tag:theregister.com,2005:feed/forum/theregister.com/2019/09/18/gatwick_facial_recognition/
The Register forum: Your ugly mug may be scanned yet again – but at least you'll be able to board faster at Gatwick
2019-09-20T12:20:31Z
Copyright © 2024, Situation Publishing Ltd.
Team Register (and a cast of thousands of forum denizens)
webmaster@theregister.co.uk
https://www.theregister.com/odds/about/contact/
https://www.theregister.com/Design/graphics/icons/favicon.png
https://www.theregister.com/Design/graphics/Reg_default/The_Register_r.png
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3875606
2019-09-20T12:20:31Z
Re: Hope they've ironed out the bugs
dubious https://forums.theregister.com/user/67834/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874741
2019-09-19T13:16:56Z
No escape
Robert D Bank https://forums.theregister.com/user/75324/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874522
2019-09-19T09:38:34Z
Re: as long as those images are not then being forwarded to law enforcement
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874519
2019-09-19T09:34:58Z
Re: At some point we have to consider drawing a line
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874516
2019-09-19T09:30:26Z
Re: 1 is fairly easy and accurate. 2 not so much.
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874503
2019-09-19T09:23:09Z
more time enjoying the shops
m-k https://forums.theregister.com/user/84218/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874498
2019-09-19T09:21:26Z
Re: The infamous 90%
Jimmy2Cows https://forums.theregister.com/user/73822/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874497
2019-09-19T09:20:54Z
passengers found the tech easy to use
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874466
2019-09-19T08:35:21Z
Re: Let's not get two separate things confused.
Warm Braw https://forums.theregister.com/user/66447/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874447
2019-09-19T08:16:07Z
Re: no data would be stored for longer than a few seconds
Efer Brick https://forums.theregister.com/user/89429/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874436
2019-09-19T08:02:54Z
Re: Why would this be faster?
elaar https://forums.theregister.com/user/53172/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874409
2019-09-19T07:36:32Z
Re: Let's not get two separate things confused.
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874146
2019-09-18T18:38:27Z
No Title
Not Enough Coffee https://forums.theregister.com/user/89322/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874100
2019-09-18T17:16:07Z
Re: Hope they've ironed out the bugs
Charlie Clark https://forums.theregister.com/user/2125/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874091
2019-09-18T17:06:53Z
Re: Why would this be faster?
Charlie Clark https://forums.theregister.com/user/2125/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874088
2019-09-18T17:01:35Z
Re: Let's not get two separate things confused.
LeahroyNake https://forums.theregister.com/user/83665/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3874037
2019-09-18T16:08:03Z
Re: What time is saved?
Anonymous Custard https://forums.theregister.com/user/23482/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873965
2019-09-18T15:10:15Z
Re: Why would this be faster?
Baldrickk https://forums.theregister.com/user/80274/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873964
2019-09-18T15:07:58Z
Re: Of course they'd like to implement this
Baldrickk https://forums.theregister.com/user/80274/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873917
2019-09-18T14:25:14Z
Re: Why would this be faster?
Korev https://forums.theregister.com/user/81486/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873913
2019-09-18T14:22:53Z
Re: What time is saved?
jmch https://forums.theregister.com/user/83609/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873897
2019-09-18T14:11:41Z
Re: Why would this be faster?
jmch https://forums.theregister.com/user/83609/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873894
2019-09-18T14:08:27Z
Re: Why would this be faster?
jmch https://forums.theregister.com/user/83609/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873889
2019-09-18T14:04:55Z
Re: no data would be stored for longer than a few seconds
jmch https://forums.theregister.com/user/83609/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873862
2019-09-18T13:43:22Z
Re: no data would be stored for longer than a few seconds
Woodnag https://forums.theregister.com/user/42915/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873854
2019-09-18T13:36:58Z
Re: Of course they'd like to implement this
OrientalHero https://forums.theregister.com/user/34284/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873837
2019-09-18T13:28:36Z
Re: Let's not get two separate things confused.
jmch https://forums.theregister.com/user/83609/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873827
2019-09-18T13:20:19Z
Hope they've ironed out the bugs
joeW https://forums.theregister.com/user/56948/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873666
2019-09-18T13:04:19Z
I think we should be checking the identity of all those who are checking our identities...
DrDudd https://forums.theregister.com/user/93856/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873795
2019-09-18T13:01:52Z
Re: Who are you?
stratofish https://forums.theregister.com/user/45805/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873779
2019-09-18T12:53:37Z
Re: What time is saved?
Anonymous Custard https://forums.theregister.com/user/23482/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873746
2019-09-18T12:35:16Z
Re: Why would this be faster?
Charlie Clark https://forums.theregister.com/user/2125/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873739
2019-09-18T12:30:28Z
Well you're not being cynical there.
Dabooka https://forums.theregister.com/user/7499/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873689
2019-09-18T12:05:01Z
Re: no data would be stored for longer than a few seconds
Drew Scriver https://forums.theregister.com/user/86282/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873683
2019-09-18T12:00:03Z
Actually experienced it...
Philip Mather https://forums.theregister.com/user/71923/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873680
2019-09-18T11:56:49Z
Re: no data would be stored for longer than a few seconds
Jason Bloomberg https://forums.theregister.com/user/17926/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873678
2019-09-18T11:55:08Z
Re: Why would this be faster?
Tom 38 https://forums.theregister.com/user/34227/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873672
2019-09-18T11:51:48Z
The infamous 90%
Drew Scriver https://forums.theregister.com/user/86282/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873671
2019-09-18T11:51:14Z
No Title
NonSSL-Login https://forums.theregister.com/user/77917/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873658
2019-09-18T11:41:02Z
Re: Who are you?
Phil O'Sophical https://forums.theregister.com/user/54287/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873654
2019-09-18T11:35:40Z
And when the system breaks down
M7S https://forums.theregister.com/user/6301/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873630
2019-09-18T11:19:26Z
Re: no data would be stored for longer than a few seconds
Anonymous Coward
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873628
2019-09-18T11:16:56Z
Re: no data would be stored for longer than a few seconds
JDX https://forums.theregister.com/user/43046/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873626
2019-09-18T11:15:52Z
What time is saved?
JDX https://forums.theregister.com/user/43046/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873623
2019-09-18T11:13:00Z
Re: Why would this be faster?
Anonymous Custard https://forums.theregister.com/user/23482/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873619
2019-09-18T11:09:55Z
Who are you?
Anonymous Custard https://forums.theregister.com/user/23482/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873609
2019-09-18T10:58:29Z
Re: no data would be stored for longer than a few seconds
Anonymous Custard https://forums.theregister.com/user/23482/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873605
2019-09-18T10:55:28Z
Re: Why would this be faster?
Aristotles slow and dimwitted horse https://forums.theregister.com/user/10416/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873596
2019-09-18T10:48:00Z
Re: no data would be stored for longer than a few seconds
phuzz https://forums.theregister.com/user/40577/
tag:theregister.com,2005:post/3873593
2019-09-18T10:43:48Z
Why would this be faster?
Charlie Clark https://forums.theregister.com/user/2125/