Just more crystal ball gazing a la languishing VP analyst at Gartner ‽ ...or maybe not
Lindsay, Hi,
Whereas it may or may not be the case that business value from GenAI remains elusive despite IT spending boom, the same cannot be said of the value of businesses subject to the interference and future reliance on GenAI, which slowly and surely continues to grow in number, in order that established legacy positions try to maintain the lead of, and retain command and control of, hostile opposition and peer competition alike.
And the element of stealthy self-harming collateral risk in novel and sensitive entrepreneurial fields of AIDevelopment is a constantly clear and present danger to be prepared for, or ideally, never entertain, with some business operations more susceptible to self-harm than others. Great care is best taken with this prime candidate for GenAI shenanigans .......
amfM [2501220834] ..... points out an alarming development on https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2025/1/22/algorithmic-warfare-key-quantum-provision-dropped-from-2025-ndaa
[Thank you. Your comment willmay not be displayed soon after reviewing.]
Josh, Hi,
You may like to consider and realise that quantum technology and its communicable applications are neither compatible nor appropriate for bellicose military operations, revealing as they are able to do, exploitable systemic vulnerabilities against which there is no available defence against a vast novel range of likely never before even imagined possible, successful attack vectors.
Things have changed, it is a new era ... and nothing is just as simple as it was before for there are new practical, virtually remote command and control levers to master for the benefits which flow associated with the exercise of an AI Advantage [a Derivative Dividend for Almighty IntelAIgents?]