What court order?
If they weren't logging those IP addresses and connection strings, there was nothing to seize. They said the weren't. As to a court order requiring you to implement such logging when demanded.... show me the law that says any such thing, that somehow cannot be challenged!
Better still show me the court order itself. All I could find was copyright related (Article 77i CopA). The US pushed them to backdoor their privacy right, so they added a IP logging in the copyright law, but that's for copyright infringement.
Whenever dealing with "Swiss" stuff that feels America, (I class Proton Mail as this), you should recall Crypto AG, the "Swiss" encryption system, that was actually a CIA front.
" The Swiss firm made millions of dollars selling equipment to more than 120 countries well into the 21st century. Its clients included Iran, military juntas in Latin America, nuclear rivals India and Pakistan, and even the Vatican."
"But what none of its customers ever knew was that Crypto AG was secretly owned by the CIA in a highly classified partnership with West German intelligence. These spy agencies rigged the company’s devices so they could easily break the codes that countries used to send encrypted messages. "
When you see a well funded company in encryption like this, I suggest you ask who the f**k funded that and who is the target audience. Is this company too good to be true?
So don't be surprised when the slightest court order lands on a fake CIA operation, and they cave immediately to create case law, in Switzerland or elsewhere, because that's what they're there to do, fold. Create false case law, false consensus, undermine privacy rights.
All that western tech, its all shit, its all backdoored. All secret police notices, all secret surveillance, backdoored encryption, false systems. All of it.