers, which first formulated those concepts by writing Greek or Latin.
We are essentially speaking a different language, even if the concepts are largely shared.
Text works for you and me, but that's because we are of that text generation.
What's wrong is to assume that it's best.
Yes, I'd agree it great for abstraction, because most can't write as fast as I can type, so they'd rather spend a bit extra time on abstracting while massaging their fingers, resharpening their pens and cleaning up the ink blots.
But humanity has enjoyed abstraction and text only for a very short period of its existance and most of social code or culture was actually transmitted in tales or actually dance and music.
Robin Dunbar is quite convincing when he argues that actually music and dance came from laughter and actually precede language by eons.
So videos may be far more brain compatible than text ever was.
And once AI has grown smart enough, every video can be reduced to or reproduced via a prompt, a rather good compression and small representation after all.
Anyhow, I generally like your posts a lot, this one was so much of a rant I felt tempted to throw something at you.
P.S. My kids can do videos, really cool stuff and as if it was nothing!